The Community Balance and Mobility Scale is a valid and reliable outcome measure for the ambulatory individual with traumatic brain injury.

Spatial and temporal gait asymmetry is common after stroke. Such asymmetric gait is inefficient, can contribute to instability and may lead to musculoskeletal injury. However, understanding of the determinants of such gait asymmetry remains incomplete. The current study is focused on revealing if there is a link between asymmetry during the control of standing balance and asymmetry during walking. This study involved review of data from 94 individuals with stroke referred to a gait and balance clinic. Participants completed three tests: (1) walking at their usual pace; (2) quiet standing; and (3) standing with maximal loading of the paretic side. A pressure sensitive mat recorded placement and timing of each footfall during walking. Standing tests were completed on two force plates to evaluate symmetry of weight bearing and contribution of each limb to balance control. Multiple regression was conducted to determine the relationships between symmetry during standing and swing time, stance time, and step length symmetry during walking. Symmetry of antero-posterior balance control and weight bearing were related to swing time and step length symmetry during walking. Weight-bearing symmetry, weight-bearing capacity, and symmetry of antero-posterior balance control were related to stance time symmetry. These associations were independent of underlying lower limb impairment. The results support the hypothesis that impaired ability of the paretic limb to control balance may contribute to gait asymmetry post-stroke. Such work suggests that rehabilitation strategies that increase the contribution of the paretic limb to standing balance control may increase symmetry of walking post-stroke.

ObjectivesNo intervention has been shown to prevent falls poststroke. We aimed to determine if perturbation-based balance training (PBT) can reduce falls in daily life among individuals with chronic stroke.DesignAssessor-blinded randomised controlled trial.SettingTwo academic hospitals in an urban area.InterventionsParticipants were allocated using stratified blocked randomisation to either ‘traditional’ balance training (control) or PBT. PBT focused on improving responses to instability, whereas traditional balance training focused on maintaining stability during functional tasks. Training sessions were 1 hour twice/week for 6 weeks. Participants were also invited to complete 2 ‘booster’ training sessions during the follow-up.ParticipantsEighty-eight participants with chronic stroke (>6 months poststroke) were recruited and randomly allocated one of the two interventions. Five participants withdrew; 42 (control) and 41 (PBT group) were included in the analysis.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was rate of falls in the 12 months post-training. Negative binomial regression was used to compare fall rates between groups. Secondary outcomes were measures of balance, mobility, balance confidence, physical activity and social integration.ResultsPBT participants reported 53 falls (1.45 falls/person-year) and control participants reported 64 falls (1.72 falls/person-year; rate ratio: 0.85(0.42 to 1.69); p=0.63). Per-protocol analysis included 32 PBT and 34 control participants who completed at least 10/12 initial training sessions and 1 booster session. Within this subset, PBT participants reported 32 falls (1.07 falls/person-year) and control participants reported 57 falls (1.75 falls/person-year; rate ratio: 0.62(0.29 to 1.30); p=0.20). PBT participants had greater improvement in reactive balance control than the control group, and these improvements were sustained 12 months post-training. There were no intervention-related serious adverse effects.ConclusionsThe results are inconclusive. PBT may help to prevent falls in daily life poststroke, but ongoing training may be required to maintain the benefits.Trial registration numberISRCTN05434601; Results.

Many important components of balance and standardized measures are regularly used by physical therapists to assess balance. Further research, however, is needed to understand the factors contributing to the relatively lower rates of assessing reactive control, the component of balance most directly responsible for avoiding a fall.

No abstract

No abstract

Feedback did not increase the amount of walking completed by individuals with stroke. However, there was a significant increase in cadence, indicating that intensity of daily walking was greater for those who received feedback than the control group. Additionally, more intense daily walking activity appeared to translate to greater improvements in walking speed.

Background-Stroke-related sensorimotor impairment potentially contributes to impaired balance. Balance measures that reveal underlying limb-specific control problems, such as a measure of the synchronization of both lower limbs to maintain standing balance, may be uniquely informative about poststroke balance control.