Background: Existing studies have established an association between pregnancy, birth complications, and mental health in the first few weeks postpartum. However, there is no clear understanding of whether pregnancy and birth complications increase the risk of adverse maternal mental outcomes in the longer term. Research on maternal adverse mental health outcomes following pregnancy and birth complications beyond 12 months postpartum is scarce, and findings are inconsistent. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis will examine the available evidence on the association between pregnancy and birth complications and long-term adverse maternal mental health outcomes. Methods and analysis: We will include cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies in which a diagnosis of pregnancy and/or birth complication (preeclampsia, pregnancy loss, caesarean section, preterm birth, perineal laceration, neonatal intensive care unit admission, major obstetric haemorrhage, and birth injury/trauma) was reported and maternal mental disorders (depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorders, psychosis, and schizophrenia) after 12 months postpartum were the outcomes. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science will be conducted following a detailed search strategy until August 2022. Three authors will independently review titles and abstracts of all eligible studies, extract data using pre-defined standardised data extraction and assess the quality of each study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We will use random-effects meta-analysis for each exposure and outcome variable to calculate overall pooled estimates using the generic inverse variance method. This systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Ethical consideration: The proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is based on published data; ethics approval is not required. The results will be presented at scientific meetings and publish in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022359017
Background: Existing studies have established an association between pregnancy, birth complications, and mental health in the first few weeks postpartum. However, there is no clear understanding of whether pregnancy and birth complications increase the risk of adverse maternal mental outcomes in the longer term. Research on maternal adverse mental health outcomes following pregnancy and birth complications beyond 12 months postpartum is scarce, and findings are inconsistent. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis will examine the available evidence on the association between pregnancy and birth complications and long-term adverse maternal mental health outcomes. Methods and analysis: We will include cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies in which a diagnosis of pregnancy and/or birth complication (preeclampsia, pregnancy loss, caesarean section, preterm birth, perineal laceration, neonatal intensive care unit admission, major obstetric haemorrhage, and birth injury/trauma) was reported and maternal mental disorders (depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorders, psychosis, and schizophrenia) after 12 months postpartum were the outcomes. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science will be conducted following a detailed search strategy until August 2022. Three authors will independently review titles and abstracts of all eligible studies, extract data using pre-defined standardised data extraction and assess the quality of each study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We will use random-effects meta-analysis for each exposure and outcome variable to calculate overall pooled estimates using the generic inverse variance method. This systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Ethical consideration: The proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is based on published data; ethics approval is not required. The results will be presented at scientific meetings and publish in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022359017
Background Progressive resistance training (PRT) has the potential to reduce age-related disability and has been proven to benefit the older adult in a variety of ways. PRT is prescribed routinely by physiotherapists for frail older adults in an inpatient setting. To date little is known of their experiences engaging in PRT. This study aimed to explore older adult inpatients’ perceptions and experience of PRT as part of their overall physiotherapy program in a Specialised Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit. Methods The study had a qualitative design. Semi-structured interviews explored experiences and perceptions of PRT along with motivators and barriers to participation. Interviews were face to face and conducted in the unit. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. 11 frail older inpatients with orthogeriatric (n = 5), neurological (n = 2), general surgical (n = 2) and general medical (n = 2) diagnoses were interviewed. Results The study identified three overarching themes: Acceptability, Facilitators and Barriers. In the category of Acceptability participants identified the subthemes: (1) PRT is challenging, (2) PRT is Rewarding and (3) PRT is Enjoyable. In the category of Facilitators, the following subthemes emerged: (4) Positive outcomes as motivators and (5) Supervision is necessary for engagement. In the category of Barriers, (6) Low self-efficacy beliefs and (7) the Negative effects of PRT, such as pain and fatigue affected participation. Conclusion Frail older inpatients find PRT to be an acceptable form of exercise. It is perceived to be challenging, but rewarding and enjoyable for most. Participants were motivated to participate in PRT by the positive outcomes (improved strength, general health, function, independence, confidence) they experienced. They felt supervision from professionals with medical expertise was essential to participation; and had low self-efficacy beliefs surrounding independent practice; fearing falling and causing harm. Pain and fatigue also impacted participation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.