We measured available and actual habitat use, morphology, escape behaviour and clinging ability in a large sample ( N = 242) of green anoles, Anolis carolinensis , in a habitat consisting primarily of segregated dense clumps of broad leaves, Aspidistra elatior (Tulane University campus, LA) to compare against similar data collected previously from a more typical habitat c. 30 km away, consisting of continuous strands of bushes and trees (Good Hope Field, St. Charles Parish, LA). At Tulane the anoles perched primarily on the broad, smooth leaves of broad leaves, whereas in Good Hope Field (GHF) they predominantly perched on branches and tree trunks. The two populations differed significantly in morphology. In Tulane, the anoles tended to have shorter distal hindlimb elements, longer forelimb elements, and were more 'slender' than those at GHF. A comparison of escape behaviour showed population and sex differences. In both populations, females had significantly longer approach distances (i.e. were more 'wary') than males. These distances were, in addition, significantly longer at GHF than at Tulane for both sexes; this may be due to the potentially higher diversity and abundance of predators at GHF, although habituation to humans may also play a role. Anoles at Tulane had significantly larger toepads and higher clinging abilities than those at GHF. The enhanced clinging abilities of anoles at Tulane may have arisen due to their propensity to use smooth leaves as their primary substrate. Overall, our data reveal substantial ecological, behavioural, morphological, and functional differences among populations, some of which may be adaptive.

A key assumption in ecomorphological studies is that morphology–function relationships are invariant due to underlying biomechanical principles. We tested the hypothesis that morphology–performance relationships are invariant across different seasons by examining how a key performance trait, bite force, and two aspects of morphology (head shape and dewlap size) changed seasonally in the field and in the laboratory in the green anole lizard Anolis carolinensis. We found that not only did bite force change seasonally (up to 80% within the same individual), but relationships between morphology and bite force are highly plastic. Of the three traits examined (bite force, head shape, and dewlap area), only head shape did not change seasonally. We noted opposing trends for how bite force and dewlap area changed seasonally; whereas dewlap areas were large in the spring, and small in the winter, bite forces were low in the spring and high in the winter. This pattern occurred because of a tradeoff at the individual level: individuals in the spring with large dewlaps and high bite forces diminish their dewlaps (but not bite force), whereas individuals with small dewlaps and low bite forces in the spring increase their bite forces (but not dewlap size). We also show that this trend was apparent both in the field (comparing different individuals) and the laboratory (comparing the same set of individuals under standardized conditions). Finally, seasonal changes were not consistent among individuals for either bite force or dewlap area, as individuals changed seasonally in proportion to their initial state. These findings cast doubt on the widely held view of invariant morphology–performance relationships, and offer a cautionary note for eco‐morphological studies.

Tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort., nom. cons.) can form a symbiosis with the fungal endophyte Epichloë coenophiala, whose presence often benefits the plant, depending on plant and fungal genetics and the prevailing environmental conditions. Despite this symbiosis having agricultural, economic, and ecological importance, relatively little is known regarding its response to predicted global climate change. We quantified the ecophysiological responses of four tall fescue genetic clone pairs, where each pair consisted of one endophyte‐infected (E+) and one endophyte‐free clone, to climate change factors of annually elevated temperature and seasonally increased precipitation. Endophyte presence increased fescue tillering and biomass production in the elevated temperature treatment and greatly enhanced the ability of two of the fescue clones to recover from the hot and unusually dry summer. Surprisingly, endophyte infection also stimulated biomass production and photosynthesis rates (for one clone) in the most mesic treatment (additional precipitation). Toxic ergot alkaloid concentrations increased in E+ individuals exposed to elevated temperatures, particularly in the fall, but the strength of the response varied across E+ genotypes. Overall, this study suggests that choice of plant and endophyte genetic material will be important in determining the productivity, toxicity, and resilience of tall fescue pastures under future climate conditions.

No abstract