Background: There have been many studies documenting adverse psychiatric consequences for people who have experienced childhood and adult sexual and physical abuse. These include posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, substance abuse, eating disorders and probably some personality disorders or trait abnormalities. Much less is known about the links between abuse and physical/psychosomatic conditions in adult life. Hints of causal links are evident in the literature discussing headache, lower back pain, pelvic pain and irritable bowel syndrome. These studies are not definitive as they use clinic-based samples. Methods: This study used interview data with a random community sample of New Zealand women, half of whom reported childhood sexual abuse and half who did not. Details about childhood physical abuse and adult abuse were also collected in a two-phase study. Results: Complex relationships were found, as abuses tended to co-occur. Seven of 18 potentially relevant medical conditions emerged as significantly increased in women with one or more types of abuse. These were chronic fatigue, bladder problems, headache including migraine, asthma, diabetes and heart problems. Several of these associations with abuse are previously unreported. Conclusions: In this random community sample, a number of chronic physical conditions were found more often in women who reported different types of sexual and physical abuse, both in childhood and in adult life. The causal relationships cannot be studied in a cross-sectional retrospective design, but immature coping strategies and increased rates of dissociation appeared important only in chronic fatigue and headache, suggesting that these are not part of the causal pathway between abuse experiences and the other later physical health problems. This finding and the low co-occurrence of the identified physical conditions suggest relative specificity rather than a general vulnerability to psychosomatic conditions in women who have suffered abuses. Each condition may require separate further study.

No abstract

No abstract

ObjectivesHead injury is a common reason for emergency department (ED) attendance. Around 1% of patients have life-threatening injuries, while 80% of patients are discharged. National guidelines (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)) were introduced in Scotland with the aim of achieving early identification of those with acute intracranial lesions yet safely reducing hospital admissions.This study aims to assess the impact of these guidelines and any effect the national 4-hour ED performance target had on hospital admissions for head injury.SettingAll Scottish hospitals between April 1998 and March 2016.ParticipantsPatients admitted to hospital for head injury or traumatic brain injury (TBI) diagnosed by CT imaging identified using administrative Scottish Information Services Division data. There are 275 hospitals in Scotland. In 2015/2016, there were 571 221 emergency hospital admissions in Scotland.InterventionsThe SIGN head injury guidelines introduced in 2000 and 2009. The 4-hour ED target introduced in 2004.OutcomesThe monthly rate of hospital admissions for head injury and traumatic brain injury.Study designAn interrupted time series analysis.ResultsThe first guideline was associated with a reduction in monthly admissions of 0.14 (95% CI 0.09 to 4.83) per 100 000 population. The 4-hour target was associated with a monthly increase in admissions of 0.13 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.20) per 100 000 population. The second guideline reduced monthly admissions by 0.09 (95% CI−0.13 to −0.05) per 100 000 population. These effects varied between age groups.The guidelines were associated with increased admissions for patients with injuries identified by CT imaging—guideline 1: 0.06 (95% CI 0.004 to 0.12); guideline 2: 0.05 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.06) per 100 000 population.ConclusionIncreased CT imaging of head injured patients recommended by SIGN guidelines reduced hospital admissions. The 4-hour ED target and the increased identification of TBI by CT imaging acted to undermine this effect.

No abstract

A commendable amount of research into family violence has been conducted in several disciplines over the past 20 years. Consequently, our understanding of this complex problem has been advanced significantly. This is reflected in a steady stream of journal articles and books, indicating that the topic is now well established as a valid area for investigation. Prior to that, many reports assumed family violence to be a rare, unfortunate occurrence, falling outside the usual practice arenas of medicine, nursing, the law and health/social policy.In 1965, only two typologies of interpersonal violence were listed by Index Medicus subject headings: rape, and a newly introduced heading for child abuse. Since then, more detailed categories have been introduced (spouse abuse in 1977, elder abuse in 1984 and child sexual abuse in 1987). (See table 1.) During this time, the research focus has developed from establishing the extent of various forms of violence (with groundbreaking work by Kempe, Straus and Gelles, Finkelhor, Russell and others (Kempe et al., 1971; Finkelhor, 1979;Straus et al., 1980;Russell, 1983), through placing violence in its social and psychological context, to attempts to inform clinical practice by describing situations of escape and recovery from violence.Several over-arching themes have emerged across the spectrum of violence research, and these can be seen as unifying threads in a selection of books