INTRODUCTION: Bone metabolism assessment includes total alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and more specifically the bone-alkaline phosphatase (BAP) as markers of bone formation. Its measurement is important for diagnosis and in bone pathology treatment following-up. In our setting, a ten-fold price for BAP has raised the necesity to review in how many cases its request has been justified. AIM: Establish through an appropiate statistical analysis, cut-off values of ALP that could guarantee to perform BAP measurements. Its analysis would allow us to make a demand adequacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out on laboratory analysis orders of 405 adult women. We separate them into the following groups: (G1): 48 premenopausal womens (pre) and 357 post menopausal women (pos): (G2)133 <60 years-old, (G3)135: 60-69 years-old and (G4)89: >70 years-old. All patients had measurements of both analytes; ALP (colorimetric method, Roche Cobas, Reference value (RefV)=40-130 UI/L) and BAP (QLIA, Liaison Diasorin, RefV pre=3-19 ug/mL, pos=6-26 ug/mL). Statistic analysis: ROC-Plot to define cut-off value (we define as true positive BAP values over RefV). Kruskal Wallis, Dunn test to compare all the groups. RESULTS: (median and range): ALP(UI/L) G1: 81(38-265) G2: 88(47-211)*, G3: 85(39-213) y G4: 80(40-138) (*p<0.05 G2vsG4). BAP (ug/L) G1: 13.6(5.1-106), G2: 14.3(3.5-61.5)*, G3: 13.9(2.9-52.5) and G4: 11.6(2.0-29.6), (*p<0.05 G2vsG4). We observe that 73% of G1, 93.5% of G2, 92.6% of G3, 97.7% of G4 has showed normal values. The ROC plot analysis showed the best cut-off for ALP in G1=87 (S=92%,Sp=85%,AUC=0.955). If, using this cut off we had processed 18 BAP which 6 patients would have been normal (33.4%). In G2=127 (S=100%, Sp=97.6%, AUC=0.996) using this cut off we had processed 13 BAP, which 4 patients would have been normal (30.8%). Meanwhile in G3=102(S=100%, Sp=85.6%, AUC=0.97) we had processed 30 BAP and G4=120 (S=100%, Sp=96.5%, AUC=0.966) we had processed only 6 BAP. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the calculated cut-off allowed us to investigate 97% of the pathological BAPs. The measurement of ALP first, would guarantee to process only 17% of the requested BAPs. This suggestion would result in a significant saving of our resources, maintaining the quality of care. It is necessary to apply cut-off according to age to justify the BAP assesment. Physicians must define the appropriate exceptions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.