An evolutionary perspective on human infant sleep physiology suggests that parent-infant cosleeping, practiced under safe conditions, might be beneficial to both mothers and infants. However, cosleeping is not part of mainstream parenting ideology in the United States or the United Kingdom, and little evidence is available to indicate whether, and under what circumstances, parents sleep with their newborn infants. We present data from an anthropological investigation into the practices and attitudes of new and experienced parents of newborn infants regarding parent-infant sleeping arrangements in a community in the northeast of England. Despite not having contemplated cosleeping prior to the birth, new parents in our sample found it to be a convenient nighttime caregiving strategy, and one which was practiced regularly. Infants slept with both their parents, some being habitual all-night cosleepers, but commonly beginning the night in a cnb and sleeping with their parents for several hours following the early morning feed, [infant sleep, newborn, cosleeping, new parents\

This paper reports findings from a study that investigated infant care practices in a small population of Northeast England in order to determine whether parent-infant bedsharing is common parenting behavior. In a year-long prospective study we examined the opinions and practices of parents with regard to their infants' nighttime sleeping strategies before and after the birth of their babies. Results confirm that parents pursue a heterogeneous array of nighttime parenting strategies and that 65 percent of the sample had actually bedshared. Parents with no previous intention to do so slept with their babies for a variety of reasons. One of this study's most important findings is that babies were being brought into bed with both parents. Ninety five percent of the bedsharing infants slept with both mother and father. This study has shown that bedsharing is a relatively common parenting practice. Despite initial worries and fears, mainly concerning overlaying, some parents found bedsharing an effective option yet were covert in their practices, fearing the disapproval of health professionals and relatives.

Dyadic co-sleeping (mother -baby) is a common strategy for night-time infant care in the majority of world cultures. Triadic co-sleeping (mother -father -baby) is less common, although still widely practised cross-culturally. This paper examines triadic co-sleeping in an opportunistic sample of parents from the North Tees region of England, and explores fathers' expectations and experiences of sleeping with their babies. Using a prospective study design, 36 sets of parents, pre-and post-natally, were interviewed about infant care strategies, particularly at night. Although they did not anticipate sleeping with their infants at the pre-natal interview, the majority of fathers (81%) had done so by the time of the second interview. First-time fathers were afraid that they would squash or suffocate the baby in their sleep, and some were concerned that the infant's presence would adversely affect their own sleep. Fathers used a variety of strategies to help overcome their initial fears of co-sleeping. Among those for whom triadic co-sleeping became a regular night-time infant care strategy, the pleasures of prolonged intimate contact with their infant were clearly apparent. It is suggested that the experience of sleeping with their infant ameliorates some of the distancing effects felt by fathers outside the breast-feeding relationship, and helps encourage paternal involvement in nighttime infant care-giving. aim of this paper was to explore parents' attitudes towards sleeping arrangements for their infants, and to document night-time parenting behaviour in a post-industrial region of the north-east of England (Ball et al., 1999). Here, fathers' attitudes and practices

No abstract

No abstract