The aggregation and deposition of the amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) in the brain has been linked with neuronal death, which progresses in the diagnostic and pathological signs of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The transition of an unstructured monomeric peptide into self-assembled and more structured aggregates is the crucial conversion from what appears to be a harmless polypeptide into a malignant form that causes synaptotoxicity and neuronal cell death. Despite efforts to identify the toxic form of Aβ, the development of effective treatments for AD is still limited by the highly transient and dynamic nature of interconverting forms of Aβ. The variability within the in vivo “pool” of different Aβ peptides is another complicating factor. Here we review the dynamical interplay between various components that influence the heterogeneous Aβ system, from intramolecular Aβ flexibility to intermolecular dynamics between various Aβ alloforms and external factors. The complex dynamics of Aβ contributes to the causative role of Aβ in the pathogenesis of AD.

a b s t r a c tAggregated forms of the amyloid-b peptide are hypothesized to act as the prime toxic agents in Alzheimer disease (AD). The in vivo amyloid-b peptide pool consists of both C-and N-terminally truncated or mutated peptides, and the composition thereof significantly determines AD risk. Other variations, such as biotinylation, are introduced as molecular tools to aid the understanding of disease mechanisms. Since these modifications have the potential to alter key aggregation properties of the amyloid-b peptide, we present a comparative study of the aggregation of a substantial set of the most common in vivo identified and in vitro produced amyloid-b peptides. Structured summary of protein interactions:Amyloid beta and Amyloid beta bind by fluorescence technology (View Interaction: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Amyloid beta and Amyloid beta bind by transmission electron microscopy (View Interaction: 1, 2) Amyloid beta and Amyloid beta bind by filter binding (View Interaction: 1,2,3)

Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype determines Alzheimer's disease (AD) susceptibility, with the APOE ε4 allele being an established risk factor for late‐onset AD. The ApoE lipidation status has been reported to impact amyloid‐beta (Aβ) peptide metabolism. The details of how lipidation affects ApoE behavior remain to be elucidated. In this study, we prepared lipid‐free and lipid‐bound ApoE particles, mimicking the high‐density lipoprotein particles found in vivo, for all three isoforms (ApoE2, ApoE3, and ApoE4) and biophysically characterized them. We find that lipid‐free ApoE in solution has the tendency to aggregate in vitro in an isoform‐dependent manner under near‐physiological conditions and that aggregation is impeded by lipidation of ApoE.

Most Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cases are late-onset and characterized by the aggregation and deposition of the amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide in extracellular plaques in the brain. However, a few rare and hereditary Aβ mutations, such as the Italian Glu22-to-Lys (E22K) mutation, guarantee the development of early-onset familial AD. This type of AD is associated with a younger age at disease onset, increased β-amyloid accumulation, and Aβ deposition in cerebral blood vessel walls, giving rise to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). It remains largely unknown how the Italian mutation results in the clinical phenotype that is characteristic of CAA. We therefore investigated how this single point mutation may affect the aggregation of Aβ1–42 in vitro and structurally characterized the resulting fibrils using a biophysical approach. This paper reports that wild-type and Italian-mutant Aβ both form fibrils characterized by the cross-β architecture, but with distinct β-sheet organizations, resulting in differences in thioflavin T fluorescence and solvent accessibility. E22K Aβ1–42 oligomers and fibrils both display an antiparallel β-sheet structure, in comparison with the parallel β-sheet structure of wild-type fibrils, characteristic of most amyloid fibrils described in the literature. Moreover, we demonstrate structural plasticity for Italian-mutant Aβ fibrils in a pH-dependent manner, in terms of their underlying β-sheet arrangement. These findings are of interest in the ongoing debate that (1) antiparallel β-sheet structure might represent a signature for toxicity, which could explain the higher toxicity reported for the Italian mutant, and that (2) fibril polymorphism might underlie differences in disease pathology and clinical manifestation.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00018-015-1983-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is a forefront actor in the transport of lipids and the maintenance of cholesterol homeostasis, and is also strongly implicated in Alzheimer’s disease. Upon lipid-binding apoE adopts a conformational state that mediates the receptor-induced internalization of lipoproteins. Due to its inherent structural dynamics and the presence of lipids, the structure of the biologically active apoE remains so far poorly described. To address this issue, we developed an innovative hybrid method combining experimental data with molecular modeling and dynamics to generate comprehensive models of the lipidated apoE4 isoform. Chemical cross-linking combined with mass spectrometry provided distance restraints, characterizing the three-dimensional organization of apoE4 molecules at the surface of lipidic nanoparticles. The ensemble of spatial restraints was then rationalized in an original molecular modeling approach to generate monomeric models of apoE4 that advocated the existence of two alternative conformations. These two models point towards an activation mechanism of apoE4 relying on a regulation of the accessibility of its receptor binding region. Further, molecular dynamics simulations of the dimerized and lipidated apoE4 monomeric conformations revealed an elongation of the apoE N-terminal domain, whereby helix 4 is rearranged, together with Arg172, into a proper orientation essential for lipoprotein receptor association. Overall, our results show how apoE4 adapts its conformation for the recognition of the low density lipoprotein receptor and we propose a novel mechanism of activation for apoE4 that is based on accessibility and remodeling of the receptor binding region.

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) binds the amyloid β peptide (Aβ), one of the major culprits in Alzheimer's disease development. The formation of apoE:Aβ complexes is implicated in both Aβ clearance and fibrillization. However, the binding interface between apoE and Aβ is poorly defined despite substantial previous research efforts, and the exact role of apoE in the pathology of Alzheimer's disease remains largely elusive. Here, we compared the three main isoforms of apoE (E2, E3, and E4) for their interaction with Aβ1-42 in an early stage of aggregation and at near physiological conditions. Using electron microscopy and Western blots, we showed that all three isoforms are able to prevent Aβ fibrillization and form a noncovalent complex, with one molecule of Aβ bound per apoE. Using chemical cross-linking coupled to mass spectrometry, we further examined the interface of interaction between apoE2/3/4 and Aβ. Multiple high-confidence intermolecular apoE2/3/4:Aβ cross-links confirmed that Lys16 is located in the region of Aβ binding to apoE2/3/4. Further, we demonstrated that both N- and C-terminal domains of apoE2/3/4 are interacting with Aβ. The cross-linked sites were mapped onto and evaluated in light of a recent structure of apoE. Our results support binding of the hydrophobic Aβ at the apoE domain-domain interaction interface, which would explain how apoE is able to stabilize Aβ and thereby prevent its subsequent aggregation.

No abstract

No abstract