Aims: Experiments were conducted to evaluate the specificity and rapidity of the application of conventional, immunoassay and direct Polymerase Chain Reaction (dPCR) techniques in the detection of Bacillus cereus and its toxins in contaminated rice. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK, between May 2015 and December 2015. Methodology: Conventional testing for the presence of B. cereus and associated toxins was achieved using Polymixin Egg-yolk Mannitol Agar (PEMBA) culture plates while immunoassays were conducted using a commercially available Reverse Passive Latex Agglutination (TD0950 BCET-RPLA, Oxoid, UK) kit. Direct PCR was used to detect the HBL-E gene in the food samples and the PCR amplicons were visualised after separation by gel electrophoresis. Results: Total Mean B. cereus count was recorded as 5.3 ×107 cfu / g of the rice sample from the PEMBA plate culture. The PEMBA method was the least in terms of rapidity of assay completion. Further assays such as the RPLA and dPCR assays were tested for potential in overcoming this limitation. Results from the immunological study showed that sample agglutination with sensitised latex beads was only positive up to the 10-2 dilution which is an indication of the presence of the Haemolysin BL enterotoxin (HBL-E). The PCR assay had the lowest limit of detection (5.3 ×106 cfu / g) thereby suggesting that the method has very low sensitivity for the bacteria. However, the PEMBA method was more sensitive but had highest detection limit (100 cfu / g) than the RPLA assay (5.3 ×105 cfu / g). Conclusion: Although the dPCR had the advantage of producing results within a short time, it was less sensitive to B. cereus than RPLA and PEMBA assays. A development of improved highly sensitive assay for the toxin has the potential to enhance food safety.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.