No abstract

Background: Migraine and epilepsy are both common episodic disorders, typically precipitated or inhibited by some modulatory factors (MFs).Objective: To assess the self-perception of MFs in patients with migraine (PWM) compared to patients with epilepsy (PWE) with a standardized protocol in different countries.Methods: Transcultural multicenter comparative cross-sectional study. All consecutive patients who fulfilled the ICHD-3 criteria for migraine and ILAE's criteria for epilepsy, with at least 1 year of follow-up were interviewed with a semi-structured questionnaire on clinical and epidemiological data and were asked to identify all experienced MFs from a provided list.Results: A total of 608 individuals were surveyed at five university referral centers in Brazil, Guatemala, Lithuania and Turkey. Two hundred and nineteen (91.6%) PWM and 305 (82.7%) PWE identified attack precipitating factors (PFs; p < 0.001). The most frequent three PFs reported by epilepsy patients were: “lack of sleep” (56.6%), “emotional stress” (55.3%), “negative feelings” (53.9%), while among migraine patients “emotional stress” (81.6%), “lack of sleep” (77.8%), “negative feelings” (75.7%) were cited. Inhibitory factors (IFs) for the episodes were reported by 68 (28.5%) PWM and 116 (31.4%) PWE. “Darkness” was the most common one, described by 35.6% of PWM whereas “positive feelings” reported by 10.6% of PWE. Most MFs are concordant across the countries but some transcultural differences were noted.Conclusion: The MFs of migraine and epilepsy attacks and their varying frequencies according to different countries were investigated with the same standardized questionnaire, for the first time. MFs were recognized very often in both migraine and epilepsy cohorts, but in distinct disease-specific prevalence, being more frequent in migraine. Recognition of self-perceived MFs may be helpful for the management of both illnesses.

Objective. This study aimed to analyse the effect of neuropsychological activation methods on interictal epileptiform discharges, compared to standard activation methods, for both focal and generalized epilepsies. Methods. This was a multicentre, prospective study including 429 consecutive EEG recordings of individuals with confirmed or suspected diagnosis of epilepsy. Neuropsychological activation included reading aloud in foreign and native language, praxis and a letter cancelation task (each with a duration of three minutes). After counting interictal discharges in three-minute time windows, activation and inhibition were assessed for each procedure, accounting for spontaneous fluctuations (95% CI) and compared to the baseline condition with eyes closed. Differences between generalized and focal epilepsies were explored. Results. Interictal epileptiform discharges were present in 59.4% of the recordings. Activation was seen during hyperventilation in 31%, in at least one neuropsychological activation method in 15.4%), during intermittent photic simulation in 13.1% and in the resting condition with eyes open in 9.9%. The most frequent single cognitive task eliciting activation was praxis (10.3%). Lasting activation responses were found in 18-25%. Significant inhibition was found in 88/98 patients with baseline interictal epileptiform discharges, and was not task-specific. Significance. Adding a brief neuropsychological activation protocol to the standard EEG slightly increased its sensitivity in patients with either focal or generalized epilepsy. However, in unselected epilepsy patients, this effect seems only exceptionally to result in ultimate diagnostic gain, compared to standard procedures. From a diagnostic perspective, cognitive tasks should be reserved for patients with a suspicion of cognitive reflex epilepsy/seizures and probably require longer exposure times. Further research is needed to explore potential therapeutic applications of the observed inhibition of interictal epileptiform discharges by cognitive tasks in some patients.

No abstract

Purpose: Cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) is known to increase in many conditions of sleep disruption and sleep disorders, including obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and periodic limb movements in sleep (PLMS). Periodic limb movements in sleep associated with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome may vanish after positive airway pressure treatment, may persist, or emerge at treatment night. Here, the authors aimed to investigate the underlying pathophysiology of nonvanishing, vanishing, or newly emergent PLMS. Methods:The authors designed a prospective study and included 10 patients with nonvanishing PLMS during positive airway pressure therapy, 10 patients with vanishing PLMS, 10 patients with newly emergent PLMS, and 10 patients without PLMS at both nights. The CAP analysis was performed in detail at diagnostic polysomnography recording and at positive airway pressure titration. The changes in CAP parameters were evaluated in regard to nonvanishing, vanishing, or newly emergent PLMS.Results: Periodic limb movements in sleep related to A1 subtype of CAP were observed to decrease under positive airway pressure titration more than PLMS related to A3 subtype of CAP. The A3 subtype of CAP was higher in patients with vanishing PLMS than those with newly emergent PLMS. The newly emergent PLMS were mostly related to A1 subtype of CAP compared with A3 subtype of CAP.Conclusions: This study showed that vanishing, nonvanishing, or newly emerging PLMS may indeed represent different underlying pathophysiology. The authors suggest that organization of sleep and preservation of ultradian rhythms during titration may determine whether PLMS will be vanished or persist. Newly emergent PLMS may probably arise from a separate central generator by the activation of higher cortical areas.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract