BACKGROUND
Arrhythmias, conduction abnormalities, and intracardiac thrombus are common in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Outcomes of direct-current cardioversion (DCCV) for atrial arrhythmias in patients with CA are unknown.
OBJECTIVES
This study sought to examine DCCV procedural outcomes in patients with CA.
METHODS
Patients with CA scheduled for DCCV for atrial arrhythmias from January 2000 through December 2012 were identified and matched 2:1 with control patients by age, sex, type of atrial arrhythmia, and date of DCCV.
RESULTS
CA patients (n = 58, mean age 69 ± 9 years, 81% male) were included. CA patients had a significantly higher cardioversion cancellation rate (28% vs. 7%; p < 0.001) compared with control patients, mainly due to intracardiac thrombus identified on transesophageal echocardiogram (13 of 16 [81%] vs. 2 of 8 [25%]; p = 0.02); 4 of 13 of the CA patients (31%) with intracardiac thrombus on transesophageal echocardiogram received adequate anticoagulation ≥3 weeks and another 2 of 13 (15%) had arrhythmia duration <48 h. DCCV success rate (90% vs. 94%; p = 0.4) was not different. Procedural complications were more frequent in CA versus control patients (6 of 42 [14%] vs. 2 of 106 [2%]; p = 0.007); complications in CA included ventricular arrhythmias in 2 and severe bradyarrhythmias requiring pacemaker implantation in 2. The only complication in the control group was self-limited bradyarrhythmias.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with CA undergoing DCCV had a significantly high cancellation rate mainly due to a high incidence of intracardiac thrombus even among patients who received adequate anticoagulation. Although the success rate of restoring sinus rhythm was high, tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias complicating DCCV were significantly more frequent in CA patients compared with control patients. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:589–97)
ObjectivesTo examine the prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation (AF) versus sinus rhythm (SR) on the management and outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).Methods1847 consecutive patients with severe AS (aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 and aortic valve systolic mean Doppler gradient ≥40 mm Hg or peak velocity ≥4 m/s) and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% were identified. The independent association of AF and all-cause mortality was assessed.ResultsAge was 76±11 years and 46% were female; 293 (16%) patients had AF and 1554 (84%) had SR. In AF, 72% were symptomatic versus 71% in SR. Survival rate at 5 years for AF (41%) was lower than SR (65%) (age- and sex-adjusted HR=1.66 (1.40–1.98), p<0.0001). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with mortality included age (HR per 10 years=1.55 (1.42–1.69), p<0.0001), dyspnoea (HR=1.58 (1.33–1.87), p<0.0001), ≥ moderate mitral regurgitation (HR=1.63 (1.22–2.18), p=0.001), right ventricular systolic dysfunction (HR=1.88 (1.52–2.33), p<0.0001), left atrial volume index (HR per 10 mL/m2=1.13 (1.07–1.19), p<0.0001) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) (HR=0.44 (0.38–0.52), p<0.0001). AF was not a predictor of mortality independent of variables strongly correlated HR=1.02 (0.84–1.25), p=0.81). The 1-year probability of AVR following diagnosis of severe AS was lower in AF (49.8%) than SR (62.5%) (HR=0.73 (0.62–0.86), p<0.001); among patients with AF not referred for AVR, symptoms were frequently attributed to AF instead of AS.ConclusionAF was associated with poor prognosis in patients with severe AS, but apparent differences in outcomes compared with SR were explained by factors other than AF including concomitant cardiac abnormalities and deferral of AVR due to attribution of cardiac symptoms to AF.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.