Enhanced NR2A subunit expression and decreased NMDA receptor decay time at the onset of ocular dominance plasticity in the ferret. The NMDA subtype of glutamate receptor is known to exhibit marked changes in subunit composition and functional properties during neural development. The prevailing idea is that NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic responses decrease in duration after the peak of cortical plasticity in rodents. Accordingly, it is believed that shortening of the NMDA receptor-mediated current underlies the developmental reduction of ocular dominance plasticity. However, some previous evidence actually suggests that the duration of NMDA receptor currents decreases before the peak of plasticity. In the present study, we have examined the time course of NMDA receptor changes and how they correlate with the critical period of ocular dominance plasticity in the visual cortex of a highly binocular animal, the ferret. The expression of NMDA receptor subunits NR1, NR2A, and NR2B was examined in animals ranging in age from postnatal day 16 to adult using Western blotting. Functional properties of NMDA receptors in layer IV cortical neurons were studied using whole cell patch-clamp techniques in an in vitro slice preparation of ferret primary visual cortex. We observed a remarkable increase in NR1 and NR2A, but not NR2B, expression after eye opening. The NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic currents showed an abrupt decrease in decay time concurrent with the increase in NR2A subunit expression. Importantly, these changes occurred in parallel with increased ocular dominance plasticity reported in the ferret. In conclusion, molecular changes leading to decreased duration of the NMDA receptor excitatory postsynaptic current may be a requirement for the onset, rather than the end, of the critical period of ocular dominance plasticity.

Pioneering work has shown that pharmacological blockade of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor channel reduces ocular dominance plasticity. However, the results also show that doses of NMDA receptor antagonists that have an effect on ocular dominance plasticity profoundly reduce sensory responses and disrupt stimulus selectivity of cortical cells. It is, therefore, not possible to determine whether effects of NMDA receptor blockade on visual plasticity result from a specific role of NMDA receptors or from the reduction in sensory response. We have used an alternate approach to examine this question. We performed knockdown experiments using antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) complementary to mRNA coding the NR1 subunit of the NMDA receptor. After 5 days of antisense, but not sense, ODN treatment NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission was reduced markedly relative to the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor response, as indicated by whole cell patch-clamp recordings in the cortical slice preparation. This suppression of NMDA receptor-mediated currents was due to a selective reduction in the NR1 protein near the injection site relative to the untreated hemisphere in the same animal, as indicated by immunocytochemistry and Western blotting. In contrast, AMPA receptors were not affected by the antisense ODN treatment indicating specificity of effects. Another major effect of this treatment was to decrease ocular dominance plasticity. Ferrets that were monocularly deprived 1 wk during the antisense ODN treatment had ocular dominance histograms similar to those found in untreated, nondeprived animals. In contrast, ferrets treated with sense ODN and monocularly deprived had ocular dominance histograms resembling those of untreated, monocularly deprived animals. The effects on ocular dominance plasticity did not result from a disruption of sensory responses because maximum responses as well as orientation and direction selectivity of cortical cells were not affected by the treatment. In conclusion, the present results show that antisense techniques can accomplish more selective manipulations of cortical function than is possible with traditional pharmacological agents. Use of this approach also provides unambiguous evidence for a specific role of NMDA receptors in visual plasticity.