Gepotidacin is a first-in-class triazaacenaphthylene novel bacterial topoisomerase inhibitor (NBTI). The compound has successfully completed phase II trials for the treatment of acute bacterial skin/skin structure infections and for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea. It also displays robust in vitro activity against a range of wild-type and fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria. Due to the clinical promise of gepotidacin, a detailed understanding of its interactions with its antibacterial targets is essential. Thus, we characterized the mechanism of action of gepotidacin against Staphylococcus aureus gyrase. Gepotidacin was a potent inhibitor of gyrase-catalyzed DNA supercoiling (IC50 ≈ 0.047 μM) and relaxation of positively supercoiled substrates (IC50 ≈ 0.6 μM). Unlike fluoroquinolones, which induce primarily double-stranded DNA breaks, gepotidacin induced high levels of gyrase-mediated single-stranded breaks. No double-stranded breaks were observed even at high gepotidacin concentration, long cleavage times, or in the presence of ATP. Moreover, gepotidacin suppressed the formation of double-stranded breaks. Gepotidacin formed gyrase-DNA cleavage complexes that were stable for >4 h. In vitro competition suggests that gyrase binding by gepotidacin and fluoroquinolones are mutually exclusive. Finally, we determined crystal structures of gepotidacin with the S. aureus gyrase core fusion truncate with nicked (2.31 Å resolution) or with intact (uncleaved) DNA (2.37 Å resolution). In both cases, a single gepotidacin molecule was bound midway between the two scissile DNA bonds and in a pocket between the two GyrA subunits. A comparison of the two structures demonstrates conformational flexibility within the central linker of gepotidacin, which may contribute to the activity of the compound.

No abstract

Tuberculosis is one of the leading causes of morbidity worldwide, and the incidences of drug resistance and intolerance are prevalent. Thus, there is a desperate need for the development of new antitubercular drugs. Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrase inhibitors (MGIs) are napthyridone/aminopiperidine-based drugs that display activity against M. tuberculosis cells and tuberculosis in mouse models [Blanco, D., et al. (2015) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 1868-1875]. Genetic and mutagenesis studies suggest that gyrase, which is the target for fluoroquinolone antibacterials, is also the target for MGIs. However, little is known regarding the interaction of these drugs with the bacterial type II enzyme. Therefore, we examined the effects of two MGIs, GSK000 and GSK325, on M. tuberculosis gyrase. MGIs greatly enhanced DNA cleavage mediated by the bacterial enzyme. In contrast to fluoroquinolones (which induce primarily double-stranded breaks), MGIs induced only single-stranded DNA breaks under a variety of conditions. MGIs work by stabilizing covalent gyrase-cleaved DNA complexes and appear to suppress the ability of the enzyme to induce double-stranded breaks. The drugs displayed little activity against type II topoisomerases from several other bacterial species, suggesting that these drugs display specificity for M. tuberculosis gyrase. Furthermore, MGIs maintained activity against M. tuberuclosis gyrase enzymes that contained the three most common fluoroquinolone resistance mutations seen in the clinic and displayed no activity against human topoisomerase IIα. These findings suggest that MGIs have potential as antitubercular drugs, especially in the case of fluoroquinolone-resistant disease.

Topoisomerase II is an essential nuclear enzyme involved in regulating DNA topology to facilitate replication and cell division. Disruption of topoisomerase II function by chemotherapeutic agents is in use as an effective strategy to fight cancer. Etoposide is an anticancer therapeutic that disrupts the catalytic cycle of topoisomerase II and stabilizes enzyme-bound DNA strand breaks. Etoposide is metabolized into several species including active quinone and catechol metabolites. Our previous studies have explored some of the details of how these compounds act against topoisomerase II. In our present study, we extend those analyses by examining several effects of etoposide quinone on topoisomerase IIα including whether the quinone impacts ATP hydrolysis, DNA ligation, cleavage complex persistence, and enzyme/DNA binding. Our results demonstrate that the quinone inhibits relaxation at 100-fold lower levels of drug when compared to that of etoposide. Further, the quinone inhibits ATP hydrolysis by topoisomerase IIα. The quinone does appear to stabilize single-strand breaks similar to etoposide suggesting a traditional poisoning mechanism. However, there is minimal difference in cleavage complex persistence in the presence of etoposide or etoposide quinone. In contrast to etoposide, we find that etoposide quinone blocks enzyme/DNA binding, which provides an explanation for previous data showing the ability of the quinone to inactivate the enzyme over time. Finally, etoposide quinone is able to stabilize the N-terminal protein clamp implying an interaction between the compound and this portion of the enzyme. Taken together, the evidence supports a two-mechanism model for the effect of the quinone on topoisomerase II: (1) interfacial poison and (2) covalent poison that interacts with the N-terminal clamp and impacts the binding of DNA.

Gyrase and topoisomerase IV are the targets of fluoroquinolone antibacterials. However, the rise in antimicrobial resistance has undermined the clinical use of this important drug class. Therefore, it is critical to identify new agents that maintain activity against fluoroquinolone-resistant strains. One approach is to develop non-fluoroquinolone drugs that also target gyrase and topoisomerase IV but interact differently with the enzymes. This has led to the development of the "novel bacterial topoisomerase inhibitor" (NBTI) class of antibacterials. Despite the clinical potential of NBTIs, there is a relative paucity of data describing their mechanism of action against bacterial type II topoisomerases. Consequently, we characterized the activity of GSK126, a naphthyridone/ aminopiperidine-based NBTI, against a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial type II topoisomerases, including gyrase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and gyrase and topoisomerase IV from Bacillus anthracis and Escherichia coli. GSK126 enhanced single-stranded DNA cleavage and suppressed double-stranded cleavage mediated by these enzymes. It was also a potent inhibitor of gyrase-catalyzed DNA supercoiling and topoisomerase IV-catalyzed decatenation. Thus, GSK126 displays a similar bimodal mechanism of action across a variety of species. In contrast, GSK126 displayed a variable ability to overcome fluoroquinolone resistance mutations across these same species. Our results suggest that NBTIs elicit their antibacterial effects by two different mechanisms: inhibition of gyrase/topoisomerase IV catalytic activity or enhancement of enzyme-mediated DNA cleavage. Furthermore, the relative importance of these two mechanisms appears to differ from species to species. Therefore, we propose that the mechanistic basis for the antibacterial properties of NBTIs is bimodal in nature.