The LIN28A and LIN28B oncogenes are overexpressed in about 15% of human cancers, and they selectively block the expression of the tumor suppressor miRNA let-7 family, comprising twelve members (let-7a-1, -2, -3, let-7b, let-7c, let-7d, let-7e, let-7f-1, -2, let-7g, let-7i and miR-98) expressed from eight distinct loci. Upon binding to pre-let-7, LIN28A recruits ZCCHC11, a 3′ terminal uridylyl transferase, responsible for let-7 poly-uridylation and subsequent targeting of poly-uridylated let-7 miRNA for degradation.
Expression of several let-7 miRNA family members was measured using quantitative RT-PCR in LIN28-positive or -negative tumor cell lines. In agreement with the inverse relationship between LIN28A/B and let-7 expression already observed by others (1), the lowest expression of let-7 miRNA was observed in LIN28A (e.g., IGROV-1 and T-47D) or LIN28B (e.g., NCI-H838, Hep-G2 and NCI-H1299) positive cell lines, and the degree of let-7 miRNA repression in LIN28A or LIN28B positive cell lines was particularly prominent for miR-98, let-7i and let-7b family members.
Although the proliferation of LIN28B-positive tumor cell lines was sensitive to the 3 LIN28B siRNAs tested, the expression of LIN28A was not required for the proliferation and survival of LIN28A-expressing tumor cell lines, as demonstrated with one LIN28A siRNA that displayed an efficient knock-down at low concentrations with minimal impact on the proliferation of the T-47D tumor cell line. This LIN28A siRNA was further demonstrated to significantly upregulate the expression of several let-7 miRNAs such as miR-98 or let-7i, supporting an on-target modulation of the pathway.
We also tested several siRNAs against ZCCHC11 uridylyl transferase, and found that the growth of either LIN28A- or LIN28B-positive tumor cell lines was inhibited by ZCCHC11 knockdown. However, ZCCHC11 protein knock-down was not able to restore let-7 miRNA expression, as it was seen for the LIN28A knock-down. These findings suggest that the role of ZCCHC11 in tumor cell lines might be more complex than just targeting poly-uridylated let-7 miRNA for degradation.
Overall, our results seems to indicate that in LIN28A-positive tumor cell lines, LIN28A knock-down impacts let-7 miRNA expression, but has not a significant antiproliferative effect, whereas ZCCHC11 knock-down inhibits cell proliferation and this effect seems to be disconnected from let-7 miRNAs modulation. This lack of apparent effect on the expression of the miRNA let-7 expression might be related to the dual role of uridylyl transferases recently described for group II let-7 miRNAs, the mono- and poly-uridylation that leads to let-7 biogenesis and let-7 degradation respectively (2).
1- Viswanathan SR, Powers JT, Einhorn W, et al. Nat Genet 2009; 41: 843-848.
2- Heo I, Ha M, Lim J et al. Cell 2012; 151: 521-532.
Citation Format: Laurent VIDARD, Claire MARIET, Eric BOITIER, Véronique SIERRA, Elisabeth CAVROIS, Carlos GARCIA-ECHEVERRIA, Hélène GOULAOUIC. Inhibition of either LIN28A or ZCCHC11 (TUT4) provides distinct effects on the expression of the let-7 miRNA family and tumor cell proliferation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3550. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3550
