Corticosteroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) remains a significant source of morbidity after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. No standard therapy exists in this setting; however, recent studies have demonstrated a very promising role for ruxolitinib, an oral Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor. With increasing evidence of efficacy for SR-GVHD, limited data exist describing complications of ruxolitinib use, specifically infectious complications during use in SR-GVHD. In this study we report outcomes and infectious complications at our institution with ruxolitinib use. Overall, 43 patients were treated with ruxolitinib for SR-GVHD, 19 for acute SR-GVHD and 24 for chronic SR-GVHD. With respect to acute SR-GVHD, 15 patients had grade III acute GVHD and 4 patients had grade IV acute GVHD. At 28 days, a response rate of 84% was detected. With respect to chronic SR-GVHD, 16 patients had moderate refractory disease and 8 had severe refractory disease. At around 28 days, a 63% response rate was detected. Overall, 42% of patients (n = 18) treated with ruxolitinib had a documented infectious event. Infectious events were significantly more common among patients treated for acute SR-GVHD (P < .005). Among patients treated for acute SR-GVHD, both viral (n = 11) and bacterial (n = 10) events were frequently encountered. Cytomegalovirus reactivation was detected in 4 patients without organ involvement in any patient. Bacteremia was the most common bacterial event (n = 8), and 2 patients died after development of bacteremia. Only 5 of 24 patients treated with ruxolitinib for chronic SR-GVHD developed infectious complications after initiation of therapy. Nearly an even number of viral (n = 3) and bacterial (n = 4) were detected. This study supports the use of ruxolitinib in SR-GVHD, with impressive responses observed in both acute and chronic SR-GVHD. Infectious complications were particularly frequent among patients treated for acute SR-GVHD, and nearly all these patients were concurrently on high-dose steroids while on ruxolitinib. This study suggests careful monitoring for viral reactivation is required for patients initiated on ruxolitinib, supports the role of continuing prophylactic antimicrobial measures in ruxolitinib-treated GVHD patients, and raises the question of whether bacterial prophylaxis should be considered among patients initiated on ruxolitinib for acute SR-GVHD, particularly while on high-dose steroids.

No abstract