Background: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States, with over 50,000 deaths estimated in 2014. Molecular profiling for somatic mutations that predict absence of response to anti-EGFR therapy has become standard practice in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer; however, the quantity and type of tissue available for testing is frequently limited. Further, the degree to which the primary tumor is a faithful representation of metastatic disease has been questioned. As next-generation sequencing technology becomes more widely available for clinical use and additional molecularly targeted agents are considered as treatment options in colorectal cancer, it is important to characterize the extent of tumor heterogeneity between primary and metastatic tumors. Results: We performed deep coverage, targeted next-generation sequencing of 230 key cancer-associated genes for 69 matched primary and metastatic tumors and normal tissue. Mutation profiles were 100% concordant for KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF, and were highly concordant for recurrent alterations in colorectal cancer. Additionally, whole genome sequencing of four patient trios did not reveal any additional site-specific targetable alterations.
52 Background: Trastuzumab (T) combined with chemotherapy has been the standard of care for pts with HER2+ EG cancer. Resistance to T is now emerging in this population. Afatinib (A), a potent ErbB Family Blocker, induced nearly complete tumor regression in MSKCC HER2+ patient derived xenografts (PDX). We report the initial results of a phase II study of afatinib in patients with T refractory EG cancer. Methods: Pts with HER2+ (IHC 3+ or FISH>2.0) EG adenocarcinoma –progressive on trastuzumab -received A 40 mg. Archival pre-T tissue, tumor biopsy after progression on T and after 1 week on A mandated on protocol. The primary endpoint-overall clinical benefit at 4 months: stable disease (SD) or partial response (PR). Results: 14 pts treated with A; median duration 5.1 mos (1.7 to 12.1 mos). Median age 62, KPS 80, median 2 (1 to 4) prior T containing regimens, 64% of tumors IHC3+; 36% IHC2+/FISH>2.2. Adverse events included: diarrhea (Grade 1/2:69%), fatigue (Grade 1/2:54%), rash (Grade 1/2:54%), mucositis (Grade 1:23%), paronychia (Grade 1/2:15%). To date, 13 pts evaluable for response, 3 of 13 pts (23%) had disease stabilization (PR or SD); 1 pt with confirmed PR - a durable 75% regression of biopsy proven metastases. Median OS 6.6 mos (1.9 to NR). PDXs established from biopsies of T refractory tumors of 5 pts. Next generation sequencing of matched pre-T and post-T progression tumors from 6 pts was performed and results will be reported. Conclusions: Afatinib shows clinical efficacy in patients with T refractory EG cancer. The study has been expanded to accrue additional patients. Efforts to elucidate the mechanisms of T resistance including validation of potential drivers of T resistance using HER2+ PDXs are ongoing. Updated molecular and clinical data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01522768.
160 Background: ICARuS is a randomized phase II, multicenter trial to evaluate the relative efficacy of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with mitomycin C vs. Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (EPIC) with floxuridine (FUDR), after cytoreductive surgery (CRS), for the treatment of peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal (CRC) or appendiceal cancer (AC). PRODIGE7 results failed to demonstrate benefit of HIPEC therapy after complete gross resection of CRC PM, prompting termination of CRC accrual and early cohort analysis. Methods: Patients with isolated, confirmed PM were eligible for 1:1 randomization to CRS plus HIPEC with mitomycin C or CRS plus EPIC with FUDR. Patients were stratified by recent systemic chemotherapy and disease (AC vs. CRC). The trial was originally powered to evaluate 212 patients for a 20% gain in a primary endpoint of 3-year progression free survival (PFS: HR = 1.75). Results: Seventy-five CRC patients were included between 4/2013 and 12/2018 for HIPEC (N = 40) or EPIC (N = 35) treatment. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. After a median follow up of 36 months, the median PFS was 7.7 months (95% CI: 6.3-11.1) in the HIPEC arm and 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.1-21.9) in the EPIC arm, HR = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.42-1.14) p = 0.14. In the 42 left-sided primary cancers, the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.4-17.7) in the HIPEC arm and 12.5 months (95% CI: 8.1-NR) in the EPIC arm, HR = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.29-1.22) p = 0.14. In the 33 right-sided primary cancers, the median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.5-14.1) in the HIPEC arm and 8 months (95% CI: 5.8-24.1) in the EPIC arm, HR = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.39-1.64) p = 0.53. PFS was significantly better in the EPIC arm among patients with BRAF wildtype (WT) tumors and patients with higher PM burden (PCI > 7). There was no difference between HIPEC and EPIC in the primary toxicity endpoint of complications grade 3 or above (23 vs. 34%, p = 0.3). Conclusions: Three-year PFS did not significantly differ between treatment arms. The lack of survival benefit of HIPEC in the entire cohort and in subset analysis is consistent with the findings of PRODIGE7. ICARuS remains open to accrual for AC. These data support further investigation of the potential benefit of EPIC with CRS in carefully selected patients with CRC PM. Clinical trial information: NCT01815359 .
In the paper titled "Asymptomatic Liver Abscesses Mimicking Metastases in Patients after Whipple Surgery: Infectious Complications following Percutaneous Biopsy-A Report of Two Cases" the misspelled last name of the 2nd author was "Mayody" and is corrected as above.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.