Objectives: With their broad spectrum of action, psychotropic drugs are among the most common medications prescribed to the elderly. Consequently, the number of older adults taking multiple psychotropic drugs has more than doubled over the last decade. To improve knowledge about the deleterious effects of psychotropic polypharmacy, we investigated whether there is a threshold number of psychotropic molecules that could lead to impairment of global cognition, executive function, or mobility. Furthermore, relationships between the number of psychotropic molecules and cognitive and mobility impairment were examined.
Design: Cross-sectional studySetting: University Hospital of Caen (France) and advertisements in medical offices Participants: Community-dwelling older adults 55 years and older (n = 177; 69.8 ± 9.3 years; 81% women) Measurements: Number of psychotropic molecules taken daily, global cognition assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), processing speed with the Trail Making Test (TMT) A, executive function with the TMT B and TMT B-A, and mobility with the Time Up and Go (TUG). The threshold numbers of psychotropic molecules were determined by ROC curves analysis. Based on these threshold values, multinomial logistic regression adjusting for covariates was then performed.Results: Logistic regressions showed that the threshold of two daily psychotropic molecules, identified by the ROC curves analysis, increases the risk of impaired executive function (p = .05 and.005 for the TMT B and TMT B-A, respectively), global cognition (p = .006 and.001 for the MMSE and MoCA, respectively), and mobility (p = .005 for the TUG), independent of confounding factors, including comorbidities. Furthermore, psychotropic polypharmacy would affect mobility through executive functions.Conclusion: Impairment of global cognition, executive function, and mobility when as few as two psychotropic molecules are consumed in relatively healthy young older adults should alert physicians when prescribing combinations of psychotropic medications.
Background and Objectives: Anticholinergic drugs are commonly prescribed in older adults despite growing evidence of their adverse outcomes. We aimed to improve knowledge about deleterious effects of anticholinergic drugs on both cognition and mobility, in particular whether there is a threshold value for the number of anticholinergic drugs or for the anticholinergic burden leading to mobility or cognitive impairment. Methods: 177 community-dwelling individuals aged 55 years or over, with a fall history in the previous year, took part in the study. Anticholinergic drugs were identified using the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), and global cognition and mobility were assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Time-Up-and-Go (TUG) test, respectively. Results: ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) curve analysis indicated that consumption of a single anticholinergic drug per day was a risk factor for impaired MMSE (p < .05) and TUG scores (p < .05). There was also a cut-off of anticholinergic burden of one for impaired MMSE scores (p < .05). Logistic regressions showed that impaired cognition induced by anticholinergic drugs were independent of confounding factors including comorbidities, while impaired mobility would be influenced by age and cardiac comorbidities. Conclusion: Daily consumption of a single anticholinergic drug, regardless of its anticholinergic burden, impairs both cognition and mobility community-dwelling seniors. Alternative solutions to anticholinergic drug prescription should thus be considered whenever possible.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.