Aim Values and value hierarchies play an important role in different health and counselling settings. Since personal values underlie our actions, guide our decisions and influence interactions, they can be assumed to influence doctor-patient relationships and therefore especially counselling situations. The aim of our study is to provide a sound empirical contribution to the increasing literature on values in health care settings. Subject and methods This article focusses on the personal values of professional groups involved in the medical and psychosocial care of patients or clients with genetic concerns. Results from 120 survey respondents who completed the Schwartz value survey reveal differences between the professional groups in their value hierarchies. Results There is a widespread, pan-cultural similarity regarding value hierarchies. Our results are in accordance with this universal hierarchy but show slight differences between the professional groups of the sample: Medical professionals ranked achievement and power values significantly higher. Psychosocial professionals, on the other hand, ranked universalism and hedonism values significantly higher than medical professionals. Conclusion Values motivate actions and serve as standards to evaluate them. As they can be presumed to influence the doctor-patient relationship and health care decisions, it is worth discussing differences in values and value hierarchies. Particular attention to that topic might be of interest for training and further education.
The original article contains an error in the following paragraph (page 258, column 1, paragraph 2):Among the psychosocial professionals, 26 % (n = 5) considered values to have no influence on the counselling session; 47 % (n = 9) saw values as somewhat influential, 21 % (n = 4) estimated the influence rather high, and one person (5 %) considered values to have a very high influence on the counselling.The corrected version should be:Among the psychosocial professionals, no one considered values to have no influence at all on the counselling session; 26 % (n = 5) viewed values as somewhat not influential on the counselling session, 47 % (n = 9) saw values as somewhat influential, 21 % (n = 4) estimated the influence rather high, and one person (5 %) considered values to have a very high influence on the counselling.The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.