Background When staffing legislation was introduced, New Jersey nurse leaders recognized from the research and their years of clinical leadership experience that the work environment is a multidimensional concept and that staffing is not the only variable related to nurse and patient outcomes. Thus, an understanding of what nurses need in their hospital environment to practice nursing effectively was sought. Aims The aim of this study was to examine the evidence regarding clinical nurses’ perception of what they need to practice nursing effectively in the acute care hospital environment. Methods The following population, intervention, comparison, outcome question was used to search the literature databases PubMed, CINAHL, Johanna Briggs, and the Sigma Theta Tau Henderson Library: In the hospital environment what do nurses perceive as needed to practice nursing effectively? Specific search criteria and the Johns Hopkins nursing guidelines and tools were used to identify relative studies. Results The final review, which addressed what nurses in the hospital environment need to practice nursing effectively, included 25 articles: 20 were an evidence level III, and five were evidence level II. From this review, five key concepts were identified: Leadership, autonomy/decision making, respect/teamwork, resources/staffing, and organizational commitment to nursing. Linking Evidence to Action This integrative review, which explored nurses’ perceptions of what is needed to provide effective quality care, identified that providing quality care is multifactorial in nature. Resources, including but not limited to staffing, and leadership were identified as important by nurses as a key factor in supporting quality care. Nurses must be provided with resources and infrastructure to do their jobs, in an environment supported by authentic transformational leadership.

Aim:To identify workplace factors that influence patient advocacy among registered nurses (RNs) and their willingness to report unsafe practices.Background: A prior study by Black illustrated that 34% of respondents were aware of conditions that may have caused patient harm but had not reported the issue. The most common reasons identified for failing to report issues were fear of retaliation and a belief that nothing would prevail from the reports. Method:Using Black's study as a model, reporting data were collected from a sample of RNs actively practicing in acute care hospitals.Results: While reasons for reporting are consistent with Black's study, data suggest that a nurse's experiences and working environment are prime factors in their willingness to report patient care issues. Conclusion:Although RNs may not have personally experienced workplace retaliation, fear of retaliation when reporting unsafe patient care practices still exists.Nursing leadership's ability to facilitate a culture of safety by proactively addressing unsafe practices fosters a level of comfort for patient advocacy and willingness to report issues. Education, professional associations and existing protection laws are available resources which contribute to organizational support systems. Implications for Nursing Management:The findings of this study are consistent with the literature in that organizations need to create a supportive workplace environment whereby, through collective input and leadership, reporting protocols are in place that empower RNs to report unsafe conditions. Direct care nurses are positioned, especially well to identify and speak up regarding conditions that may result in near misses or actual adverse events. Therefore, it is the responsibility, and duty, of nursing management to create and facilitate reporting systems that will be utilized without fear of retaliation and that will contribute to a culture of safety and patient advocacy. K E Y W O R D S patient advocacy, registered nurses, workplace factors | 1177 COLE Et aL.

No abstract