For patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) requiring treatment, survival advantages have been shown with the addition of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to conventional chemotherapy regimens versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment. 1 Rituximab was the first anti-CD20 agent approved for FL treatment, and obinutuzumab is a type II anti-CD20 mAb with a distinct mode of action versus rituximab. [2][3][4] In the phase III GALLIUM trial, obinutuzumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated improved progression-free survival versus rituximab plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, advanced FL. [5][6][7] Obinutuzumab is currently administered by intravenous (IV) infusion over 3-4 hours. Previous studies found rituximab was well tolerated as a shorter 90-minute infusion by patients who did not experience grade ≥3 infusion-related reactions (IRRs) after the first standard-rate infusion. 8 A 90-minute short duration infusion (SDI) of obinutuzumab may offer the potential to reduce time and resources required to administer treatment, providing time and cost savings for both patients and healthcare settings.GAZELLE (NCT03817853) was an international, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase IV study investigating the safety and efficacy of a 90-minute SDI of obinutuzumab as induction (with chemotherapy) and maintenance (as monotherapy) in patients with previously untreated, advanced FL. Here, we report the primary results from GAZELLE, focusing on the induction phase of treatment.All enrolled patients had histologically documented CD20+ FL (grade 1-3a), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and advanced disease (stage III or IV, or stage II with bulky disease). During the induction phase, IV obinutuzumab (1000 mg) was administered on days (D) 1, 8, and 15 of cycle (C) 1, and on D1 thereafter, plus chemotherapy selected by the investigator for 6-8 cycles (bendamustine; cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone [CHOP]; or cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone [CVP]; Suppl. Methods). Obinutuzumab was administered at the standard infusion rate in C1. Patients without a grade ≥3 IRR in C1 received obinutuzumab as a 90-minute SDI (or <110 min) from C2 onwards (including in the maintenance phase). IRRs were defined as any events that occurred during or within 24 hours from the end of study treatment infusion and were judged by an investigator as related to the infusion of study treatment components. Patients with grade ≥3 IRR in C1 received obinutuzumab at the standard infusion rate in C2, and obinutuzumab SDI from C3 onwards if no grade ≥3 IRRs occurred in C2. Patients with a second grade ≥3 IRR or a grade 4 IRR (regardless of infusion rate) discontinued obinutuzumab.The primary end point was the incidence of grade ≥3 IRRs during C2 (severity determined according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0). Secondary safety end points included the incidence, nature, and severity of all-causality adverse events (...
7545 Background: Obinutuzumab (G)-chemotherapy (chemo) has demonstrated improved progression-free survival compared with rituximab (R)-chemo in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). G is currently administered by IV infusion over ̃3–4 hours. A shorter duration of infusion in Cycle (C) 2 and subsequent cycles, as is standard practice with R, could improve convenience for patients (pts) and efficiency for infusion facilities. We report the primary analysis of the prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, Phase IV, GAZELLE study (NCT03817853), which evaluated the safety of G administered as a 90-minute (min) SDI from C2 onwards in pts with FL. Methods: Pts with previously untreated FL received G (1000mg) intravenously on Day (D) 1, 8, and 15 of C1, and on D1 thereafter, plus chemo (bendamustine, CHOP, or CVP) for 6–8 cycles. In C1, pts received G at the standard infusion rate. Pts without a Grade (Gr) ≥3 infusion-related reaction (IRR) in C1 were eligible to receive G as a 90-min SDI from C2. Pts with a Gr 3 IRR in C1 received the standard G infusion in C2, and were eligible for G SDI in subsequent cycles if no Gr ≥3 IRRs occurred. Pts with a second Gr 3/4 IRR discontinued G. At the end of induction (EOI), responding pts received maintenance G (1000mg) as SDI for 2 years or until disease progression (PD). The primary endpoint was incidence of Gr ≥3 IRRs during C2. IRRs were defined as any event occurring ≤24 hours from infusion judged to be related to treatment. Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and investigator-assessed overall response rate at EOI. Results: As of December 3, 2020, 113 pts had received study treatment. Median age was 62.0 years, 50.4% were male, 61.9% had stage IV FL, and 45.1% were classified as high-risk FLIPI. Of the 110 pts who were eligible for G SDI from C2, no pt experienced a Gr ≥3 IRR with SDI in C2 (Table). One pt experienced a Gr 3 IRR with SDI in C5, presenting hypertension. All other IRRs with SDI were Gr 1/2. No Gr 4/5 IRRs were reported. Other AEs were similar to those observed in previous studies. At the clinical cut-off date, 104 pts had a CT imaging-based response assessment at EOI and 9 pts had no response assessment; 76/113 (67.3%) had a complete response, 22 (19.5%) had a partial response, and six (5.8%) had PD. Conclusions: In GAZELLE, G SDI in C2 and beyond appeared to be safe. No Gr 3 IRRs were observed in C2 and only one Gr 3 IRR was reported in subsequent cycles. The safety profile of G SDI was comparable with the established profile of G in advanced FL. Clinical trial information: NCT03817853. [Table: see text]
Background: Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who are on initial treatment, report low levels of symptoms and a higher quality of life index in contrast to patients who have relapsed (Pettengell et al. Ann Oncol 2008). In the immunochemotherapy era, effective and safe treatments should create minimal treatment-related symptoms, regardless of the underlying patient characteristics. In the GALLIUM study (NCT01332968), patients treated with obinutuzumab (G)-chemotherapy followed by G maintenance reported low levels of symptoms (Davies et al. Ann Hematol 2020). Short duration infusions (SDI) of treatments for patients with untreated, advanced FL may yield substantial time savings for patients, and free up healthcare resources. The GAZELLE study (NCT03817853) is a prospective open label, multicenter, single arm, Phase IV study, which evaluated the safety of G administered as a 90-minute (min) SDI infusion from Cycle 2 (C2) onwards in patients with previously untreated advanced FL. G SDI appears to be safe, with no Grade 3 infusion-related reactions (IRRs) reported in C2, and only one Grade 3 IRR reported in subsequent cycles (Canales et al. ASCO 2021). In this analysis, we report symptom levels and provider preference during G SDI administration. Methods: During the first cycle, patients received the first three infusions of G (1000mg) administered at the standard infusion rate on Days 1, 8, and 15. Patients who did not experience any Grade ≥3 IRRs during the first cycle received G as a SDI from C2 onwards. The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI: range 0 [not present) to 10 [worst]) was used to assess the severity of disease/treatment-related symptoms, and how symptoms interfere with aspects of the patient's daily living. It was completed on Day 1 of C1-6, at the end of induction, during maintenance, at the end of maintenance, and at the end of the study. Additional MDASI analyses were conducted based on patient risk groups (bulky disease, Ann Arbor staging, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, B-symptoms, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index). At any time point after C4 Day 1, study investigators (physicians and nurses) completed an evaluation composed of questions addressing their site's experience with regards to time saved, convenience and infusion preference after administration of SDI and standard infusion of G, across all patients enrolled in the study. Results: 110/113 patients received at least one SDI of G, as per protocol. Median age was 62 years, (range: 28-86 years) and 62% of patients had stage IV FL, 51% presented with B-symptoms at baseline, 45% with bulky disease and 45% were classified as high-risk FLIPI. Median baseline MDASI severity and interference scores were 0 or 1 for most symptoms. Interference scores did not meaningfully change over the course of treatment. Median MDASI scores (baseline or change over treatment), also did not differ by risk subgroups. Over 60% of providers reported that SDI of G would save at least 2 hours in infusion time per visit, with >65% saying it was much more convenient versus regular infusion. SDI was preferred by >95% of providers for reasons attributed to time savings and patient comfort. Conclusions: Untreated, advanced FL patients had no or mild symptom severity and interference at baseline regardless of risk group. These low levels were maintained during G SDI administration. Additionally, SDI administration was preferred by providers for the time it saved, convenience, and comfort for patients, suggesting that G SDI administration can be a beneficial treatment option for untreated, advanced FL patients by minimizing patient treatment burden with no impact on health-related quality of life. Disclosures Trask: Genentech: Current Employment; Genentech/Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bortolini: Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Rai: Janssen Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Ono Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau. Salar: Abbvie: Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; EusaPharma: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Hospital del Mar: Current Employment. Canales: Eusa Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; iQone: Honoraria; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy; Sandoz: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Klingbiel: F.Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Parreira: Hoffmann la Roche: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria. Deraet: Hoffmann La Roche: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Vorozheikina: IQVIA: Current Employment. Hübel: Celgene: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; EUSA: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Buchholz: Scripps Health Care System: Current Employment; Roche (Navify software): Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nucleix LLC: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ultimate Opinions in Medicine LLC: Honoraria; Empyrean medical systems: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mirada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells represent a novel immunotherapy that has shown remarkable success in the treatment of adult relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, adult R/R mantle cell lymphoma, and R/R acute paediatric lymphoblastic leukaemia. One barrier to the widespread use of CAR T-cell therapy is toxicity, primarily cytokine release syndrome (CRS) with a variable grade of severity. The main manifestations of CRS are fever, hypotension, cytopenia, organ dysfunction among others. Neurological toxicities vary widely and range from headaches to encephalopathy. In addition, anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy provokes an array of less frequent events, such as coagulopathies, delayed cytopenia, and cardiovascular toxicities. In general, toxicities are usually reversible and resolve on their own in most cases, though severe cases may require intensive care and immunosuppressive therapy. Deaths due to CRS, neurologic toxicity and infectious complications have been reported, which highlights the gravity of these syndromes and the critical nature of appropriate intervention. In this paper, we look at all available FDA- and EMA-approved information about the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, risk factor reviews of existing toxicity grading systems, current management strategies, and guidelines for anti-CD19 CAR T-cell toxicities. We also present new approaches, which are under investigation, to mitigate these adverse events.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.