Aim: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of combined extracorporeal therapy in patients with severe sepsis after cardiac surgery. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients received combined extracorporeal therapy (LPS-adsorption with Toraymyxin columns + CPFA). The inclusion criteria were clinical signs of severe sepsis, EAA = 0.6, and PCT >2 ng/ml. 20 comparable patients in the control group received only standard therapy. Results: Each patient in the study group received 2 daily treatments of combined extracorporeal therapy. In contrast to controls, we noted an increase in the values of MAP from 73 to 82 mm Hg, (p < 0.001) and the mean oxygenation index (from 180 to 246, p < 0.001), decrease of EAA from 0.77 to 0.55, p < 0.001, and PCT (from 6.23 to 2.83 ng/ml, p < 0.001). The 28-day survival rate was 65 and 35% in the study and control groups respectively, p = 0.11. Conclusion: The combined use of LPS-adsorption and CPFA in a single circuit with standard therapy is a safe and possibly effective adjunctive method for treating severe sepsis.
Introduction: Sepsis still represents an obstacle in modern medicine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combined use of lipopolysaccharide adsorption and haemodialysis (HD) with high cut-off haemofilters as part of the complex intensive care of patients with severe sepsis after cardiac surgery. Methods: The study group included 26 patients, 57 (48-62) years of age, with severe sepsis. The inclusion criteria were clinical signs of severe sepsis (systemic inflammatory response syndrome + infection site + failure of two or more organs) together with endotoxin activity assay (EAA) ≥0.6 and procalcitonin (PCT) levels ≥2 ng/ml. Antimicrobial therapy was initiated in the first hour after the diagnosis of severe sepsis and extracorporeal therapy was initiated within 24 h. All of the patients in the study group received standard therapy. Additionally, they received treatment consisting of two LPS adsorption procedures and HD procedures with high cut-off haemofilters in a single circuit. For the control group, 30 comparable patients, 57 (51-61) years of age, were selected and received only standard therapy. Results: After the last HD procedure within the extracorporeal therapy, we noted an increase in the mean arterial pressure from 76 to 90 mm Hg, p < 0.01, and oxygenation index (from 226 to 291, p < 0.02), in addition to decreases in the LPS concentration according to EAA (from 0.73 to 0.59, p < 0.01) and the Limulus amebocyte lysate test (from 1.44 to 0.36 IU/ml, p < 0.01); PCT falls from 8.19 to 2.44 ng/ml, p < 0.01, and sepsis-related organ failure assessment scores decreases from 13 to 10, p = 0.007. When we compared the data between the study group the day after the procedures and the control group 3 days after the start of intensive care, we discovered that there were statistically significant differences in mean arterial pressure (90 vs. 81 mm Hg, p = 0.0004), oxygenation index (291 vs. 229, p = 0.01), and EAA levels (0.59 vs. 0.67, p = 0.05). Differences in the PCT were not significant (2.44 vs. 3.41, p = 0.15). The 28-day survival rate in the study group was higher than that in the control group (65.4 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.03). Conclusion: The combined use of LPS adsorption and HD with high cut-off haemofilters in conjunction with standard therapy is a safe, effective method for treating patients who have severe sepsis.
Sepsis remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care units. The extracorporeal therapy in the complex treatment of sepsis seems to be the most promising direction. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of selective endotoxin adsorption on the basis of the analysis of our own experience with the intensive therapy for sepsis in adult cardiac surgical patients. Our single-center study included 143 patients with sepsis. One hundred and three adult patients received lipopolysaccharide adsorption procedures using Toraymyxin-PMX-20R columns. The historical control group included 30 adult patients received only conservative therapy, and 10 children (6.2-14 kg) received hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin-PMX-0.5R. After the lipopolysaccharide-adsorption course, we noted improving of the hemodynamic and respiratory parameters. A favorable effect of hemoperfusion was a decrease procalcitonin and endotoxin activity assay, expressed by changes of leukocytosis, a normalization of body temperature. The 28-day survival was 53% in the study group and 30% in the control group (P = 0.037). The 28-day survival of children who received selective hemoperfusion was 90%. Our own experience with the use of selective hemoperfusion in a fairly large group of cardiovascular patients with sepsis showed the safety and efficacy of these procedures.
<b><i>Background:</i></b> To date, sepsis remains one of the main challenges of intensive care in pediatrics. Newborns with low birth weight and infants with chronic diseases and congenital disorders are particularly at risk. The incidence of infectious complications in pediatric cardiac surgery is known to be approximately 15–30%. The main etiological factor of sepsis is endotoxin. <b><i>Aim:</i></b> To evaluate the efficiency and safety of polymyxin (PMX) B-immobilized column-direct hemoperfusion in complex intensive therapy of sepsis in children after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Prospective cohort study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This study enrolled 15 children, aged 9–96 months, with congenital heart diseases and with body weights of 6.2–22.5 kg. The criteria for admission were body weight >6 kg and clinical and laboratory signs of sepsis (microbiological analysis, procalcitonin [PCT] >2 ng/mL, and endotoxin activity assay [ЕАА] >0.6). Intensive care included inotropic and vasopressor support, mechanical ventilation, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, and PMX hemoperfusion procedures. Extracorporeal therapy was initiated within 24 h following the sepsis diagnosis. Every patient underwent 2 hemoperfusion sessions with the use of a PMX B-immobilized column; the session duration was 180 min. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We noted improvements in hemodynamic parameters, oxygenation index, and laboratory signs of sepsis, with decreases in the endotoxin concentration according to the EAA, PCT, and presepsin levels. The 28-day survival of the patients in this severely affected group was 80%. <b><i>Main Conclusion:</i></b> The inclusion of extracorporeal methods of blood purification, aimed at the selective elimination of circulating endotoxin, in the treatment of sepsis increases the survival rates of children after open heart surgery. <b><i>Second Conclusion:</i></b> The obtained results of sepsis therapy with PMX hemoperfusion in children after cardiac surgery enable us to suggest the sufficient safety and efficiency of the procedures in this category of severely affected patients.
Background. To analyse the clinical informativity of the neutrophil oxidative response level (“Response”) during an Endotoxin Activity Assay (EAA) as a new biomarker defining the indications and effectiveness of intensive care in cardiac surgical patients with septic complications. Methods. Blood samples were taken from 198 adult patients who were admitted to the ICU after cardiac surgery (SIRS: 34, MODS: 36, and sepsis: 128). The composite of laboratory studies included CRP, PCT, EAA with “Response” level, and presepsin. Results. 83% of patients had a “normal” neutrophil response, 12% of patients had a low neutrophil response, and 5% of patients had a critically low neutrophil response. Patients with critically low responses had the lowest values of the EAA and the highest concentrations of PSP and D-dimer (p < 0.05). Conclusions. EAA results should be interpreted with the level of neutrophil response. “Response” > 0.5 has a negative predictive value; the EAA < 0.6 at “Response” < 0.5 may indicate a high level of endotoxaemia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.