Bovine pericardium, a dense collagenous connective tissue, was crosslinked with glutaraldehyde using different modalities of fixation. The degree of crosslinking was evaluated as a function of the ability of CNBr and pronase to solubilize collagen. Our results suggest that glutaraldehyde fixes primarily the surface of the fibers and creates a polymeric network which hinders the further crosslinking of the interstitium of the fiber. When a low concentration of glutaraldehyde was used, a slow time-dependent crosslinking process was observed. This slow process is maintained over a long period of time, greatly beyond that required for the actual penetration of glutaraldehyde to occur.
Patients with small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) rarely present with pleural effusions. Based on morphology alone, recognition of SCLC in effusion cytology may be challenging because of the resemblance of neoplastic cells to lymphocytes. Immunocytochemistry may be helpful in its diagnosis. The objective of this study was to review the morphology and evaluate the use of immunocytochemistry in diagnosing SCLC in pleural fluids. Patients with SCLC who presented with pleural effusions were identified during a 6-yr period. The cytology and medical records were reviewed. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell blocks of fluid specimens were immunostained with neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin A and synatophysin), cytokeratin 20 (CK20), and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1). The latter is a nuclear transcription protein that is expressed in normal respiratory epithelium and also in more than 90% of SCLCs. Of the 256 patients diagnosed with SCLC during the study period, 8 (2.7%) patients (3 females and 4 males, age range from 56-85 yr) also developed pleural effusions. One patient had 2 fluid specimens during the course of their disease, giving a total of 9 specimens. Four specimens had a positive cytologic diagnosis of SCLC, and 2 were initially diagnosed as suspicious for SCLC. The remaining 3 specimens were negative for SCLS. The specimens with a positive or suspicious diagnosis showed single and aggregates of small to medium-sized single cells with a high nuclear:cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio, round to angulated nuclei, and salt-and-pepper chromatin. Nuclear molding was also noted. Five out of 6 (83%) specimens with a positive or suspicious diagnosis of SCLC were positive for both chromogranin A and TTF-1. Synaptophysin was positive in 3 of 6 (50%) positive or suspicious cases. None of the cases were positive for CK20. All cases with a negative cytologic diagnosis were negative for chromogranin A, synatophysin, CK20, and TTF-1. In conclusion, patients with SCLC rarely present with pleural effusions. The cytology of SCLC is characteristic. The use of immunocytochemistry, particularly with antibodies to chromogranin A, TTF-1, and CK 20, aids in the differential diagnosis.
The relevance of 8 contemporary classification and grading systems for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast was examined in 100 tumors by comparing DCIS grade with grade of the concurrent infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC). Besides tumor size and nodal status, the immunohistochemical parameters in both lesions were compared, including estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, c-erbB-2 protein, E-cadherin, vimentin, Ki-67 (MIB1), and p27. Nuclear grading of DCIS alone or in combination with architectural pattern and necrosis showed the best correlation with grade of the invasive component. There also was a positive correlation between every biologic marker expressed in DCIS and in the concurrent IDC, supporting a clonal relationship. Biologic markers varied between the different grades of DCIS. DCIS is heterogeneous, and the progression of DCIS to IDC may be from low-grade DCIS to low-grade IDC and high-grade DCIS to high-grade IDC. This concept is different from the conventional model held for intraepithelial neoplasia in the cervix, vulva, vagina, and skin, in which there is increasing severity of in situ atypia (dysplasia) before the development of stromal invasion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.