Background and Purpose: We aimed to investigate the rate of hospital admissions for cerebrovascular events and of revascularization treatments for acute ischemic stroke in Italy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Methods: The Italian Stroke Organization performed a multicenter study involving 93 Italian Stroke Units. We collected information on hospital admissions for cerebrovascular events from March 1 to March 31, 2020 (study period), and from March 1 to March 31, 2019 (control period). Results: Ischemic strokes decreased from 2399 in 2019 to 1810 in 2020, with a corresponding hospitalization rate ratio (RR) of 0.75 ([95% CI, 0.71–0.80] P <0.001); intracerebral hemorrhages decreased from 400 to 322 (hospitalization RR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.69–0.93]; P =0.004), and transient ischemic attacks decreased from 322 to 196 (hospitalization RR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.51–0.73]; P <0.001). Hospitalizations decreased in Northern, Central, and Southern Italy. Intravenous thrombolyses decreased from 531 (22.1%) in 2019 to 345 in 2020 (19.1%; RR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75–0.99]; P =0.032), while primary endovascular procedures increased in Northern Italy (RR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.13–2.32]; P =0.008). We found no correlation ( P =0.517) between the hospitalization RRs for all strokes or transient ischemic attack and COVID-19 incidence in the different areas. Conclusions: Hospitalizations for stroke or transient ischemic attacks across Italy were reduced during the worst period of the COVID-19 outbreak. Intravenous thrombolytic treatments also decreased, while endovascular treatments remained unchanged and even increased in the area of maximum expression of the outbreak. Limited hospitalization of the less severe patients and delays in hospital admission, due to overcharge of the emergency system by COVID-19 patients, may explain these data.

Carotid atherosclerosis has a relevant impact on cerebral blood flow regulation. There is accruing evidence that hemodynamic impairment related to the presence of a significant carotid lumen narrowing may predispose to the development of cerebral dysfunctions, including a reduction in cognitive abilities. In the last years an increasing number of findings showed that carotid stenosis did contribute to cognitive impairment not only in relation to the occurrence of cerebral ischemic lesions, but also as an independent risk factor. The principal mechanisms involved are chronic hypoperfusion, microembolization and cerebrovascular reactivity impairment. Moreover, more recent studies showed alterations of regional functional connectivity. In this narrative review, we analyzed the relationships between carotid stenosis, cerebral hemodynamic derangement and cognitive impairment onset and progression, and underlined that cognitive impairment is the final result of the complex interaction between different elements, including also collateral circulation, cerebral hemodynamic status, brain connectivity and pro-inflammatory state. Further, therapeutic approaches, with a specific focus on vascular risk factors correction and on the effectiveness of surgical or endovascular interventions were discussed. We particularly focused our attention on the concept of "asymptomatic carotid stenosis", and how could a cognitive impairment improve after an intervention, and how this could change the indications to surgical approach. Larger studies and randomized controlled trials are urgently required to better define time, characteristics and effectiveness of both medical and surgical/ endovascular approaches.

No abstract

Introduction Intravenous thrombolysis (IT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) have significantly changed the clinical outcome of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Concerns about possible complications often reduce the use of these treatment options for older patients, preferentially managed with antiplatelet therapy (AT). Aim of this study was to evaluate, in a population of middle-old (75–84 years) and oldest-old (≥ 85 years) subjects, the efficacy and safety of different treatments for AIS (IT, IT + MT, MT or AT), mortality and incidence of serious complications. Patients and methods All patients aged over 75 years admitted for AIS in two Stroke Units were enrolled. The physician in each case considered all treatment options and chose the best approach. NIHSS and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were obtained and differences between admission and discharge scores, defined as delta(NIHSS) and delta(mRS), were calculated. The relationship between delta(NIHSS), delta(mRS) and type of procedure was analysed with a GLM/Multivariate model. Differences in mortality and incidence of serious complications were analysed with the chi-square test. Results A total of 273 patients, mean age 84.07 (± 5.47) years, were included. The Delta(NIHSS) was significantly lower in patients treated with AT than in those treated with IT and MT (p < 0.009 and p < 0.005, respectively). Haemorrhagic infarction occurrence was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) among patients treated with AT (10.6%) or IT (16.7%) compared to MT (34.9%) or MT + IT (37.0%). No significant difference was observed for in-hospital mortality. Age did not influence the outcome. Conclusions Our results suggest that IT and AT are effective and relatively safe approaches in middle-aged and older patients.

No abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) proved that short-term (21–90 days) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces the risk of early ischemic recurrences after a noncardioembolic minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) without substantially increasing the hemorrhagic risk. We aimed at understanding whether and how real-world use of DAPT differs from RCTs. METHODS: READAPT (Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or TIA) is a prospective cohort study including >18-year-old patients treated with DAPT after a noncardioembolic minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA from 51 Italian centers. The study comprises a 90-day follow-up from symptom onset. In the present work, we reported descriptive statistics of baseline data of patients recruited up to July 31, 2022, and proportions of patients who would have been excluded from RCTs. We compared categorical data through the χ² test. RESULTS: We evaluated 1070 patients, who had 72 (interquartile range, 62–79) years median age, were mostly Caucasian (1045; 97.7%), and were men (711; 66.4%). Among the 726 (67.9%) patients with ischemic stroke, 226 (31.1%) did not meet the RCT inclusion criteria because of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >3 and 50 (6.9%) because of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >5. Among the 344 (32.1%) patients with TIA, 69 (19.7%) did not meet the RCT criteria because of age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of TIA, presence of diabetes score <4 and 252 (74.7%) because of age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of TIA, presence of diabetes score <6 and no symptomatic arterial stenosis. Additionally, 144 (13.5%) patients would have been excluded because of revascularization procedures. Three hundred forty-five patients (32.2%) did not follow the RCT procedures because of late (>24 hours) DAPT initiation; 776 (72.5%) and 676 (63.2%) patients did not take loading doses of aspirin and clopidogrel, respectively. Overall, 84 (7.8%) patients met the RCT inclusion/exclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The real-world use of DAPT is broader than RCTs. Most patients did not meet the RCT criteria because of the severity of ischemic stroke, lower risk of TIA, late DAPT start, or lack of antiplatelet loading dose. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.

No abstract

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative disorder associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular diseases. In this narrative review, we aimed to analyze the relationships between acute ischemic stroke and PV. We conducted a PubMed/Medline and Web of Sciences Database search using MeSH major terms. We found 75 articles and finally considered 12 case reports and 11 cohort studies. The ischemic stroke resulted as the first manifestation of PV in up to 16.2% of cases; the cumulative rate of cerebrovascular events was up to 5.5 per 100 persons per year and stroke accounted for 8.8% of all PV-related deaths; age, mutations, and a previous history of thrombosis were the main risk factors. The best approach to reduce stroke recurrence risk is unclear, even if some evidence suggests a potential role of lowering hematocrit below 45%. Ischemic stroke represents one of the most common PV manifestations but, despite their relationship, patients with both diseases have a very heterogeneous clinical course and management. PV-related strokes often remain underdiagnosed, especially for the low prevalence of PV. An early diagnosis could lead to prompt treatment with phlebotomy, cytoreduction, and low-dose aspirin to decrease the risk of recurrences. Clinicians should be aware of PV as a risk factor for stroke when approaching the differential diagnosis of cryptogenic strokes. An early diagnosis could positively influence patients’ management and clinical outcomes. Further studies are required to evaluate the role of PV treatments in the prevention of cerebrovascular disease.