Nanoparticles represent an attractive option for systemic delivery of therapeutic compounds to the heart following myocardial infarction. However, it is well known that physicochemical properties of nanoparticles such as size, shape and surface modifications can vastly alter the distribution and uptake of injected nanoparticles. Therefore, we aimed to provide an examination of the rapid size-dependent uptake of fluorescent PEG-modified polystyrene nanoparticles administered immediately following cardiac ischaemia-reperfusion injury in mice. By assessing the biodistribution of nanoparticles with core diameters between 20 nm and 2 μm 30 minutes after their administration, we conclude that 20–200 nm diameter nanoparticles are optimal for passive targeting of the injured left ventricle.
This study comprehensively investigates the changing biodistribution of fluorescent-labelled polystyrene latex bead nanoparticles in a mouse model of inflammation. Since inflammation alters systemic circulatory properties, increases vessel permeability and modulates the immune system, we theorised that systemic inflammation would alter nanoparticle distribution within the body. This has implications for prospective nanocarrier-based therapies targeting inflammatory diseases. Low dose lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a bacterial endotoxin, was used to induce an inflammatory response, and 20 nm, 100 nm or 500 nm polystyrene nanoparticles were administered after 16 hours. HPLC analysis was used to accurately quantify nanoparticle retention by each vital organ, and tissue sections revealed the precise locations of nanoparticle deposition within key tissues. During inflammation, nanoparticles of all sizes redistributed, particularly to the marginal zones of the spleen. We found that LPS-induced inflammation induces splenic macrophage polarisation and alters leukocyte uptake of nanoparticles, with size-dependent effects. In addition, spleen vasculature becomes significantly more permeable following LPS treatment. We conclude that systemic inflammation affects nanoparticle distribution by multiple mechanisms, in a size dependent manner.
Bone tissue engineering provides many advantages for repairing skeletal defects. Although many different kinds of biomaterials have been used for bone tissue engineering, safety issues must be considered when using them in a clinical setting. In this study, we examined the effects of using a common clinical item, a hemostatic gelatin sponge, as a scaffold for bone tissue engineering. The use of such a clinically acceptable item may hasten the translational lag from laboratory to clinical studies. We performed both degradation and biocompatibility studies on the hemostatic gelatin sponge, and cultured preosteoblasts within the sponge scaffold to demonstrate its osteogenic differentiation potential. In degradation assays, the gelatin sponge demonstrated good stability after being immersed in PBS for 8 weeks (losing only about 10% of its net weight and about 54% decrease of mechanical strength), but pepsin and collagenases readily biodegraded it. The gelatin sponge demonstrated good biocompatibility to preosteoblasts as demonstrated by MTT assay, confocal microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. Furthermore, osteogenic differentiation and the migration of preosteoblasts, elevated alkaline phosphatase activity, and in vitro mineralization were observed within the scaffold structure. Each of these results indicates that the hemostatic gelatin sponge is a suitable scaffold for bone tissue engineering.
In patients who survive myocardial infarction, many go on to develop congestive heart failure (CHF). Despite ongoing efforts to develop new approaches for postinfarction therapy, there are still no effective therapeutic options available to CHF patients. Currently, the delivery of cardioprotective drugs relies entirely on passive uptake via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect which occurs in proximity to the infarction site. However, in ischemic disease, unlike in cancer, the EPR effect only exists for a short duration postinfarction and thus insufficient for meaningful cardioprotection. Splenic monocytes are recruited to the heart in large numbers postinfarction, and are known to interact with platelets during circulation. Therefore, the strategy is to exploit this interaction by developing platelet-like proteoliposomes (PLPs), biomimicking platelet interactions with circulating monocytes. PLPs show strong binding affinity for monocytes but not for endothelial cells in vitro, mimicking normal platelet activity. Furthermore, intravital multiphoton imaging shows that comparing to plain liposomes, PLPs do not aggregate on uninjured endothelium but do accumulate at the injury site 72 h postinfarction. Importantly, PLPs enhance the targeting of anti-inflammatory drug, cobalt protoporphyrin, to the heart in an EPR-independent manner, which result in better therapeutic outcome.
All research investment has the goal of improving quality of life and health status. In recent years, the emerging technologies in nanomedicine research provide us a new frontier in the fight against human disease. By taking advantage of the unique physicochemical properties of nanoparticles (NPs), nanomedicine where drugs are blended into nanomaterials readily offers a wide range of applications in the tracing, diagnosis and treatment of disease. Although the application of therapeutic NPs is predominantly for cancer treatment, growing evidence has demonstrated the feasibility and potency of utilizing NPs for cardiovascular disease therapy. However, more consideration is required in this aspect due to limitations such as unfavorable particle retention in the contractile heart and the lack of cardiomyocyte markers for targeting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.