As first noted by Heinrich, 1988, glacial age
Abstract. Down water column traverses of core top weights for three planktonic species confirm Lohmann's [1995] relationship between foraminifera shell weight loss and bottom water carbonate ion content. However, they also suggest that the initial shell thickness varies with growth habitat and that the offset between bottom water and pore water carbonate ion concentration varies even on small space scales. IntroductionLohmann [1995] makes a case that the weight of whole foraminifera shells picked from a narrow size range (355-415 Ixm) provides a measure of the extent of dissolution and in so doing has the potential to serve as a paleocarbonate ion proxy. He further points out that this method is not only likely more reliable than the size index proxy [Broecker and Clark, 1999] but also that it is applicable over a wider range of water depth. We agree with Lohmann and therefore have undertaken down core studies using both approaches. In conjunction with these studies we have attempted to evaluate two important assumptions behind Lohmann's method. The first is that the initial weight of planktonic shells of a given species and diameter is independent of growth conditions, in other words, that the thickness of the shell walls is always the same. The second is that the slope of the shell weight for a given species versus pressure-corrected carbonate ion concentration in bottom water is the same for all locales. Since much of the dissolution documented by Lohmann [1995] occurs in the sediment pore waters, one might suspect the relationship to vary from one locale to another. The reason is that the ACO3 = between bottom water and pore water might differ from place to place depending on the rain rate of organic carbon. In order to shed light on these questions we have made weight measurements on three planktonic species (Globigerina sacculifer, Pulleniatina obliquiloculata, and Neogloboquadrina dutertrei) from core top samples coveting a range of water depths at three locales in the tropical ocean (the Ceara Rise in the Atlantic, the Ninetyeast Ridge in the Indian, and the Ontong Java Plateau in the Pacific, see Figure 1). Methods and ResultsWet sediment is passed through a 63-1xm sieve. The coarse fraction is then soaked for 2 hours in a sodium hexametaphosphate solution and then subjected to an 8-s duration ultrasonic treatment. The material is then dried and passed through a pair of sieves in order to isolate the 355-415 vim size fraction. Then, 50 whole shells of each of the three species are picked and weighed using a microbalance. The mean whole-shell weights established in this way are listed in Table 1 There is, however, a suggestion for P. obliquiloculata that a dogleg in dissolution rate occurs below 90 Ixmol kg -1, but as two of the three data points supporting this steepening come from eastern equatorial Pacific cores rather than from the Ontong Java locale, until we gain an understanding of Ninetyeast Ridge-Ontong Java Plateau weight difference for P obliquiloculata, we cannot be confident that the do...
[1] On the basis of measurements of the relative amounts of CaCO 3 in the less than 20-mm and the greater than 20-mm size fractions in open ocean core tops, we find that the coccoliths contribute about half the calcite present in late Holocene deep sea sediments which have experienced little or no dissolution. Although this ratio is of importance to the understanding of the ocean's CaCO 3 cycle, we can find only a few quantitative estimates of their relative contribution to currently forming marine sediments. As dissolution of foraminifera calcite takes place more rapidly than that of coccolith calcite, coccoliths dominate the CaCO 3 in sediments which have experienced sizable dissolution. Although coccoliths contribute 40-60 of the CaCO 3 in tropical sediments, higher-latitude sediments and those adjacent to continental margins often have larger proportions of coccolith CaCO 3 .Citation: Broecker, W., and E. Clark (2009), Ratio of coccolith CaCO 3 to foraminifera CaCO 3 in late Holocene deep sea sediments, Paleoceanography, 24, PA3205,
Shells of coexisting species of planktonic foraminifera from the Ontong Java Plateau reveal radiocarbon age offsets of up to 2200 years. Similar offsets are found between fragments and whole shells of single species. Steady state modelling of dissolution and bioturbation within the sedimentary mixed layer predicts age differences of up to several kiloyears due to the interplay between differential dissolution and fragmentation of foraminifer shells and bioturbation. The observation that fragile foraminiferal shells are systematically older than those of more robust species is more difficult to explain. Mechanisms of chemical erosion, interface dissolution, and sediment redistribution are all apparently unable to explain this phenomenon. A possible solution is presented in which a particular species may be represented by two distinct classes of shells which are more or less robust. In this case, differential dissolution and fragmentation causes an increase in the mean age as the fragile class contributes less to the remaining intact shells. This study highlights the vulnerability of low sedimentation rate cores to the effects of dissolution and bioturbation.
We have reconstructed the glacial-age distribution of carbonate ion concentration in the deep waters of the equatorial ocean on the basis of differences in weight between glacial and Holocene foraminifera shells picked from a series of cores spanning a range of water depth on the western Atlantic's Ceara Rise and the western Pacific's Ontong Java Plateau. The results suggest that unlike today's ocean, sizable vertical gradients in the carbonate ion concentration existed in the glacial-age deep ocean. In the equatorial Pacific, the concentration increased with depth, and in the Atlantic, it decreased with depth. In addition, the contrast between the carbonate ion concentration in deep waters produced in the northern Atlantic and deep water in the Pacific appears to have been larger than in today's ocean.
[1] Abstract: We make a case that the 20 ppm rise in atmospheric CO 2 content over the last 8000 years was at least in part a consequence of the 500 Gt C increase in terrestrial biomass early in the present interglacial rather than of a 200 Gt C decrease in terrestrial biomass during the latter part of the Holocene as proposed by Indermühle et al. [1999]. In support of this claim, we present new 13 C measurements from an Ontong Java Plateau box core, which do not reproduce the trend deduced from measurements on CO 2 from the Taylor Dome ice core. In attempt to distinguish between scenarios put forth to accounting for the late Holocene rise in atmospheric CO 2 content, we also made foraminifera shell weight measurements on three box cores from the Ontong Java Plateau. We were surprised to find that the early Holocene CaCO 3 preservation event we sought was strongly depth dependent. The largest magnitude was at 4 km where CO ¼ 3 ion concentrations appear to have been 30 mmol/kg higher than today's and hence nearly as high as those in today's North Atlantic Deep Water.
Measurements of the age difference between coexisting benthic and planktic foraminifera from western equatorial Pacific deep-sea cores suggest that during peak glacial time the radiocarbon age of water at 2-kilometers depth was no greater than that of today. These results make unlikely suggestions that a slowdown in deep-ocean ventilation was responsible for a sizable fraction of the increase of the ratio of carbon-14 (14C) to carbon in the atmosphere and surface ocean during glacial time. Comparison of 14C ages for coexisting wood and planktic foraminifera from the same site suggests that the atmosphere to surface ocean 14C to C ratio difference was not substantially different from today's.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.