Background and Purpose-Despite well-documented discrepancies in many clinical conditions across insurance groups, limited research has examined insurance-related disparities for patients with stroke. This study examined the relationship between insurance status and hospital care for patients with stroke. Methods-Discharges with intracerebral hemorrhage and acute ischemic stroke were abstracted from the 2002 National Inpatient Sample. Neurologic impairment status and mortality were examined. Results-Compared with privately insured patients, uninsured patients had a higher level of neurologic impairment, a longer average length of hospital stay, and higher mortality risk. For patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and acute ischemic stroke, mortality risk of uninsured patients was approximately 24% and 56% higher, respectively, than that of their privately insured peers. Conclusions-Policy should promote access to outpatient and preventive care for uninsured patients so risk factors such as hypertension can be detected and treated during early, asymptomatic stages. Further research is needed to evaluate the extent to which differences in outcomes are attributable to differences in severity level on admission.
Although many perspectives on the impact of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) on health services research have been wide spread, little empirical evidence has been reported about HIPAA-related barriers during the implementation of research projects. Using three cases of health services research projects, this study examined practical barriers created by HIPAA regulation. During the stage of implementation of the three projects, we experienced some HIPAA-related concerns, previously raised in the field of health services research. We found that technically complicated consent forms and privacy protection forms as well as socially-sensitive clinical conditions make patients less willing to participate in research projects; concerns about safety of patient medical information makes health organizations more hesitant to let researchers have access to the patient's information, especially through electronic transfer; more restrictive IRB processes and challenging patient recruiting processes make health services researchers reluctant to go through the process; and as a result, they may compromise with the scientific soundness of the project. Overall, HIPAA complicates the research process and requires more resources and longer time to conduct research.
Few studies have evaluated racial disparities with respect to process and outcome measures for pneumonia. We evaluated disparities with respect to process measures in addition to clinical and financial outcome measures in a pediatric population from 0 to 18 years of age. The data showed that minority populations were admitted at younger ages and were more likely to be admitted through the emergency department than their white counterparts. Substantial variation exists with respect to patterns of care and outcomes for pneumonia in pediatric patients among different ethnic/racial groups. Differences in outcomes may be associated with several factors, including variations in quality of care across different hospital settings, characteristics related to disease severity among different ethnic groups, and other unidentified factors. Further research is needed to clearly define how differences with respect to quality of care, access to care, disease severity, and care-seeking behaviors contribute to differences in outcomes across different ethnic groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.