Levy (1964Levy ( , 1967 has proposed an information-processing model for explammg group impression formation He suggests that persons form their impressions of groups by regardmg a given array of mformabon as representmg a sample of the total possible mformation constitutmg the stimulus One scMirce of mformation is the vanance of the dimensions constitutmg the stimulus To study the effects of vanance on reactions to a group. Levy (1964) asked subjects to mdicate their preferences for one of two groups, each of which was represented by a set of five facial photographs The mchvidual members of the sets were scaled on vanous chmensions but differed m vanance Levy found that subjects chose sets wilh a higher vanance when both sets had high, favorable values, whereas no vanance preference appeared when the sets had moderate or low favorability values Rule and Renner (1968) extrapolated from Levy's notions m their attempt to account for mconsistent results of the effects of group vanance on conformity In their studies (Rule, 1964, Rule and Renner, 1965, Rule and Renner, 1968 subjects were exposed to the alleged opmions of four other group members, and change m the direction of the group opmion was measured The distnbution of gronp responses vaned m terms of chspersion Rule (1964) and Rule and Renner (1965) demonstrated that subject conformed more to groups whose members' judgments were less dispersed, whereas Rule and Renner (1968) found that subjects conformed more to groups whose members' judgments were more dispersed These authors proposed that the mconsistent results 1 This research is a partial summary of a tiiesis submitted to the Department of Psychology m partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master's degree by the semor author, under the direction of the second author
Undergraduate men who held neutral positions on a variety of issues were exposed to peer-group opinions whose semantic wording was varied to present either a positive or negative context. Two replications of the procedure using statements of different contents were conducted (each sample n = 40); a 2 × 2 factorial design was used for both replications where the independent variables were direction of semantic wording (positive or negative) and direction of influence from peer ratings (for agreement or disagreement). Support was found for an interaction of the two independent variables wherein conformity increased as a function of congruity between direction of peer opinions and semantic context of stimulus-wording.
A forced compliance paradigm was used to vary two levels of task experience and four levels of feedback about the results of Ss' counter-attitudinal task descriptions. Task-experience affected differential modes of dissonance-resolution following the description, but contrary to predictions, increasing information about effects of the counter-attitudinal descriptions failed to increase evidence of dissonance-resolution.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.