No abstract

No abstract

One of the key arguments put forward for the benefits of kinship placements is that they are likely to provide permanency for children. However, little is known about the factors which promote placement stability or the reasons for placement disruption. Eleanor Lutman, Joan Hunt and Suzette Waterhouse examine placement stability and disruption for a cohort of children placed in kinship care through care proceedings (Hunt et al, 2008). When compared with disruption rates for other forms of care, it appears that for younger children kinship care can be a positive option but the figures are less positive for older children. However, after disruption over half of the kinship-placed children remained within their family networks and many kinship carers retained a positive relationship with the child. The findings indicate placements of older children, placements with aunts/uncles and placements where the carer and child are less familiar with each other are more likely to disrupt and thus may need more support.

Since practitioners have little research to inform them about how to keep neglected children safe and improve their outcomes, we conducted a study about how risks are managed over time. The research in seven local authorities involved 138 neglected children who were returned from care to their parents and followed up for another five years through reviews of case files and interviews with social workers.Work with neglected children and their families was dogged by 'inescapable errors', which we argue will always occur in work over time and need to be deliberately interrupted. Parents were difficult to engage, and over time abuse and neglect were often minimised so that referrals about harm to children did not lead to sufficient protective action. Parents were given too many chances to change, and files lacked information on the development of children on which decisions about intervention could be based. Using written contracts with parents would assist practitioners to assess parental capacity to make the changes required. A new approach to working with neglected children is required which will allow patterns of children's developmental and other progress to be recognised over time, rooted in collecting evidence which could be used in care proceedings if required.