Background There has been a shift in recent years to using ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as first-line investigations for suspected cranial large vessel vasculitis (LVV) and is a new recommendation by the EULAR 2018 guidelines for imaging in LVV. This cross-sectional study compares the performance of US and MRI and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for detecting vasculitis in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). Methods Patients with new-onset or already diagnosed GCA were recruited. The common temporal arteries and supra-aortic large vessels were evaluated by US and MRI/MRA. Blinded experts read the images and applied a dichotomous score (vasculitis: yes/no) in each vessel. Results Thirty-seven patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) were recruited. Two patients were excluded. Of the remaining patients, nine had new-onset disease and 26 had established disease. Mean age was 71 years, and median C-reactive protein (CRP) was 7.5 mg/L. The median time between US and MRI was 1 day. Overall, US revealed vasculitic changes more frequently than MRI (p < 0.001). US detected vascular changes in 37% of vessels compared to 21% with MRI. Among patients with chronic disease, US detected vascular changes in 23% of vessels compared to 7% with MRI in (p < 0.001). The same was true for patients with new-onset disease. US detected vasculitic changes in 22% of vessels and MRI detected disease in 6% (p = 0.0004). Compared to contrast-enhanced MRA, US was more sensitive in detecting vasculitic changes in the large arteries, including the axillary, carotid, and subclavian arteries. Conclusion US more frequently detects vasculitic changes in the large arteries compared to contrast-enhanced MRA. When evaluating the cranial vessels, US performs similarly to MRI. This data supports the recommendation that US be considered as a first-line evaluation in patients suspected to have GCA.

Objective.To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the ultrasonographic (US) assessment of subtalar joint (STJ) synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods.Following a Delphi process, 12 sonographers conducted an US reliability exercise on 10 RA patients with hindfoot pain. The anteromedial, posteromedial, and posterolateral STJ was assessed using B-mode and power Doppler (PD) techniques according to an agreed US protocol and using a 4-grade semiquantitative grading score for synovitis [synovial hypertrophy (SH) and signal] and a dichotomous score for the presence of joint effusion (JE). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were computed by Cohen’s and Light’s κ. Weighted κ coefficients with absolute weighting were computed for B-mode and PD signal.Results.Mean weighted Cohen’s κ for SH, PD, and JE were 0.80 (95% CI 0.62–0.98), 0.61 (95% CI 0.48–0.73), and 0.52 (95% CI 0.36–0.67), respectively. Weighted Cohen’s κ for SH, PD, and JE in the anteromedial, posteromedial, and posterolateral STJ were −0.04 to 0.79, 0.42–0.95, and 0.28–0.77; 0.31–1, −0.05 to 0.65, and −0.2 to 0.69; 0.66–1, 0.52–1, and 0.42–0.88, respectively. Weighted Light’s κ for SH was 0.67 (95% CI 0.58–0.74), 0.46 (95% CI 0.35–0.59) for PD, and 0.16 (95% CI 0.08–0.27) for JE. Weighted Light’s κ for SH, PD, and JE were 0.63 (95% CI 0.45–0.82), 0.33 (95% CI 0.19–0.42), and 0.09 (95% CI −0.01 to 0.19), for the anteromedial; 0.49 (95% CI 0.27–0.64), 0.35 (95% CI 0.27–0.4), and 0.04 (95% CI −0.06 to 0.1) for posteromedial; and 0.82 (95% CI 0.75–0.89), 0.66 (95% CI 0.56–0.8), and 0.18 (95% CI 0.04–0.34) for posterolateral STJ, respectively.Conclusion.Using a multisite assessment, US appears to be a reliable tool for assessing synovitis of STJ in RA.

Objective. We developed a fast-track clinic (FTC) to expedite the evaluation of patients suspected of having giant cell arteritis (GCA) using vascular ultrasound. Though FTCs have demonstrated efficacy in Europe, no protocolized clinic in the United States has been developed. This study introduces a new FTC model unique to the United States, using vascular sonographers, and describes the protocols used to develop reliable findings. We evaluate clinical outcomes using vascular ultrasound and temporal artery biopsy (TAB).Methods. A retrospective review included all subjects referred to the University of Washington FTC aged 50 years old or older who received both ultrasound and TAB between November 2017 and November 2019. Ultrasound was performed by a vascular sonographer trained in GCA detection. Ultrasound results were read by a vascular surgeon and reviewed by four rheumatologists certified in musculoskeletal ultrasound who had completed a course in vascular ultrasound use in GCA and large-vessel vasculitis.Results. A total of 43 subjects underwent both vascular ultrasound and TAB. Six subjects had both positive ultrasound and TAB results. There were also seven positive ultrasound results in patients with negative TAB results, most due to detection of large-vessel GCA (LV-GCA). All 29 subjects with negative ultrasound results had negative TAB results.Conclusion. This is the first study in the United States to demonstrate a reliable FTC protocol using vascular sonographers. This protocol demonstrated good agreement between ultrasound and TAB and allowed for the detection of additional cases of LV-GCA by vascular ultrasound. Vascular ultrasound improved the rate of GCA diagnosis primarily by detecting additional cases of LV-GCA.

ObjectiveVascular ultrasound has been increasingly used to diagnose giant cell arteritis (GCA). The temporal and axillary arteries are commonly evaluated. However, the usefulness of including the subclavian artery remains unclear. This study investigated whether inclusion of the subclavian artery in addition to the temporal and axillary arteries in the ultrasound evaluation of GCA improves the accuracy of the examination beyond ultrasonography of the temporal and axillary arteries alone.MethodsWe formed a fast-track clinic to use ultrasound to rapidly evaluate patients with suspected GCA. In this cohort study, patients referred for new concern for GCA received a vascular ultrasound for GCA. Subclavian intima-media thickness (IMT) cutoffs of 1.0 and 1.5 mm were retrospectively assessed.ResultsTwo hundred thirty-seven patients were referred to the fast-track clinic from November 2017 to August 2021. One hundred sixty-eight patients received an ultrasound for concern for new GCA. With a subclavian IMT cutoff of 1.5 mm, inclusion of the subclavian artery did not identify any patients with GCA who were not otherwise found to have positive temporal and/or axillary artery examinations, and at this cutoff, there was 1 false-positive result. A subclavian IMT cutoff of 1.0 mm identified several subjects diagnosed with GCA who had otherwise negative ultrasounds, but most subjects with an isolated subclavian IMT greater than 1.0 mm had false-positive results, and the specificity of this cutoff was poor.ConclusionInclusion of the subclavian artery in the ultrasound assessment of GCA at 2 different cutoffs rarely contributed to the accurate diagnosis of GCA and increased the rate of false-positive results.