Background Microfluidic devices are being used for phenotypic screening of zebrafish larvae in fundamental and pre‐clinical research. A challenge for the broad use of these microfluidic devices is their low throughput, especially in behavioral assays. Previously, we introduced the tail locomotion of a semi‐mobile zebrafish larva evoked on‐demand with electric signal in a microfluidic device. Here, we report the lessons learned for increasing the number of specimens from one to four larvae in this device. Methods and Results Multiple parameters including loading and testing time per fish and loading and orientation efficiencies were refined to optimize the performance of modified designs. Flow and electric field simulations within the final device provided insight into the flow behavior and functionality of traps when compared to previous single‐larva devices. Outcomes led to a new design which decreased the testing time per larva by ≈60%. Further, loading and orientation efficiencies increased by more than 80%. Critical behavioral parameters such as response duration and tail beat frequency were similar in both single and quadruple‐fish devices. Conclusion The developed microfluidic device has significant advantages for greater throughput and efficiency when behavioral phenotyping is required in various applications, including chemical testing in toxicology and gene screening.
Multi-phenotypic screening of zebrafish larvae, such as monitoring the heart and tail activities, is important in biological assays. Microfluidic devices have been developed for zebrafish phenotypic assays, but simultaneous lateral–dorsal screening of the same larva in a single chip is yet to be achieved. We present a multi-phenotypic microfluidic device for monitoring of tail movement and heart rate (HR) of 5–7-day postfertilization zebrafish larvae. Tail movements were stimulated using electric current and quantified in terms of response duration (RD) and tail beat frequency (TBF). The positioning of a right-angle prism provided a lateral view of the larvae and enabled HR monitoring. Investigations were performed on zebrafish larvae exposed to 3% ethanol, 250 μM 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) or 1 mM levodopa. Larvae exposed to ethanol showed a significant drop in HR, whereas electric stimulation increased the HR temporarily. Larvae experienced a significant drop in RD, TBF and HR when exposed to 6-OHDA. HR was not affected by levodopa post-treatment, whereas RD and TBF were restored to normal levels. The results showed potential for applications that involve monitoring of cardiac and behavioral parameters in zebrafish larvae. Tests can be done using the same chip, without changing the larvae’s orientation. This eliminates undue stress caused by reorientation, which may affect their behavior, and the use of separate devices to obtain dorsal and lateral views. The device can be implemented to improve multi-phenotypic and quantitative screening of zebrafish larvae in response to chemical and physical stimuli in different zebrafish disease models.
The signaling molecular mechanisms in zebrafish response to electricity are unknown, so here we asked if changes to dopaminergic signaling pathways can affect their electrically-evoked locomotion. To answer this question, the effects of multiple selective and non-selective dopamine compounds on the electric response of zebrafish larvae is investigated. A microfluidic device with enhanced control of experimentation with multiple larvae is used, which features a novel design to immobilize four zebrafish larvae in parallel and expose them to electric current that induces tail locomotion. In 6 days post-fertilization zebrafish larvae, the electric induced locomotor response is quantified in terms of the tail movement duration and beating frequency to discern the effect of non-lethal concentrations of dopaminergic agonists (apomorphine, SKF-81297, and quinpirole), and antagonists (butaclamol, SCH-23390, and haloperidol). All dopamine antagonists decrease locomotor activity, while dopamine agonists do not induce similar behaviours in larvae. The D2- like selective dopamine agonist quinpirole enhances movement. However, exposure to non-selective and D1-selective dopamine agonists apomorphine and SKF-81297 cause no significant change in the electric response. Exposing larvae that were pre-treated with butaclamol and haloperidol to apomorphine and quinpirole, respectively, restores electric locomotion. The results demonstrate a correlation between electric response and the dopamine signalling pathway. We propose that the electrofluidic assay has profound application potential as a chemical screening method when investigating biological pathways, behaviors, and brain disorders.
In tissues with mechanical function, the regulation of remodeling and repair processes is often controlled by mechanosensitive mechanisms; damage to the tissue structure is detected by changes in mechanical stress and strain, stimulating matrix synthesis and repair. While this mechanoregulatory feedback process is well recognized in animals and plants, it is not known whether such a process occurs in bacteria. In Vibrio cholerae, antibiotic-induced damage to the load-bearing cell wall promotes increased signaling by the two-component system VxrAB, which stimulates cell wall synthesis. Here we show that changes in mechanical stress and strain within the cell envelope are sufficient to stimulate VxrAB signaling in the absence of antibiotics. We applied mechanical forces to individual bacteria using three distinct loading modalities: extrusion loading within a microfluidic device, compression, and hydrostatic pressure. In all three cases, VxrAB signaling, as indicated by a fluorescent protein reporter, was increased in cells submitted to greater magnitudes of mechanical loading, hence diverse forms of mechanical stimuli activate VxrAB signaling. Mechanosensitivity of VxrAB signaling was lost following removal of the VxrAB stimulating endopeptidase ShyA, suggesting that VxrAB may not be directly sensing mechanical forces, but instead relies on other factors including lytic enzymes in the periplasmic space. Our findings suggest that mechanical signals play an important role in regulating cell wall homeostasis in bacteria.Significance StatementBiological materials with mechanical function (bones, muscle, etc.) are often maintained through mechanosensitive mechanisms, in which damage-induced reductions in stiffness stimulate remodeling and repair processes that restore mechanical function. Here we show that a similar process can occur in bacteria. We find that mechanical stresses in the bacterial cell envelope (the primary load-bearing structure in bacteria) regulate signaling of a two-component system involved in cell wall synthesis. These findings suggest that the mechanical stress state within the cell envelope can contribute to cell wall homeostasis. Furthermore, these findings demonstrate the potential to use mechanical stimuli to regulate gene expression in bacteria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.