Objectives Although many people who use drugs meet criteria for vaccination against hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV), estimates of susceptibility (ie, lack of immunity) are not well established. This study sought to identify the prevalence of and characteristics associated with HAV and HBV susceptibility among people who use drugs attending an urban syringe services program. Methods We initiated this seroprevalence study in 2018 among 438 clients of a syringe services program who met study criteria, including provision of a blood specimen and a self-reported history of drug use. We assessed HAV and HBV susceptibility and infection via serological testing. We examined associations between participant characteristics and serology status by using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models. Results Of the initial 438 clients identified, 353 (80.6%) met study criteria. Of 352 participants with conclusive HAV test results, 48.6% (n = 171) were HAV susceptible; of 337 participants with conclusive HBV test results, 32.6% (n = 110) were HBV susceptible, 24.3% (n = 82) showed evidence of past or present HBV infection, and 43.0% (n = 145) had vaccine-derived immunity. Compared with participants born before 1970, participants born during 1980-1989 had 5.90 (95% CI, 2.42-14.40) times the odds of HAV susceptibility and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.06-0.53) times the odds of HBV susceptibility, and participants born during 1990-1999 had 6.31 (95% CI, 2.34-17.00) times the odds of HAV susceptibility. Decreased odds of HAV susceptibility were associated with homelessness (adjusted odds ratio = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.28-0.82). Conclusion Despite applicable HAV and HBV vaccination recommendations, substantial gaps exist in HAV and HBV susceptibility among a population of people who use drugs. These findings highlight the need for increased HAV and HBV vaccination efforts among people who use drugs.

No abstract

BackgroundThe growing opioid epidemic is driving increasing rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in the United States. HCV transmission is most frequently attributed to unsafe injection behaviors, but can occur via other unsafe drug use and sexual behaviors. Differences in demographics, HCV rates and associated risk factors in non-injecting PWUD (NIPWUD), compared with people who inject drugs (PWID) must be understood in order to target elimination strategies.MethodsChange is Philadelphia’s program to eliminate HCV among PWUD and enrollment includes HCV testing, linkage services, and an interviewer-administered survey including risk behaviors and healthcare engagement. This interim analysis includes the first 835 enrollees that identified as PWUD. For this analysis, PWID are enrollees who indicated ever injecting drugs and those who had not are NIPWUD.ResultsAmong enrollees, 76% (N = 637) reported ever injecting drugs. PWIDs were younger and non-Hispanic (NH) white while NIPWUD were older and NH Black (age: P = 0.003; race/ethnicity: P < 0.0001). NIPWUDs had a high seropositivity rate though significantly lower than PWIDs (24% vs. 85%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Among PWID enrollees, 94% (N = 596) ever snorted. Of enrollees, 63% (N = 124) of NIPWUD and 56% (N = 356) of PWID identified having a PCP (P =0.07). PWIDs are more likely than NIPWUD to have overdosed (OD) (40% vs. 9%; P < 0.0001) though high rates of both groups ever witnessed an OD (84% vs. 67%, respectively). While 80% (N = 105) of NIPWUDs know how to use Narcan, 60% (N = 79) carry it, {94% (N = 503) and 71%(N = 381) in PWID, respectively}. NIPWUDs are more likely to be interested in drug treatment (P < 0.0001) and to have received it in the last 12 months (P = 0.0008).ConclusionNotable HCV infection exists among non-injecting PWUD reinforcing the need for harm reduction counseling and access to drug use equipment used for smoking and snorting. NIPWUD may be able to access drug and HCV treatment through PCPs and fatal ODs may be prevented by ensuring NIPWUDs have access to Narcan. In addition, PWID are likely to snort as well and should be counseled on non-injecting harm reduction methods. To succeed in micro elimination among PWUD, a focus on NIPWUDs as well as PWIDs is necessary to mitigate transmission of HCV.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.