No abstract

Insect odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) are a large, diverse group of low-molecular weight proteins secreted into the fluid bathing olfactory and gustatory neuron dendrites. The best-characterized OBP, LUSH (OBP76a) enhances pheromone sensitivity enabling detection of physiological levels of the male-specific pheromone, 11-cis vaccenyl acetate. The role of the other OBPs encoded in the Drosophila genome is largely unknown. Here, using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9, we generated and characterized the loss-of-function phenotype for two genes encoding homologous OBPs, OS-E (OBP83b) and OS-F (OBP83a). Instead of activation defects, these extracellular proteins are required for normal deactivation of odorant responses to a subset of odorants. Remarkably, odorants detected by the same odorant receptor are differentially affected by the loss of the OBPs, revealing an odorant-specific role in deactivation kinetics. In stark contrast to lush mutants, the OS-E/F mutants have normal activation kinetics to the affected odorants, even at low stimulus concentrations, suggesting that these OBPs are not competing for these ligands with the odorant receptors. We also show that OS-E and OS-F are functionally redundant as either is sufficient to revert the mutant phenotype in transgenic rescue experiments. These findings expand our understanding of the roles of OBPs to include the deactivation of odorant responses. KEYWORDS olfaction; olfactory; perireceptor I NSECT odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) are abundant proteins secreted into the sensillum lymph that bathes the chemosensory neuron dendrites (Vogt et al. 1991; Leal 2013). These low-molecular weight proteins are synthesized and secreted by nonneuronal chemosensory support cells [reviewed in Ha and Smith (2009), Ronderos and Smith (2009), and Smith (2012)]. The function of this family of proteins has been a subject of speculation since their discovery as extracellular proteins that interact directly with pheromone molecules in moths (Vogt and Riddiford 1981). Postulated roles include the transport of hydrophobic pheromone molecules to the odorant receptors (

For decades, numerous researchers have documented the presence of the fruit fly or Drosophila melanogaster on alcohol-containing food sources. Although fruit flies are a common laboratory model organism of choice, there is relatively little understood about the ethological relationship between flies and ethanol. In this study, we find that when male flies inhabit ethanol-containing food substrates they become more aggressive. We identify a possible mechanism for this behavior. The odor of ethanol potentiates the activity of sensory neurons in response to an aggression-promoting pheromone. Finally, we observed that the odor of ethanol also promotes attraction to a food-related citrus odor. Understanding how flies interact with the complex natural environment they inhabit can provide valuable insight into how different natural stimuli are integrated to promote fundamental behaviors.

Alcohol-induced aggression is a destructive and widespread phenomenon, but we understand very little about the mechanisms that produce this behavior. We found that two different alcohol exposures potentiate aggression in male flies. (1) A pharmacologically relevant dose of alcohol increases aggression and decreases a goal-directed behavior in male flies. (2) In addition, the odor of alcohol itself enhances intermale aggression by potentiating olfactory signaling by cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVa), a volatile male pheromone. Characterizing these behaviors in the genetically tractable fruit fly can lead to a better understanding of the molecular correlates that regulate alcohol-induced aggression in humans and provide insights into an ethologically relevant behavior.One Sentence Summary: We identified two pathways through which alcohol stimulates intermale aggression in flies; one acts by potentiating a male olfactory pheromone while the other is mediated by the systemic effects of alcohol.

No abstract