Economic evaluations using Real World Data (RWD) has been increasing in the very recent years, however, this source of information has several advantages and limitations. The aim of this review was to assess the quality of full economic evaluations (EE) developed using RWD. A systematic review was carried out through articles from the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Included were studies that employed RWD for both costs and effectiveness. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Of the 14,011 studies identified, 93 were included. Roughly half of the studies were carried out in a hospital setting. The most frequently assessed illnesses were neoplasms while the most evaluated interventions were pharmacological. The main source of costs and effects of RWD were information systems. The most frequent clinical outcome was survival. Some 47% of studies met at least 80% of CHEERS criteria. Studies were conducted with samples of 100–1000 patients or more, were randomized, and those that reported bias controls were those that fulfilled most CHEERS criteria. In conclusion, fewer than half the studies met 80% of the CHEERS checklist criteria.

Background Multiple health behaviour change (MHBC) interventions that promote healthy lifestyles may be an efficient approach in the prevention or treatment of chronic diseases in primary care. This study aims to evaluate the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of the health promotion EIRA intervention in terms of MHBC and cardiovascular reduction. Methods An economic evaluation alongside a 12-month cluster-randomised (1:1) controlled trial conducted between 2017 and 2018 in 25 primary healthcare centres from seven Spanish regions. The study took societal and healthcare provider perspectives. Patients included were between 45 and 75 years old and had any two of these three behaviours: smoking, insufficient physical activity or low adherence to Mediterranean dietary pattern. Intervention duration was 12 months and combined three action levels (individual, group and community). MHBC, defined as a change in at least two health risk behaviours, and cardiovascular risk (expressed in % points) were the outcomes used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated and used to calculate incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR). Missing data was imputed and bootstrapping with 1000 replications was used to handle uncertainty in the modelling results. Results The study included 3062 participants. Intervention costs were €295 higher than usual care costs. Five per-cent additional patients in the intervention group did a MHBC compared to usual care patients. Differences in QALYS or cardiovascular risk between-group were close to 0 (− 0.01 and 0.04 respectively). The ICER was €5598 per extra health behaviour change in one patient and €6926 per one-point reduction in cardiovascular risk from a societal perspective. The cost-utility analysis showed that the intervention increased costs and has no effect, in terms of QALYs, compared to usual care from a societal perspective. Cost-utility planes showed high uncertainty surrounding the ICUR. Sensitivity analysis showed results in line with the main analysis. Conclusion The efficiency of EIRA intervention cannot be fully established and its recommendation should be conditioned by results on medium-long term effects. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03136211. Registered 02 May 2017 – Retrospectively registered

Objective This study aimed to evaluate ustekinumab efficacy, effectiveness, and safety as a treatment for ulcerative colitis in adult patients. Methods A systematic review of the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis was carried out. The search was conducted via PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of studies and extracted study data. Results Of the 892 studies identified, 17 were included: 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), 3 long-term extensions, and 13 observational studies. In the randomized clinical trial evaluating efficacy at week 8, clinical remission was achieved in 16% of patients, whereas clinical response was achieved in 51% and 62% of patients who received intravenous ustekinumab at a dose of 130 mg and 6 mg/kg, respectively. At 3 years’ follow-up, symptomatic remission was achieved in 68% of patients. On the other hand, the effectiveness of ustekinumab was evaluated in 13 observational studies. In these studies, clinical remission at induction was achieved in 24% to 61% of cases, whereas clinical response at induction was achieved in 47% to 77% of cases. Moreover, clinical remission was achieved in 33% to 79% of cases at 52 weeks of follow-up. The adverse events ranged from 2.6% to 77% of all the studies that reported safety data. Adverse events leading to discontinuation ranged from 2.6% to 8.1%, and serious adverse events were uncommon and ranged from 3.7% to 6.0%. Conclusions Ustekinumab has demonstrated efficacy (in RCTs), effectiveness (in real clinical practice), and safety for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

No abstract