The objective of this study was to develop a rapid, reproducible, and robust method for detecting Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis in poultry samples. First, for the extraction and purification of DNA from the preenrichment culture, four methods (boiling, alkaline lysis, Nucleospin, and Dynabeads DNA Direct System I) were compared. The most effective method was then combined with a real-time PCR method based on the double-stranded DNA binding dye SYBR Green I used with the ABI Prism 7700 system. The specificity of the reaction was determined by the melting temperature (T m ) of the amplicon obtained. The experiments were conducted both on samples of chicken experimentally contaminated with serotype Enteritidis and on commercially available poultry samples, which were also used for comparisons with the standard cultural method (i.e., ISO 6579/2001). The results of comparisons among the four DNA extraction methods showed significant differences except for the results from the boiling and Nucleospin methods (the two methods that produced the lowest threshold cycles). Boiling was selected as the preferred extraction method because it is the simplest and most rapid. This method was then combined with SYBR Green I real-time PCR, using primers SEFA-1 and SEFA-2. The specificity of the reaction was confirmed by the T m , which was consistently specific for the amplicon obtained; the mean peak T m obtained with curves specific for serotype Enteritidis was 82.56 ؎ 0.22°C. The standard curve constructed using the mean threshold cycle and various concentrations of serotype Enteritidis (ranging from 10 3 to 10 8 CFU/ml) showed good linearity (R 2 ؍ 0.9767) and a sensitivity limit of less than 10 3 CFU/ml. The results of this study demonstrate that the SYBR Green I real-time PCR constitutes an effective and easy-to-perform method for detecting serotype Enteritidis in poultry samples.
Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), the most toxic substance known, is produced by the spore-forming bacterium Clostridium botulinum and, in rare cases, also by some strains of Clostridium butyricum and Clostridium baratii. The standard procedure for definitive detection of BoNT-producing clostridia is a culture method combined with neurotoxin detection using a standard mouse bioassay (SMB). The SMB is highly sensitive and specific, but it is expensive and time-consuming and there are ethical concerns due to use of laboratory animals. PCR provides a rapid alternative for initial screening for BoNT-producing clostridia. In this study, a previously described multiplex PCR assay was modified to detect all type A, B, E, and F neurotoxin genes in isolated strains and in clinical, food, environmental samples. This assay includes an internal amplification control. The effectiveness of the multiplex PCR method for detecting clostridia possessing type A, B, E, and F neurotoxin genes was evaluated by direct comparison with the SMB. This method showed 100% inclusivity and 100% exclusivity when 182 BoNT-producing clostridia and 21 other bacterial strains were used. The relative accuracy of the multiplex PCR and SMB was evaluated using 532 clinical, food, and environmental samples and was estimated to be 99.2%. The multiplex PCR was also used to investigate 110 freshly collected food and environmental samples, and 4 of the 110 samples (3.6%) were positive for BoNT-encoding genes.
The RNA programmed non-specific (trans) nuclease activity of CRISPR-Cas Type V and VI systems has opened a new era in the field of nucleic acid-based detection. Here, we report on the enhancement of trans-cleavage activity of Cas12a enzymes using hairpin DNA sequences as FRET-based reporters. We discover faster rate of trans-cleavage activity of Cas12a due to its improved affinity (Km) for hairpin DNA structures, and provide mechanistic insights of our findings through Molecular Dynamics simulations. Using hairpin DNA probes we significantly enhance FRET-based signal transduction compared to the widely used linear single stranded DNA reporters. Our signal transduction enables faster detection of clinically relevant double stranded DNA targets with improved sensitivity and specificity either in the presence or in the absence of an upstream pre-amplification step.
Salmonella has represented the most common and primary cause of food poisoning in many countries for at least over 100 years. Its detection is still primarily based on traditional microbiological culture methods which are labor-intensive, extremely time consuming, and not suitable for testing a large number of samples. Accordingly, great efforts to develop rapid, sensitive and specific methods, easy to use, and suitable for multi-sample analysis, have been made and continue. Biosensor-based technology has all the potentialities to meet these requirements. In this paper, we review the features of the electrochemical immunosensors, genosensors, aptasensors and phagosensors developed in the last five years for Salmonella detection, focusing on the critical aspects of their application in food analysis.
An electrochemical enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) coupled with flow injection analysis (ELISA-FIA) and a PCR-based method using ST11 and ST15 primers for detecting salmonellae in meat were evaluated in comparison with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) culture method. The methods were applied to experimentally contaminated and naturally contaminated meat samples. The results showed that both ELISA-FIA and PCR allowed detection of salmonella in a product contaminated with a low number of the microorganisms (1 to 10 salmonellae/25 g) after only 5 h of incubation of preenrichment broth, and they were just as effective as the ISO method.The incidence of foodborne infection by Salmonella continues to be an important problem in the United States (16) and in the European Community (4, 16).Raw and undercooked meat, eggs, milk, and especially poultry are the most commonly implicated vehicles of Salmonella spp. infection (10,15,16,20,24). For foods to be considered "salmonella free," European legislation requires that from 1 to 25 g be tested, depending on the type of food. The standard culture method (ISO 6579/2002) for detection of salmonella in food is rather sensitive and quite inexpensive, but it requires 4 to 5 days to generate results.Given that efforts to prevent salmonellosis must be applied at all phases of the food production chain, based on the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) system (23), the methods for detecting salmonella need to be more rapid than the ISO method. To this end, new technologies have been used to develop rapid methods. Specifically, a number of antibodyantigen-based methods have been developed to detect Salmonella spp. or specific serotypes in a variety of food (3,8,13,18,21,25). Other authors developed immunoelectrochemical assays or piezoelectric flow injection analysis (FIA) biosensors to detect Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium (2, 7, 26). However, although these biosensors have the potential to provide direct label-free detection of bacteria, these piezoelectric FIA systems have a low level of sensitivity, and neither has been applied to food samples.Methods based on PCR for the detection of salmonella in food have also been developed (12,17,19).All of the above methods require that a preenrichment step be performed (5,9,14,18,22).The objective of the present study was to evaluate two rapid techniques for detection of salmonella: an electrochemical enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) coupled with FIA (ELISA-FIA) (6) and a PCR method using ST11 and ST15 primers (1).The experiments were first performed with experimentally contaminated samples to reduce and optimize the preenrichment times; the two methods were then applied to naturally contaminated meat samples, and the results were compared to those obtained with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) method. MATERIALS AND METHODSThe experiments were performed on the following: (i) experimentally contaminated meat samples, to establish the minimum preenrichment...
Botulinum toxins (BoNTs) are classically produced by Clostridium botulinum but rarely also from neurotoxigenic strains of Clostridium baratii and Clostridium butyricum. BoNT type A (BoNT/A), BoNT/B, BoNT/E, and very rarely BoNT/F are mainly responsible for human botulism. Standard microbiological methods take into consideration only the detection of C. botulinum. The presumptive identification of the toxigenic strains together with the typing of BoNT has to be performed by mouse bioassay. The development of PCR-based methods for the detection and typing of BoNT-producing clostridia would be an ideal alternative to the mouse bioassay. The objective of this study was to develop a rapid and robust real-time PCR method for detecting C. botulinum type A. Four different techniques for the extraction and purification of DNA from cultured samples were initially compared. Of the techniques used, Chelex 100, DNeasy tissue kit, InstaGene matrix DNA, and boiling, the boiling technique was significantly less efficient than the other three. These did not give statistically different results, and Chelex 100 was chosen because it was less expensive than the others. In order to eliminate any false-negative results, an internal amplification control was synthesized and included in the amplification mixture according to ISO 22174. The specificity of the method was tested against 75 strains of C. botulinum type A, 4 strains of C. botulinum type Ab, and 101 nontarget strains. The detection limit of the reaction was less than 6 ؋ 10 1 copies of C. botulinum type A DNA. The robustness of the method was confirmed using naturally contaminated stool specimens to evaluate the tolerance of inhibitor substances. SYBR green real-time PCR showed very high specificity for the detection of C. botulinum types A and Ab (inclusivity and exclusivity, 100%).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.