The QuantiFERON has advantages and limitations depending on the type of population studied. Recommendations are made to improve the sensitivity and specificity and to differentiate between latent and active TB by adding other specific proteins in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen cocktail.
Maternal age, type of pregnancy and twins' sets are new MTCT risk factors. Strategies to further decrease transmission through family planning, pre/post natal consultations and clinical practices are needed.
Diagnosis of tuberculosis still faces a lot of challenges and is one of the priorities in the field of tuberculosis management. Deciphering the complex tuberculosis pathogenicity network could provide biomarkers for diagnosis. We discussed the distribution of HLA-B17, -DQB and -DRB together with QuantiFERON test results in tuberculosis infection. A case control study was done during which a total of 337 subjects were enrolled comprising 227 active tuberculosis (ATB), 46 latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and 64 healthy controls (HC). Sequence-specific primer polymerase chain reaction and immune epitope database were used to genotype samples and determine the epitope binding ability of the over-represented alleles respectively. QuantiFERON test was done according to manufacturer's instructions. The peptides HLA-B*5801 and HLA-DRB1*12 and the peptides HLA-B*5802 and HLA-DQB1*03 were found to be associated with latent tuberculosis while the haplotypes DRB1*10-DQB1*02 and DRB1*13-DQB1*06 were found to be associated with active tuberculosis (All p-values≤0.05). The association of HLA-B*5801 and HLA-B*5802 with latent tuberculosis was linked to their ability to bind or not mycobacterial antigens. DRB1*10-DQB1*02 haplotype was found to be over-represented in LTBI compared to ATB (p-value = 0.0015) while DRB1*13-DQB1*06 was found to be under-represented in LTBI compared to ATB (p-value = 0.0335). The DRB1*10-DQB1*02 haplotype was only found in the LTBI when compared with the ATB group. The present study suggests the following algorithm to discriminate LTBI from ATB: QuantiFERON+ and DRB1*10-DQB1*02 haplotype + may indicate LTBI; QuantiFERON+ and DRB1*10-DQB1*02 haplotype - may indicate ATB.
Background and objectivesThe association of chemokine receptor-2 (CCR2) polymorphism with HIV transmission or disease progression remains highly controversial. The role of CCR2-64I allele in HIV infection may differ from one population to another because of their genetic background. The objectives of this study were to characterize the CCR2 genetic polymorphism and to determine its potential effect in HIV acquisition in children living in the Northern Region of Cameroon.Materials and methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out in five health facilities in the Northern region of Cameroon. DNA was extracted from the Buffy coat of each participant using the QIAamp®DNA mini kit. The DNA extract was then subjected to polymorphic analyses. CCR2 genotypes were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). The Chi-Squared test was used for the assessment of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.ResultsA total of 134 children under 15 years comprised of 38 HIV-exposed infected (28.36%) and 96 HIV-exposed un-infected (71.64%) participants were recruited. Prevalences of 44.78% wild type homozygous, 48.52% heterozygous and 6.7% mutant homozygous alleles were found in the overall population. An allelic frequency of 29.69% for the mutant allele CCR2-64I was found in HIV-exposed un-infected individuals as compared to 34.21% in HIV-infected children (p=0.47).ConclusionThe CCR2-64I allele is relatively common in the Northern Region of Cameroon, with a similar distribution among HIV-exposed un-infected and infected children. As this allele alone does not seem to confer protection against HIV-1 infection, further studies using genotype-combination of CCR2 polymorphism and other single nucleotide polymorphisms would be of great relevance in both HIV prevention and novel therapeutic strategies.
IntroductionThe number of HIV exposed uninfected (HEU) infants is increasing as vertical transmission is reducing. This subpopulation requires more investigations. This study aimed at comparing the expression level of soluble Fas receptors (FasR) and ligands (FasL) between HIV infected, HEU and unexposed children.MethodsEighty eight HIV-1infected, 86 HEU and 38 HIV unexposed children were recruited. Soluble FasR and FasL were measured in their plasma. Mann-Whitney U-Test was used to compare groups with 95% confidence. Spearman coefficient was used to test the correlation with CD4 and viral load (VL).ResultsOverall plasma levels of FasR were higher than that of FasL. The concentration of FasR and FasL were significantly higher in HIV-1 infected children in comparison to HEU and unexposed children. There was no difference in the plasma level of FasL in HIV infected compared to HEU children. A significant difference was observed between HIV infected children and HEU children (P=0.001) for the FasL. FasR were higher in both HIV infected and unexposed children compared to HEU children. There was a positive correlation (rs=+0.4; p=0.01) in ARV treated children between CD4 count and FasL concentration. Significant negative correlation (rs=-0.3; p=0.040) in ARV naïve children was observed between CD4 percentage and FasL. Significant and positive correlation (rs=+0.4; p=0.008) was observed between the VL and FasL in HIV infected, treated or not.ConclusionHEU children differ from HIV infected and unexposed children as the level of FasL/R expression is concerned. HEU should be considered different from HIV unexposed although exempt from virus as some immune dysfunctions have been reported among them.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.