The V600E BRAF mutation confers a worse prognosis to stage II and stage III colon cancer patients independently of disease stage and therapy.
Although direct sequencing is the gold standard for KRAS mutation detection in routine diagnostics, it remains laborious, time consuming, and not very sensitive. Our objective was to evaluate SNaPshot and the KRAS StripAssay as alternatives to sequencing for KRAS mutation detection in daily practice. KRAS exon 2-specific PCR followed by sequencing or by a SNaPshot reaction was performed. For the StripAssay, a mutant-enriched PCR was followed by hybridization to KRAS-specific probes bound to a nitrocellulose strip. To test sensitivities, dilution series of mutated DNA in wild-type DNA were made. Additionally, direct sequencing and SNaPshot were evaluated in 296 colon cancer samples. Detection limits of direct sequencing, SNaPshot, and StripAssay were 20%, 10%, and 1% tumor cells, respectively. Direct sequencing and SNaPshot can detect all 12 mutations in KRAS codons 12 and 13, whereas the StripAssay detects 10 of the most frequent ones. Workload and time to results are comparable for SNaPshot and direct sequencing. SNaPshot is flexible and easy to multiplex. The StripAssay is less time consuming for daily laboratory practice. SNaPshot is more flexible and slightly more sensitive than direct sequencing. The clinical evaluation showed comparable performances between direct sequencing and SNaPshot. The StripAssay is rapid and an extremely sensitive assay that could be considered when few tumor cells are available. However, found mutants should be confirmed to avoid risk of false positives.
Thymidylate synthase (TS) is a potentially valuable marker for therapy response since it is the molecular target of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). TS can be analyzed at the DNA (gene polymorphisms and amplification) and protein level (immunohistochemistry). This study investigated the predictive role of TS at the DNA and protein levels in patients with N 1 colon cancer (n 5 38). Tumor and normal tissues were genotyped using PCR for variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR), a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the 3R allele and a 6 bp deletion (1494del6) in the TS gene. Tumor tissues were additionally analyzed for loss of heterozygosity (VNTR polymorphism). A newly developed real time PCR assay was used to detect the presence of TS gene amplifications in tumor tissues. VNTR analysis in normal tissue was significantly associated with distant tumor recurrence (8% for 2R/2R vs. 52% for patients carrying a 3R allele, p 5 0.038) and cancer-specific survival (p 5 0.021). IHC was not found to be significantly associated with patients' outcome. No correlations between TS gene polymorphisms and IHC were found. However, TS gene amplification was correlated with a strong IHC staining intensity. In conclusion, this study indicates that DNA based analysis is more predictive for patientsÕ outcome than TS IHC. ' 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Key words: thymidylate synthase; polymorphism; 5-fluorouracil; colon cancer; gene amplification A substantial number of patients with colon cancer who received adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based therapy will not benefit from it. Therefore, predictive markers are needed in order to discriminate between responsive and nonresponsive patients. Thymidylate synthase (TS) is a central enzyme in DNA synthesis and is a potentially valuable marker since it is the molecular target of 5-FU. TS protein expression is affected by 3 different functional polymorphisms in the untranslated regions (UTRs) of the gene. Sensitivity to 5-FU based therapy might be largely influenced by the intracellular levels of the TS protein.TS protein levels can be studied directly by western blotting, enzyme activity assays, 1,2 ELISA 3,4 and immunohistochemistry (IHC). 5,6 The mainstream method is IHC because it is a relatively cheap, widely implemented technique that enables studying protein expression in situ. At the DNA level, TS protein expression is affected by different underlying functional polymorphisms as shown by several functional studies. [7][8][9][10][11][12] These polymorphisms are the following: a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) containing 2 (2R) or 3 (3R) repeats of 28 bp, 7 a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of a G to C substitution in the 3R allele 9 in the 5 0 UTR and a 6 bp deletion at nucleotide 1494 in the 3 0 UTR (1494del6). 12 Recently, a SNP of a G to C substitution in the first repeat of the 2R allele has also been found (hereafter referred to as the 2RC allele). 13,14 TS mRNA with 3 repeats has greater translation efficiency than mRNA with 2 repeats. 7,11 Individuals with a 3R/3R genotype will,...
In this study the detection of HER2 gene amplification was evaluated using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH; PathVysion) in comparison with Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), a PCR based technique. These two methods were evaluated on a series of 46 formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast carcinomas, previously tested for protein overexpression by HercepTest (grouped into Hercep 1+, 2+ and 3+). HER2 gene amplification (ratio ≥ 2.0) by FISH was found in 9/10, 10/30 and 0/6 in IHC 3+, 2+ and 1+/0 cases, respectively. Digitalized automated spot counting performed with recently developed CW4000 CytoFISH software was 100% concordant with manual FISH scoring. Using MLPA 18/46 samples showed a clear HER2 amplification. Comparing MLPA and IHC showed the same results as for FISH and IHC. All but one FISH positive cases (18/19) were confirmed by MLPA for the presence of the gene amplification. The overall concordance of detection of Her2 gene amplification by FISH and MLPA was 98% (45/46). Furthermore, both the level of amplification and equivocal results correlated well between both methods. In conclusion, MLPA is a reliable and reproducible technique and can be used as an either alternative or additional test to determine HER2 status in breast carcinomas.
Kinetic hybridization measurements on a microarray are expected to become a valuable tool for genotyping applications. A method has been developed that enables kinetic hybridization measurements of PCR products on a low-density microarray. This is accomplished by pumping a solution containing PCR products up and down through a porous microarray substrate. After every pumping cycle, the fluorescently labeled PCR products hybridized to capture probes immobilized on the solid surface of the porous microarray substrate are measured. By this method, both binding curves and high-resolution melting curves are obtained instead of the single endpoint hybridization intensities as with commonly used post-PCR array-based hybridization techniques. We used 20 subtypes of the human papillomavirus (HPV) as a model system to test our detection method and blindly analyzed 216 clinical samples. We compared our microarray flowthrough method with a reference method, PCR followed by a reverse line blot (RLB). Real-time hybridization measurements followed by high-resolution melting curves of low concentrations of fluorescently labeled HPV targets on a microarray were successfully carried out without any additional chemical signal amplification. The results of our new method were in good agreement (93%, with a kappa coefficient of ؍ 0.88 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.94]) with the RLB results. All discrepant samples were analyzed by a third method, enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Furthermore, in a number of cases, we were able to identify false-positive samples by making use of the information contained in the kinetic binding and melting curves. This clearly demonstrates the added value of the use of kinetic measurements and high-resolution melting curves, especially for highly homologous targets.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.