Communication breakdowns are key barriers in access to transplantation and effective education of patients and treating teams are critical to optimal patient care. 1,2 Despite this, limited work has been done to identify optimal education and communication strategies. 3 In 2019, we pursued a quality improvement initiative to improve communication and education between Canadian transplant programs and community specialists, primary care physicians (PCPs) and patients. A short survey was administered electronically to representatives of all adult and pediatric transplant programs (kidney: 27, heart: 16, lung: 7, liver: 10) in Canada from April to May 2019. Then the COVID-19 pandemic presented an unprecedented urgency to adopt virtual approaches. We utilized this serendipitous opportunity to examine how the previously identified strategies evolved during the pandemic. Following approval from the Research Ethics Board of the McGill University Health Centre, we administered the same survey from July to October 2021 with two additional questions.The response rates for the first and second survey were 98.3% and 86.7%, respectively. If participants were unavailable or declined to take part, an alternative person was contacted. A descriptive analysis of the survey responses data was conducted, and we used chi-square to compare proportions that chose videoconference as a strategy pre-pandemic and during the pandemic.Over half of the participants (53.9%) agreed/strongly agreed that better communication strategies were developed during the pandemic while 19.2% disagreed/strongly disagreed and 26.9% were neutral. The proportion of programs that used videoconference with community specialists doubled (prepandemic: 13.6% vs pandemic: 26.9% P = .08), and there was a significant increase in its use when communicating with PCPs (prepandemic: 1.7% vs pandemic: 13.5%, P = .02) and patients (prepandemic: 1.7% vs pandemic: 48.1%, P < .001). Despite this, traditional methods, such as clinic notes and phone calls, continued to be the top choices (Figure 1A-C).Only a third of the participants (32.7%) agreed/strongly agreed that better education strategies were developed during
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.