Isolated caudate lobe resection is a feasible procedure and can be undertaken with low morbidity and nil mortality. Careful technique and detailed anatomic knowledge of the caudate lobe are essential for this procedure.

Background and study aims: A study was undertaken to describe the management of post-cholecystectomy biliary fistula according to the type of cholecystectomy. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of 111 patients was undertaken. They were divided into open cholecystectomy (OC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) groups. Results: Of the 111 patients, 38 (34.2 %) underwent LC and 73 (65.8 %) underwent OC. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) diagnosed major bile duct injury (BDI) in 27 patients (38.6 %) in the OC group and in 3 patients (7.9 %) in the LC group (P = 0.001). Endoscopic management was not feasible in 15 patients (13.5 %) because of failed cannulation (n = 3) or complete ligation of the common bile duct (n = 12). Endoscopic therapy stopped leakage in 35 patients (92.1 %) and 58 patients (82.9 %) following LC and OC, respectively, after the exclusion of 3 patients in whom cannulation failed (P = 0 0.150). Major BDI was more commonly detected after OC (P < 0.001). Leakage was controlled endoscopically in 77 patients (98.7 %) with minor BDI and in 16 patients (53.3 %) with major BDI (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Major BDI is more common in patients presenting with bile leakage after OC. ERCP is the first-choice treatment for minor BDI. Surgery plays an important role in major BDI. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatogrphy (MRCP) should be used before ERCP in patients with bile leakage following OC or converted LC.

IOERCP during LC is a safe and effective option for management of CCL.

No abstract

Background/Aims: The need for routine use of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) before major liver resection in jaundiced patients has recently been questioned. Our aim was to present our experience of patients with proximal bile duct cancer who undergo major liver resection without PBD and compare these results with patients without biliary obstruction who underwent major liver resection. Methods: Eighty six consecutive jaundiced patients underwent major liver resection without PBD. The postoperative outcome was compared to the control group, which was the same size and matched. Design: A case-comparison study. Results: Fifty nine jaundiced patients (69%) and 22 non-jaundiced patients (25%) received blood transfusion (p = 0.04). Fifty-three patients (62%) in the jaundiced group and 17 (19%) in the non-jaundiced patients experienced postoperative complications (p = 0.003). A statistically significant difference could not be detected for mortality (6 vs. 2%) and transient liver failure (10 vs. 3%). Those patients who underwent extended right hemihepatectomy (with future liver remnant <50%) express high morbidity (55 vs. 24%; p = 0.04) and mortality (23 vs. 8%; p = 0.001) compared to the non-jaundiced patients. Conclusions: Major liver resection without PBD leaving a liver remnant of more than 50% is safe in jaundiced patients. However, transfusion requirement and morbidity are higher in jaundiced patients than in non-jaundiced patients.

Compared with published studies using choledochoscopy at LCBDE, we found comparable results in terms of the success/failure rate, the morbidity and mortality, the operative time, and the length of hospital stay. LCBDE under fluoroscopic guidance may be as safe and efficient as with choledochoscopic guidance.

Background/Aim:Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgery remains the mainstay of curative treatment. Our objective is to evaluate the outcome of surgical treatment of primary gastric GIST.Materials and Methods:Between January 1997 and April 2008, thirty seven consecutive patients underwent resection for GISTs (35 patients with primary gastric GISTs and two patients with intestinal GISTs who were excluded from the study). These patients underwent upper endoscopy ± biopsy, barium meal and abdominal CT scan. Patients’ demographics and clinical presentations were analyzed. Perioperative parameters measured included operative times, estimated blood loss, intraoperative finding, surgical techniques, morbidity and length of hospitalization. Recurrence and survival were also analyzed.Results:Of the 35 patients with gastric GISTs included in the study, 63% were female. The median age was 59 ± 14 years (range, 23 to 75 years). The primary presenting symptoms were bleeding and dyspepsia; 43% of these tumors were located mainly in the body of the stomach. Tumor size was < 10 cm in 80% of the patients. The average tumor size was 6.3 ±3.2 cm (range from 3 to 13 cm). Regarding the surgical management, 20 patients (57%) underwent gastric wedge resection, eight patients (23%) underwent partial gastrectomy and the remaining seven patients (20%) underwent total gastrectomy. Radical resections were found in 32 patients (91.5%) while palliative resections were found in three patients (8.5%). The resected lymph nodes were negative in 32 patients (91.5%). Recurrence was noted in three patients, with a median time to recurrence of 14.3 months (range, 7 to 28 months). The three- and five-years survival in patients who underwent wedge resection was 92% and 81%, respectively, where it was 95% and 87%, respectively, in patients who underwent gastrectomy (either partial or total). There were no major intraoperative complications or mortalities.Conclusion:Complete surgical resection either through wedge resection or gastrectomy with negative margins remains the gold standard treatment in the management of patients with primary resectable gastric GISTs.

Introduction Digital ischemia with subsequent severe pain and tissue loss is often difficult to treat, with no obvious guidelines or strong evidence in the literature to support a specific treatment modality. Patients who fail medical treatment remain with very limited surgical options due to the difficulty of any intervention in this “no man’s land” area of the hand, as described since 1918. Extended distal periarterial sympathectomy is reported as an effective treatment option since the eighties of last century. The procedure entails large incisions and major technical difficulties. In this study, we describe a less invasive approach with very promising results and equally high success rates. Materials and Methods This was a prospective study. All patients with severe digital ischemia manifesting with bluish discoloration, ulceration, and/or dry gangrene who failed medical treatment underwent distal periarterial sympathectomy for the radial and ulnar arteries, with added digital sympathectomy in very severe cases. Primary endpoints were ulcer healing and improvement in pain scores assessed by Visual Analog Scale pain scoring system. Secondary endpoints included complications and amputation rates. Results This study recruited 17 patients between January 2019 and January 2020. The mean follow-up was 14.6 months. The mean age was 33.71 (±SD 13.14) years. 41% were males. 59% suffered from vasculitis, 35% of patients had dry gangrene, and 71% had ulcers. Periarterial radial and ulnar sympathectomy was performed for all cases, with digital sympathectomy for 12 fingers. We had 50% complete ulcer healing within 1 month ( p = 0.031), and 100% were completely healed at 6 months ( p < 0.001). Pain scores showed significant reductions at 1 ( p = 0.001) and 6 months ( p < 0.001) of follow-up. Conclusion Distal periarterial sympathectomy demonstrates high success rates in terms of pain relief and ulcer healing in severe digital ischemia.