There has been a significant increase in the number of interactive methods proposed for solving multiple objective mathematical programming (MOMP) problems. As long as the number of different procedures increases, the need for comparative analysis and justification becomes more intense. We present in this paper an alternative approach for drawing conclusions from an experimental study that compares different MOMP procedures. According to our evaluation scheme, the procedures are considered as units that require effort (computational and participial) to guide the DM towards a final solutian. In such a scheme, the procedures are evaluated in terms of relative efficiency via data envelopment analysis (DEA).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.