BACKGROUND:ATP - binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) plays essential roles in the biogenesis of high -density lipoprotein - cholesterol. Variations in the ABCA1 gene may influence the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD).AIM:Present study aimed to investigate the association of rs2230806 (R219K) polymorphism of ABCA1 gene with the development and severity of CAD in an Iranian population.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Our study population consisted of 100 patients with angiographically confirmed CAD and 100 controls. The genotyping of R219K mutation of ABCA1 gene was determined by PCR - RFLP method. Lipid profile was determined using routine colourimetric assays. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS - 16.RESULTS:The genotypic (P = 0.024) and allelic (P = 0.001) distribution of the ABCA1 R219K polymorphism were significantly different between the two groups. In a univariate analysis (with genotype RR as the reference), the RK genotype (OR = 0.46, 95%CI = 0.25-0.86, P = 0.020) and KK genotype (OR = 0.27, 95%CI = 0.11 – 0.66, P = 0.005) was significantly associated with a decreased risk of CAD. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that smoking (0.008), diabetes (P = 0.023), triglyceride (P = 0.001), HDL - cholesterol (P = 0.002) and ABCA1 KK genotype (P = 0.009) were significantly and independently associated with the risk of CAD. The association between different genotypes of R219K polymorphism with lipid profile was not significant in both groups (P > 0.05). The R219K polymorphism was significantly associated with severity of CAD (P < 0.05).CONCLUSION:The carriage of K allele of ABCA1 R219K polymorphism has a protective effect on CAD risk and correlates with a decreased severity of CAD. This protective effect seems to be mediated independently of plasma lipid levels.
BackgroundMany studies suggested mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplantation as a new approach to control hyperglycemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus through differentiation mechanism. In contrary others believed that therapeutic properties of MSCs is depends on paracrine mechanisms even if they were not engrafted. This study aimed to compare these two approaches in control of hyperglycemia in STZ-induced diabetic rats.MethodsAnimals were divided into five groups: normal; diabetic control; diabetic received MSCs; diabetic received supernatant of MSCs; diabetic received co-administration of MSCs with supernatant. Blood glucose, insulin levels and body weight of animals were monitored during experiment. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence analysis were performed to monitor functionality and migration of labeled-MSCs to pancreas.ResultsFirst administration of MSCs within the first 3 weeks could not reduce blood glucose, but second administration significantly reduced blood glucose after week four compared to diabetic controls. Daily injection of supernatant could not reduce blood glucose as efficient as MSCs. Interestingly; Co-administration of MSCs with supernatant significantly reduced blood glucose more than other treated groups. Insulin levels and body weight were significantly increased in MSCs + supernatant-treated animals compared to other groups. Immunohistological analysis showed an increase in number and size of islets per section respectively in supernatant, MSCs and MSCs + supernatant-treated groups.ConclusionPresent study exhibited that repeated-injection of MSCs reduced blood glucose and increased serum insulin levels in recipient rats. Injection of supernatant could not reverse hyperglycemia as efficient as MSCs. Interestingly; co-administration of MSCs with supernatant could reverse hyperglycemia more than either group alone.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.