2008
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thymidylate synthase genotyping is more predictive for therapy response than immunohistochemistry in patients with colon cancer

Abstract: Thymidylate synthase (TS) is a potentially valuable marker for therapy response since it is the molecular target of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). TS can be analyzed at the DNA (gene polymorphisms and amplification) and protein level (immunohistochemistry). This study investigated the predictive role of TS at the DNA and protein levels in patients with N 1 colon cancer (n 5 38). Tumor and normal tissues were genotyped using PCR for variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR), a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our population size was comparable with that of other similar studies and genotype classifications reflected the best available information on gene biological activity. In this respect, literature data are inconclusive in that the same TS polymorphisms have been correlated with both favourable and unfavourable effects, and no correlation has even been reported (Dotor et al, 2006;Gusella and Padrini, 2007;Gosens et al, 2008;Fernandez-Contreras et al, 2009). Besides the methodological ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our population size was comparable with that of other similar studies and genotype classifications reflected the best available information on gene biological activity. In this respect, literature data are inconclusive in that the same TS polymorphisms have been correlated with both favourable and unfavourable effects, and no correlation has even been reported (Dotor et al, 2006;Gusella and Padrini, 2007;Gosens et al, 2008;Fernandez-Contreras et al, 2009). Besides the methodological ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3A and B). Although, in a previous publication we reported a predictive value for the VNTR [12], only a small number of patients were studied at that time and the apparently contradictory results could be explained by the difference in patient numbers between studies. In the present larger cohort of patients, we were not able to reproduce our previous results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…1), TS protein expression quantitation, TS gene amplification and loss of heterozygosity in predicting 5-FU therapy response [12]. From these results, it seemed that genotyping of the 5 -untraslated region polymorphism of the TS gene was more reliable for predicting response to therapy than protein expression, as determined by IHC and than genotyping the rest of polymorphisms in the 3 -UTR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Finally, TS mRNA transcription and translation could be influenced by the TS gene promoter enhancer region [16,17]. Recently TS genetic polymorphism in 5 0 -promoter enhancer region (5 0 -TSER) and 3 0 -untranslated region (3 0 -TSUTR) in either tumor or normal tissues have been found to be independent prognostic indicators in colorectal cancer patients [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%