[1] The quality of the retrieved temperature-versus-pressure (or T(p)) profiles is described for the middle atmosphere for the publicly available Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) Version 1.07 (V1.07) data set. The primary sources of systematic error for the SABER results below about 70 km are (1) errors in the measured radiances, (2) biases in the forward model, and (3) uncertainties in the corrections for ozone and in the determination of the reference pressure for the retrieved profiles. Comparisons with other correlative data sets indicate that SABER T(p) is too high by 1-3 K in the lower stratosphere but then too low by 1 K near the stratopause and by 2 K in the middle mesosphere. There is little difference between the local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) algorithm results below about 70 km from V1.07 and V1.06, but there are substantial improvements/differences for the non-LTE results of V1.07 for the upper mesosphere and lower thermosphere (UMLT) region. In particular, the V1.07 algorithm uses monthly, diurnally averaged CO 2 profiles versus latitude from the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model. This change has improved the consistency of the character of the tides in its kinetic temperature (T k ). The T k profiles agree with UMLT values obtained from ground-based measurements of column-averaged OH and O 2 emissions and of the Na lidar returns, at least within their mutual uncertainties. SABER T k values obtained near the mesopause with its daytime algorithm also agree well with the falling sphere climatology at high northern latitudes in summer. It is concluded that the SABER data set can be the basis for improved, diurnal-to-interannual-scale temperatures for the middle atmosphere and especially for its UMLT region.Citation: Remsberg, E. E., et al. (2008), Assessment of the quality of the Version 1.07 temperature-versus-pressure profiles of the middle atmosphere from TIMED/SABER,

[1] Microwave Limb Sounder and Sounding of the Atmosphere with Broadband Emission Radiometry data provide the first opportunity to characterize the four-dimensional stratopause evolution throughout the life-cycle of a major stratospheric sudden warming (SSW). The polar stratopause, usually higher than that at midlatitudes, dropped by $30 km and warmed during development of a major ''wave 1'' SSW in January 2006, with accompanying mesospheric cooling. When the polar vortex broke down, the stratopause cooled and became ill-defined, with a nearly isothermal stratosphere. After the polar vortex started to recover in the upper stratosphere/lower mesosphere (USLM), a cool stratopause reformed above 75 km, then dropped and warmed; both the mesosphere above and the stratosphere below cooled at this time. The polar stratopause remained separated from that at midlatitudes across the core of the polar night jet. In the early stages of the SSW, the strongly tilted (westward with increasing altitude) polar vortex extended into the mesosphere, and enclosed a secondary temperature maximum extending westward and slightly equatorward from the highest altitude part of the polar stratopause over the cool stratopause near the vortex edge. The temperature evolution in the USLM resulted in strongly enhanced radiative cooling in the mesosphere during the recovery from the SSW, but significantly reduced radiative cooling in the upper stratosphere. Assimilated meteorological analyses from the European Centre for Medium-Range weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and Goddard Earth Observing System Version 5.0.1 (GEOS-5), which are not constrained by data at polar stratopause altitudes and have model tops near 80 km, could not capture the secondary temperature maximum or the high stratopause after the SSW; they also misrepresent polar temperature structure during and after the stratopause breakdown, leading to large biases in their radiative heating rates. ECMWF analyses represent the stratospheric temperature structure more accurately, suggesting a better representation of vertical motion; GEOS-5 analyses more faithfully describe stratopause level wind and wave amplitudes. The high-quality satellite temperature data used here provide the first daily, global, multiannual data sets suitable for assessing and, eventually, improving representation of the USLM in models and assimilation systems.

Abstract. Ten data sets coveting the period 1954-2000 are analyzed to show a 1%/yr increase in stratospheric water vapor. The trend has persister for at least 45 years, hence is unl•ely the result of a single event, but rather indicative of long-term climate change. A long-term change in the transport ofwater vapor into the stratosphere is the most probable cause.

International audienceIn recent times it has become increasingly clear thatreleases of trace gases from human activity have a potentialfor causing change in the upper atmosphere. However,our knowledge of systematic changes and trends inthe temperature of the mesosphere and lower thermosphereis relatively limited compared to the Earths loweratmosphere, and not much effort has been made to synthesizethese results so far. In this article, a comprehensivereview of long-term trends in the temperature of the regionfrom 50 to 100 km is made on the basis of the availableup-to-date understanding of measurements and model calculations.An objective evaluation of the available datasets is attempted, and important uncertainly factors arediscussed. Some natural variability factors, which arelikely to play a role in modulating temperature trends,are also briefly touched upon. There are a growing numberof experimental results centered on, or consistent with,zero temperature trend in the mesopause region (80–100km). The most reliable data sets show no significant trendbut an uncertainty of at least 2 K/decade. On the otherhand, a majority of studies indicate negative trends inthe lower and middle mesosphere with an amplitude ofa few degrees (2–3 K) per decade. In tropical latitudesthe cooling trend increases in the upper mesosphere.The most recent general circulation models indicateincreased cooling closer to both poles in the middlemesosphere and a decrease in cooling toward the summerpole in the upper mesosphere. Quantitatively, thesimulated cooling trend in the middle mesosphere producedonly by CO₂ increase is usually below the observedlevel. However, including other greenhouse gasesand taking into account a “thermal shrinking” of theupper atmosphere result in a cooling of a few degreesper decade. This is close to the lower limit of the observednonzero trends. In the mesopause region, recentmodel simulations produce trends, usually below 1 K/decade,that appear to be consistent with most observationsin this regio

No abstract