CSII usage offers significant benefits over NPH-based MDI for individuals with Type 1 diabetes, with improvement in all significant metabolic parameters as well as in patients' quality of life. Additional studies are needed to compare CSII with glargine- and detemir-based MDI.

We concluded that mealtime injection of lispro + NPH improves the 24-h blood glucose and the percentage HbA1c as compared with Hum-R. The improvement can be maintained long term. Intensive therapy with lispro + NPH results in less frequent hypoglycemia and better awareness and counterregulation of hypoglycemia.

The aim of these studies was to compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses, as well as cognitive function during hypoglycaemia induced by s.c. injection of 0.15 IU/kg of regular human insulin (HI) and the monomeric insulin analogue [Lys(B28),Pro (B29)] (MI) in insulin-dependent-diabetic (IDDM) subjects. In these studies glucose was infused whenever needed to prevent decreases in plasma glucose below 3 mmol/l. After MI, plasma insulin increased earlier to a peak (60 vs 90 min) which was greater than after HI (294 +/- 24 vs 255 +/- 24 pmol/l), and plasma glucose decreased earlier to a 3 mmol/l plateau (60 vs 120 min) (p < 0.05). The amount of glucose infused to prevent plasma glucose falling below 3 mmol/l was approximately three times greater after MI than HI (293 +/- 26 vs 90 +/- 25 mumol.kg-1 x 60-375 min-1, p < 0.05). After MI, hepatic glucose production was more suppressed (0.7 +/- 1 vs 5.9 +/- 0.54 mumol.kg-1.min-1) and glucose utilization was less suppressed than after HI (11.6 +/- 0.65 vs 9.1 +/- 0.11 mumol.kg-1.min-1) (p < 0.05). Similarly, plasma NEFA, glycerol, and beta-OH-butyrate were more suppressed after MI than HI (p < 0.05), whereas plasma lactate increased only after MI, but not after HI. Responses of counterregulatory hormones, symptoms and deterioration in cognitive function during plasma glucose plateau of 3 mmol/l were superimposable after MI and HI (p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pregnancy offers a window of opportunity to program the future health of both mothers and offspring. During gestation, women experience a series of physical and metabolic modifications and adaptations, which aim to protect the fetus development and are closely related to both pre-gestational nutritional status and gestational weight gain. Moreover, pre-gestational obesity represents a challenge of treatment, and nowadays there are new evidence as regard its management, especially the adequate weight gain. Recent evidence has highlighted the determinant role of nutritional status and maternal diet on both pregnancy outcomes and long-term risk of chronic diseases, through a transgenerational flow, conceptualized by the Development Origin of Health and Diseases (Dohad) theory. In this review we will analyse the physiological and endocrine adaptation in pregnancy, and the metabolic complications, thus the focal points for nutritional and therapeutic strategies that we must early implement, virtually before conception, to safeguard the health of both mother and progeny. We will summarize the current nutritional recommendations and the use of nutraceuticals in pregnancy, with a focus on the management of pregnancy complicated by obesity and hyperglycemia, assessing the most recent evidence about the effects of ante-natal nutrition on the long-term, on either maternal health or metabolic risk of the offspring.

OBJECTIVEInsulin pump therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) and multiple daily injections (MDIs) with insulin glargine as basal insulin and mealtime insulin lispro have not been prospectively compared in people naïve to either regimen in a multicenter study. We aimed to help close that deficiency.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSPeople with type 1 diabetes on NPH-based insulin therapy were randomized to CSII or glargine-based MDI (both otherwise using lispro) and followed for 24 weeks in an equivalence design. Fifty people were correctly randomized, and 43 completed the study.RESULTSTotal insulin requirement (mean ± SD) at end point was 36.2 ± 11.5 units/day on CSII and 42.6 ± 15.5 units/day on MDI. Mean A1C fell similarly in the two groups (CSII −0.7 ± 0.7%; MDI −0.6 ± 0.8%) with a baseline-adjusted difference of −0.1% (95% CI −0.5 to 0.3). Similarly, fasting blood glucose and other preprandial, postprandial, and nighttime self-monitored plasma glucose levels did not differ between the regimens, nor did measures of plasma glucose variability. On CSII, 1,152 hypoglycemia events were recorded by 23 of 28 participants (82%) and 1,022 in the MDI group by 27 of 29 patients (93%) (all hypoglycemia differences were nonsignificant). Treatment satisfaction score increased more with CSII; however, the change in score was similar for the groups. Costs were ∼3.9 times higher for CSII.CONCLUSIONSIn unselected people with type 1 diabetes naïve to CSII or insulin glargine, glycemic control is no better with the more expensive CSII therapy compared with glargine-based MDI therapy.

No abstract

In 114 subjects with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus the nocturnal insulin requirements to maintain euglycaemia were assessed by means of i.v. insulin infusion by a Harvard pump. The insulin requirements decreased after midnight to a nadir of 0.102 +/- 0.03 mU.kg-1.min-1 at 02.40 hours. Thereafter, the insulin requirements increased to a peak of 0.135 +/- 0.06 mU.kg-1.min-1 at 06.40 hours (p less than 0.05). The dawn phenomenon (increase in insulin requirements by more than 20% after 02.40 hours lasting for at least 90 min) was present in 101 out of the 114 diabetic subjects, and its magnitude (% increase in insulin requirements between 05.00-07.00 hours vs that between 01.00-03.00 hours) was 19.4 +/- 0.54% and correlated inversely with the duration of diabetes (r = -0.72, p less than 0.001), but not with age. The nocturnal insulin requirements and the dawn phenomenon were highly reproducible on three separate nights. In addition, glycaemic control, state of counterregulation to hypoglycaemia and insulin sensitivity all influenced the magnitude of the dawn phenomenon as follows. In a subgroup of 84 subjects with Type 1 diabetes, the multiple correlation analysis showed that not only duration of diabetes (t = -9.76, p less than 0.0001), but also % HbA1 significantly influenced the magnitude of the dawn phenomenon (t = 2.03, p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The simpler glargine regimen decreases the percentage of HbA(1c) and frequency of hypoglycaemia and improves responses to hypoglycaemia more than NPH. Thus, glargine appears more suitable than NPH as basal insulin for intensive treatment of T1 DM.