Over the years chemotherapy failure has been a vital research topic as researchers have been striving to discover reasons behind it. The extensive studies carried out on chemotherapeutic agents confirm that resistance to chemotherapy is a major reason for treatment failure. “Resistance to chemotherapy,” however, is a comprehensive phrase that refers to a variety of different mechanisms in which ATP-binding cassette (ABC) mediated efflux dominates. The ABC is one of the largest gene superfamily of transporters among both eukaryotes and prokaryotes; it represents a variety of genes that code for proteins, which perform countless functions, including drug efflux – a natural process that protects cells from foreign chemicals. Up to date, chemotherapy failure due to ABC drug efflux is an active research topic that continuously provides further evidence on multiple drug resistance (MDR), aiding scientists in tackling and overcoming this issue. This review focuses on drug resistance by ABC efflux transporters in human, viral, parasitic, fungal and bacterial cells and highlights the importance of the MDR permeability glycoprotein being the mutual ABC transporter among all studied organisms. Current developments and future directions to overcome this problem are also discussed.
Exosomes released from cancer cells support metastasis and growth of recipient cells and increase their resistance to chemotherapy. Therapeutic targeting of exosomes is a promising area in cancer research. Our aim is to test the effect of the mast cell stabilizer ketotifen on exosomes release from cancer cells and how this can modify their response to doxorubicin. Exosomes release from three cancer cell lines (MCF7, HeLa and BT549) was assessed by scan electron microscope and exosomes quantification kit. Doxorubicin export within exosomes was monitored flurometrically and cellular sensitivity to doxorubicin ± ketotifen was measured by sulphorhodamine-B and colony formation assays. The three cell lines release different amounts of exosomes with the highest quantity released from BT549 followed by MCF7 and then HeLa. Ketotifen (10 µmol L) reduced exosomes release in all three cell lines with different efficiency (HeLa>MCF7>BT549). Doxorubicin export via exosomes was highest in BT549, lower in HeLa and lowest in MCF7 cells. Pretreatment with ketotifen sensitized the cells to doxorubicin (HeLa>MCF7>BT549) with a sensitization factor of 27, 8 and 1.25 respectively. Increased sensitivity of cells to doxorubicin by ketotifen was proportional to its effect on exosomes release. Our data is the first report of ketotifen modulating exosomes release from cancer cells and opens the avenue for exosomes-targeting cancer therapy. The differential effects of ketotifen on doxorubicin exosomal export in the cell lines studied, suggests an opportunity of pharmacological enhancement of doxorubicin anti-tumor activity in some but not all cancer types.
Abbreviations: 5AZA, 5-aza-2 0 -deoxycytidine; BSA, bovine serum albumin; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; DNMT, DNA methyltransferase; HAT, histone acetyl transferase; HDAC, histone deacetylase; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; SCLC, small-cell lung cancer; TSA, trichostatin A; 5mc, 5-methyl cytosine.Lung cancer cells show inherent and acquired resistance to chemotherapy. The lack of good predictive markers/ novel targets and the incomplete understanding of the mechanisms of resistance limit the success of lung cancer response to chemotherapy. In the present study, we used an isogenic pair of lung adenocarcinoma cell lines; A549 (wild-type) and A549DOX11 (doxorubicin resistant) to study the role of epigenetics and miRNA in resistance/response of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells to doxorubicin. Our results demonstrate differential expression of epigenetic markers whereby the level of HDACs 1, 2, 3 and4, DNA methyltransferase, acetylated H2B and acetylated H3 were lower in A549DOX11 compared to A549 cells. Fourteen miRNAs were dys-regulated in A549DOX11 cells compared to A549 cells, of these 14 miRNAs, 4 (has-mir-1973, 494, 4286 and 29b-3p) have shown 2.99 -4.44 fold increase in their expression. This was associated with reduced apoptosis and higher resistance of A549DOX11cells to doxorubicin and etoposide. Sequential treatment with the epigenetic modifiers trichostatin A or 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine followed by doxorubicin resulted in: (i) enhanced sensitivity of both cell lines to doxorubicin especially at low concentrations, (ii) enhanced doxorubicin-induced DNA damage in both cell lines, (iii) dysregulation of some miRNAs in A549 cells. In conclusion, A549DOX11 cells resistant to DNA damaging drugs have epigenetic profile and miRNA expression different from the sensitive cells. Moreover, epigenetic modifiers may reverse the resistance of certain NSCLC cells to DNA damaging agents by enhancing induction of DNA damage. This may open the door for using epigenetic profile/miRNA expression of some cancer cells as resistance markers/targets to improve response of resistant cells to doxorubicin and for the use of combination doxorubicin/epigenetic modifiers to reduce doxorubicin toxicity.
Kinases and phosphatases are important players in growth signaling and are involved in cancer development. For development of targeted cancer therapy, attention is given to kinases rather than phosphatases inhibitors. Src homology region 2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase2 (SHP2) is overexpressed in different types of cancers. We investigated the SHP2-inhibitory effects of two new 5-aminosalicylate-4-thiazolinones in human cervical (HeLa) and breast (MCF-7 & MDA-MB-231) cancer cells. In-silico molecular docking showed preferential affinity of the two compounds towards the catalytic over the allosteric site of SHP2. An enzymatic assay confirmed the docking results whereby 0.01 μM of both compounds reduced SHP2 activity to 50%. On cellular level, the two compounds significantly reduced the expression of SHP2, KRAS, p-ERK and p-STAT3 in HeLa but not in the other two cell lines. Phosphorylation of AKT and JNK was enhanced in HeLa and MCF7. Both compounds exhibited anti-proliferative/anti-migratory effects on HeLa and MCF7 but not in MDA-MB-231 cells. These results indicate that inhibition of SHP2 and its downstream pathways by the two compounds might be a promising strategy for cancer therapy in some but not all cancer types.
Inhibition of the repair of 5-fluorouracil (FU)-induced DNA lesions may improve the response of many tumors to this anticancer agent. Despite the identified associations between DNA strand breaks and the lethality of thymidylate synthase inhibitors, the role of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways in a cellular response to 5-FU treatment has not been studied yet. Isogenic cell lines defective (irs1SF), wild type (AA8), or reconstituted (1SFK8) in the DSB repair protein XRCC3 were used to investigate the effect of defective DSB repair on the overall sensitivity of cells to 5-FU and to see how targeting DSB repair may affect other cellular responses to 5-FU. Treatment with 5-FU resulted in (i) similar induction of DSB in both cell lines as indicated by the formation of gamma-H2AX (a marker for DSB). The repair of these breaks was complete in AA8 but not in irs1SF cells. (ii) Concentration-dependent reduction in the survival of both cell lines. The AA8 cells were six times more sensitive to 5-FU than the irs1SF cells. (iii) An earlier and more prolonged G(1)/S phase arrest in AA8 compared with the irs1SF cells. (iv) Induction of apoptosis as indicated by sub-G(1) cells and caspase-3 activity in AA8 but not in irs1SF cells. XRCC3 complementation of irs1SF cells restored the wild-type phenotype. This result shows that targeting DSB repair is not always associated with increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents such as 5-FU because it may affect other cellular responses such as cell cycle regulation and induction of apoptosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.