Writing this article will discuss the role of the notary honorary council in examining cases of abuse of notary office. In this article, we will discuss what a notary is, what are his authorities and powers as a notary in accordance with his profession. This problem is motivated by the many cases of notary errors in carrying out their profession. For example, the number of dual land deeds that should be the role of a notary in making the deed. As a notary cohort, it is necessary to investigate several existing cases, especially those concerning notaries. In this investigation, it will be divided into several parts. Which parts will later become the authority of the notary honorary assembly. This is also related to the code of ethics as a notary. In carrying out a position, of course someone is required or required to apply in accordance with the existing code of ethics. If someone who holds a position then commits a violation or acts outside the code of ethics, it can be classified as a criminal act of violating the code of ethics. One of the codes of ethics that is highly respected in the notary profession is to behave honestly, independently and not take sides with anyone. This is then upheld in the notary profession. This study uses normative legal methods. The normative method is legal research consisting of research on legal principles, legal systematics, and legal comparisons. The sources for writing this article are from journals and articles or other reading materials as research sources. These sources are then analyzed and presented in written form to produce a scientific work that is expected to be well understood. In addition, this article is expected to be an input or source of reading for other law students
Narcotics users can be classified in various ways, including as narcotics addicts or victims of narcotics addiction. Naltrexone users and abusers are defined as those who use or abuse narcotics to the point of becoming physically and psychologically dependent on the drugs they use. In accordance with Article 54 of the Narcotics Law, the following things occur: It is specifically stated that "narcotics addicts and victims of narcotics abuse are required to undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation" and this refers to the provisions of SEMA No. 4 of 2010. Based on the Decision of the District Court of Semarang Number 407/Pid.SUS/2016/PN.Smg, the author gives examples of narcotics abusers who were ordered to undergo rehabilitation for 6 (six) months. The research method that the author uses is a normative juridical method, namely by conducting secondary data sources, namely data that are directly related to the problem being studied, and which consists of a number of data obtained from library books, laws and regulations, and others. related to the implementation of drug abuse rehabilitation programs. Following up on the research findings, the authors came to the conclusion that the legal considerations are that drug abusers must undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation in addition to imprisonment. In order to reintegrate into society, one's character and morals must be examined. For drug addicts, social rehabilitation is the process of reintroducing them to society, so they don't repeat their actions. Social rehabilitation also aims to reintegrate addicts and/or drug abusers into society by restoring thought processes, emotions, and behavios that are indicators of change. They have normal personality traits and are able to interact with others in their social environment (in a rehabilitation environment).
Disparitas putusan hakim dianggap sebagai isu yang mengganggu dalam system peradilan pidana terpadu dan prakterk disparitas taku hanya ditermukan di Indonesia. Disparitas hukum juga sering dihubungkan dengan independensi hakim. Model pemidanaan diatur dalam peundang-undangan berupa perumusan sanksi pidana maksimal juga ikut memberi andil dalam praktek ini. Disparitas putusan hakim terhadap perkara yang sama terhadap tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak masih kerap terjadi pada putusan pengadilan khususnya tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perlindungan dalam perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia pada anak terhadap disparitas putusan tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.