Multiple types of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers exist, allowing interference with the system at the level of renin, angiotensin-converting enzyme, or the angiotensin II receptor. Yet, in particular, for the treatment of hypertension, the number of patients with uncontrolled hypertension continues to rise, either due to patient noncompliance or because of the significant renin rises that may, at least partially, overcome the effect of RAS blockade (RAS escape). New approaches to target the RAS are either direct antisense oligonucleotides that inhibit angiotensinogen RNA translation, or small interfering RNA (siRNA) that function via the RNA interference pathway. Since all angiotensins stem from angiotensinogen, lowering angiotensinogen has the potential to circumvent the RAS escape phenomenon. Moreover, antisense oligonucleotides and small interfering RNA require injections only every few weeks to months, which might reduce noncompliance. Of course, angiotensinogen suppression also poses a threat in situations where the RAS is acutely needed, for instance in women becoming pregnant during treatment, or in cases of emergency, when severe hypotension occurs. This review discusses all preclinical data on angiotensinogen suppression, as well as the limited clinical data that are currently available. It concludes that it is an exciting new tool to target the RAS with high specificity and a low side effect profile. Its long-term action might revolutionize pharmacotherapy, as it could overcome compliance problems. Preclinical and clinical programs are now carefully investigating its efficacy and safety profile, allowing an optimal introduction as a novel drug to treat cardiovascular and renal diseases in due time.

Background and Purpose: Small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting liver angiotensinogen lowers blood pressure, but its effects in hypertensive diabetes are unknown.Experimental Approach: To address this, TGR (mRen2)27 rats (angiotensin IIdependent hypertension model) were made diabetic with streptozotocin over 18 weeks and treated with either vehicle, angiotensinogen siRNA, the AT 1 antagonist valsartan, the ACE inhibitor captopril, valsartan + siRNA or valsartan + captopril for the final 3 weeks. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured via radiotelemetry.Key Results: MAP before treatment was 153 ± 2 mmHg. Diabetes resulted in albuminuria, accompanied by glomerulosclerosis and podocyte effacement, without a change in glomerular filtration rate. All treatments lowered MAP and cardiac hypertrophy, and the largest drop in MAP was observed with siRNA + valsartan. Treatment with siRNA lowered circulating angiotensinogen by >99%, and the lowest circulating angiotensin II and aldosterone levels occurred in the dual treatment groups. Angiotensinogen siRNA did not affect renal angiotensinogen mRNA expression, confirming its liver-specificity. Furthermore, only siRNA with or without valsartan lowered renal angiotensin I. All treatments lowered renal angiotensin II and the reduction was largest (>95%) in the siRNA + valsartan group. All treatments Abbreviations: MAP, mean arterial pressure; RAS, renin-angiotensin-system; TGR (mRen2)27, Transgenic rat (mRen2)27.Edwyn O. Cruz-L opez and Liwei Ren contributed equally to this work.

No abstract

In recent years, perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) research has gained special attention in an effort to understand its involvement in vascular function. PVAT is recognized as an important endocrine organ that secretes procontractile and anticontractile factors, including components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, particularly angiotensinogen (AGT). This review critically addresses the occurrence of AGT in PVAT, its release into the blood stream, and its contribution to the generation and effects of angiotensins (notably angiotensin-(1-7) and angiotensin II) in the vascular wall. It describes that the introduction of transgenic animals, expressing AGT at 0, 1, or more specific location(s), combined with the careful measurement of angiotensins, has revealed that the assumption that PVAT independently generates angiotensins from locally synthesized AGT is incorrect. Indeed, selective deletion of AGT from adipocytes did not lower circulating AGT, neither under a control diet nor under a high-fat diet, and only liver-specific AGT deletion resulted in the disappearance of AGT from blood plasma and adipose tissue. An entirely novel scenario therefore develops, supporting local angiotensin generation in PVAT that depends on the uptake of both AGT and renin from blood, in addition to the possibility that circulating angiotensins exert vascular effects. The review ends with a summary of where we stand now and recommendations for future research.

No abstract

Although the existence of a brain renin–angiotensin system (RAS) had been proposed five decades ago, we still struggle to understand how it functions. The main reason for this is the virtual lack of renin at brain tissue sites. Moreover, although renin’s substrate, angiotensinogen, appears to be synthesized locally in the brain, brain angiotensin (Ang) II disappeared after selective silencing of hepatic angiotensinogen. This implies that brain Ang generation depends on hepatic angiotensinogen after all. Rodrigues et al. (Clin Sci (Lond) (2021) 135:1353–1367) generated a transgenic mouse model overexpressing full-length rat angiotensinogen in astrocytes, and observed massively elevated brain Ang II levels, increased sympathetic nervous activity and vasopressin, and up-regulated erythropoiesis. Yet, blood pressure and kidney function remained unaltered, and surprisingly no other Ang metabolites occurred in the brain. Circulating renin was suppressed. This commentary critically discusses these findings, concluding that apparently in the brain, overexpressed angiotensinogen can be cleaved by an unidentified non-renin enzyme, yielding Ang II directly, which then binds to Ang receptors, allowing no metabolism by angiotensinases like ACE2 and aminopeptidase A. Future studies should now unravel the identity of this non-renin enzyme, and determine whether it also contributes to Ang II generation at brain tissue sites in wildtype animals. Such studies should also re-evaluate the concept that Ang-(1-7) and Ang III, generated by ACE2 and aminopeptidase A, respectively, have important functions in the brain.