The numbers of cases and deaths from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are continuously increasing. Many people are concerned about the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines. We performed a comprehensive analysis of the published trials of COVID-19 vaccines and the real-world data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Globally, our research found that the efficacy of all vaccines exceeded 70%, and RNA-based vaccines had the highest efficacy of 94.29%; moreover, Black or African American people, young people, and males may experience greater vaccine efficacy. The spectrum of vaccine-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is extremely broad, and the most frequent ADRs are pain, fatigue, and headache. Most ADRs are tolerable and are mainly grade 1 or 2 in severity. Some severe ADRs have been identified (thromboembolic events, 21-75 cases per million doses; myocarditis/pericarditis, 2-3 cases per million doses). In summary, vaccines are a powerful tool that can be used to control the COVID-19 pandemic, with high efficacy and tolerable ADRs. In addition, the spectrum of ADRs associated with the vaccines is broad, and most of the reactions appear within a week, although some may be delayed. Therefore, ADRs after vaccination need to be identified and addressed in a timely manner.

Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) is considered an autoimmune-like disease mediated by donor CD4+ T cells, but the origin of the autoreactive T cells is still controversial. Here, we report that transplantation of DBA/2 donor spleen cells into thymectomized MHC-matched allogeneic BALB/c recipients induced autoimmune-like cGVHD, although not in control syngeneic DBA/2 recipients. The donor-type CD4+ T cells from the former but not the latter recipients induced autoimmune-like manifestations in secondary allogeneic BALB/c as well as syngeneic DBA/2 recipients. Transfer of donor-type CD4+ T cells from secondary DBA/2 recipients with disease into syngeneic donor-type or allogeneic host-type tertiary recipients propagated autoimmune-like manifestations in both. Furthermore, TCR spectratyping revealed that the clonal expansion of the autoreactive CD4+ T cells in cGVHD recipients was initiated by alloimmune response. Finally, hybridoma CD4+ T clones derived from DBA/2 recipients with disease proliferated similarly to stimulation by syngeneic donor-type or allogeneic host-type DCs. These results demonstrate that the autoimmune-like manifestations in cGVHD can be mediated by a population of donor CD4+ T cells in transplants that simultaneously recognize antigens presented by both donor and host APCs.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose To report outcomes of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease from a clinical trial of antimetabolite therapies. Design Subanalysis from an observer-masked randomized clinical trial for non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and pan- uveitis. Methods Setting clinical practice at Aravind Eye Hospitals, India Patient Population Forty-three of 80 patients enrolled (54%) diagnosed with VKH. Intervention Patients were randomized to either 25mg oral methotrexate weekly or 1g mycophenolate mofetil twice daily, with a corticosteroid taper. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation at 5 and 6 months. Secondary outcomes included visual acuity, central subfield thickness, and adverse events. Patients were categorized as acute (diagnosis ≤3 months prior to enrollment) or chronic (diagnosis >3 months prior to enrollment). Results Twenty-seven patients were randomized to methotrexate and 16 to mycophenolate mofetil; 30 had acute VKH. The odds of achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation with methotrexate were 2.5 times (95% CI: 0.6, 9.8; P=0.20) the odds with mycophenolate mofetil, a difference which was not statistically significant. The average improvement in visual acuity was 12.5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters. On average, visual acuity for patients with acute VKH improved by 14 more ETDRS letters than those with chronic VKH (P<0.001), but there was no difference in corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation (P=0.99). All 26 eyes with a serous retinal detachment at baseline resolved, and 88% achieved corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation. Conclusions The majority of patients treated with antimetabolites and corticosteroids were able to achieve corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation by 6 months. Although patients with acute VKH gained more visual improvement than those with chronic VKH, this did not correspond with a higher rate of controlled inflammation.

Manual limbal markings and iris-registration software were equally effective and safe in LASIK for myopic astigmatism, showing that checking cyclotorsion by manual limbal markings is a safe alternative when automated systems are not available.

Electrophysiologic and hemodynamic studies were performed before and after intravenous infusion of a new antiarrhythmic agent, propafenone, in 28 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia. Propafenone was given at a loading dose of 2 mg/kg in all patients. Subsequently, group A, the first 14 patients, received 1 mg/min and group B, the second 14 patients, received 2 mg/min continuous infusion. Propafenone exerted no effect on sinus nodal recovery time and sinoatrial conduction time, but significantly prolonged atrioventricular (AV) nodal and His-Purkinje conduction time and the QRS duration (respectively, 95 +/- 19, 48 +/- 10 and 120 +/- 23 ms before, and 110 +/- 28, 53 +/- 10 and 135 +/- 27 ms after; p less than 0.001). Propafenone did not change the mean arterial blood pressure but slightly increased right atrial, pulmonary artery and capillary wedge pressures resulting in mild depression of the cardiac index (2.6 +/- 0.8 liters/min per m2 before and 2.3 +/- 0.7 liters/min per m2 after; p less than 0.001). None of the patients were symptomatic from these changes. In group A, propafenone did not affect the inducibility of ventricular tachycardia except for one patient whose arrhythmia was sustained before and become nonsustained after propafenone. In group B, sustained ventricular tachycardia became noninducible in three patients and nonsustained in two patients, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia became noninducible in one patient after propafenone. Therefore, an appropriate loading dose of intravenous propafenone such as 2 mg/kg followed by 2 mg/min infusion may be given safely and may suppress ventricular tachycardia. Propafenone may be a useful addition to currently available antiarrhythmic agents.