BackgroundThe international Inherited Neuropathy Consortium (INC) was created with the goal of obtaining much needed natural history data for patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease. We analysed clinical and genetic data from patients in the INC to determine the distribution of CMT subtypes and the clinical impairment associated with them.MethodsWe analysed data from 1652 patients evaluated at 13 INC centres. The distribution of CMT subtypes and pathogenic genetic mutations were determined. The disease burden of all the mutations was assessed by the CMT Neuropathy Score (CMTNS) and CMT Examination Score (CMTES).Results997 of the 1652 patients (60.4%) received a genetic diagnosis. The most common CMT subtypes were CMT1A/PMP22 duplication, CMT1X/GJB1 mutation, CMT2A/MFN2 mutation, CMT1B/MPZ mutation, and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy/PMP22 deletion. These five subtypes of CMT accounted for 89.2% of all genetically confirmed mutations. Mean CMTNS for some but not all subtypes were similar to those previously reported.ConclusionsOur findings confirm that large numbers of patients with a representative variety of CMT subtypes have been enrolled and that the frequency of achieving a molecular diagnosis and distribution of the CMT subtypes reflects those previously reported. Measures of severity are similar, though not identical, to results from smaller series. This study confirms that it is possible to assess patients in a uniform way between international centres, which is critical for the planned natural history study and future clinical trials. These data will provide a representative baseline for longitudinal studies of CMT.Clinical trial registrationID number NCT01193075.

No abstract

No abstract

Gait pattern classification may assist in clinical decision making and cluster analysis (CA) has been often adopted to this aim. The goal of this study was to identify, through CA, typical walking patterns in a group of 21 young subjects with CMT1A, a hereditary progressive neuropathy, and to study possible correlation with the disease's clinical status. The protocol included kinematic/ kinetic analysis of natural walking and more demanding locomotor tasks, i.e. toe-and heelwalking. Hierarchical cluster analysis was carried out on parameters related to primary signs (footdrop and push-off deficit) and, separately, to compensatory mechanisms at proximal (pelvis, hip and knee) or distal (ankle) level.CA on primary signs during natural walking identified three clusters: (1) pseudo-normal patients (PN), not significantly different from controls; (2) patients showing only foot-drop (FD); (3) patients with foot-drop and push-off deficit (FD&POD). Patients belonging to the PN subgroup showed distal abnormalities during heel-walking. The FD&POD subgroup was associated to a significantly worse clinical score (CMTES, p < 0.05). The main compensatory strategies, which occurred independently from primary clusterization, included augmented hip/knee flexion in swing (steppage) and early ankle plantarflexion at mid stance (vaulting). We concluded that, although a number of young CMT1A patients do not show typical primary deviations during natural walking, they do show significant abnormalities in more demanding locomotor tasks that should be therefore considered. It is also hypothesized that progression of this degenerative condition may be associated to the migration of patients to more severe clusters, with possible appearance of compensatory strategies.

The aim of this prospective study was to determine the outcome of affected hand impairment and disability in a group of 31 children (16 males, 15 females) with hemiplegic cerebral palsy who were referred consecutively to our rehabilitation service and followed from a mean age of 2 years and 7 months to a mean age of 12 years and 9 months. The hand function assessment protocol consisted of video‐recorded procedures: one to assess grip and the other to assess the extent of spontaneous use of the affected hand. Assessments at outset and at latest follow‐up showed that the series as a whole had greater hand impairment in spontaneous manipulation than in gripping tasks. Comparison of hand function before age 4 years with the latest assessment over age 11 years revealed a nonsignificant improvement in grip, whereas spontaneous hand use remained stable. All but one of the children who had good grip and hand use scores at first assessment maintained them over time unless they were not treated for hand dysfunction. Among the children with low scores at outset, the improvement over time was more marked in grip than spontaneous hand use and occurred mainly in the early years. These results suggest that to evaluate the real disability of the affected hand in children with hemiplegia, grip assessment is insufficient and that an instrument assessing spontaneous hand use in bilateral manipulation is required. Furthermore, intensive treatment focused on hand function should be planned in the early years for children with more severe hand impairment, whereas regular follow‐up is sufficient for less affected children.