Transcription of the c-fos proto-oncogene is greatly increased within minutes of administering purified growth factors to quiescent 3T3 cells. This stimulation is the most rapid transcriptional response to peptide growth factors yet described, and implies a role for c-fos in cell-cycle control. Transformation by c-fos may result from a temporal deregulation of this control.
The three-dimensional structure of the basic/helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper domain of the transcription factor Max complexed with DNA has been determined by X-ray crystallography at 2.9 A resolution. Max binds as a dimer to its recognition sequence CACGTG by direct contacts between the alpha-helical basic region and the major groove. This symmetric homodimer, a new protein fold, is a parallel, left-handed, four-helix bundle, with each monomer containing two alpha-helical segments separated by a loop. The two alpha-helical segments are composed of the basic region plus helix 1 and helix 2 plus the leucine repeat, respectively. As in GCN4, the leucine repeat forms a parallel coiled coil.
Mutagenesis of the fos protein supports the hypothesis that a heptad repeat of leucine residues stabilizes the interaction between the fos and jun proteins. We show that the complex between fos and jun can bind to DNA more tightly than either protein alone and that basic residues adjacent to the leucine repeat of fos contribute to the DNA-binding potential of the complex.
Stimulation of quiescent 3T3 cells with purified growth factors or of the pheochromocytoma cell line PC12 with nerve growth factor results in the rapid transient induction of c-fos, c-myc, and actin gene transcription (M.E. Greenberg and E.B. Ziff, Nature [London] 312:711-716; M.E. Greenberg, L.A. Greene, and E.B. Ziff, J. Biol. Chem. 26:14101-14110). We used protein synthesis inhibitors to investigate whether synthesis of new proteins plays a role in the rapid induction and subsequent repression of the transcription of these genes. Pretreatment of quiescent 3T3 cells with the inhibitor anisomycin before growth factor stimulation caused a superinduction of c-fos and c-myc mRNA levels upon growth factor addition. Nuclear runoff transcription analyses of 3T3 cells indicated that anisomycin potentiated c-fos, c-myc, and also actin expression at the transcriptional level, possibly by inhibiting transcriptional repression. Somewhat different results were obtained when PC12 cells were incubated with either anisomycin or cycloheximide. In PC12 cells protein synthesis inhibitors superinduced nerve growth factor activation of c-fos mRNA production but completely abolished the activation of c-myc. The results suggest that in PC12 cells c-fos transcription is activated by a protein-synthesis-independent mechanism, whereas c-myc stimulation requires new protein synthesis. The difference in the effect of anisomycin on growth factor activation of c-myc expression in 3T3 versus PC12 cells may be due to differential stringency of protein synthesis inhibition in the two cells or could reflect cell type differences in c-myc regulation.
The PICK1 protein interacts in neurons with the AMPA-type glutamate receptor subunit 2 (GluR2) and with several other membrane receptors via its single PDZ domain. We show that PICK1 also binds in neurons and in heterologous cells to protein kinase Calpha (PKCalpha) and that the interaction is highly dependent on the activation of the kinase. The formation of PICK1-PKCalpha complexes is strongly induced by TPA, and PICK1-PKCalpha complexes are cotargeted with PICK1-GluR2 complexes to spines, where GluR2 is found to be phosphorylated by PKC on serine 880. PICK1 also reduces the plasma membrane levels of the GluR2 subunit, consistent with a targeting function of PICK1 and a PKC-facilitated release of GluR2 from the synaptic anchoring proteins ABP and GRIP. This work indicates that PICK1 functions as a targeting and transport protein that directs the activated form of PKCalpha to GluR2 in spines, leading to the activity-dependent release of GluR2 from synaptic anchor proteins and the PICK1-dependent transport of GluR2 from the synaptic membrane.
We show that c‐Myc, in addition to activating transcription through E‐box Myc binding sites (Ems), also represses transcription by a mechanism dependent on initiator (Inr) elements of the basal promoters of susceptible genes. Repression was first observed as a component of c‐Myc biphasic regulation of the adenovirus‐2 major late promoter (MLP), which contains both Inr and Ems sequences. Two differentiation‐specific genes containing Inr, the C/EBP alpha and albumin genes, are repressed through their basal promoters by c‐Myc, but are activated by the related B‐HLH‐LZ factor, USF. Repression requires both the B‐HLH‐LZ and Myc box II (MBII) domains. Significantly, a MBII deletion mutant which is deficient in repression, but transactivates normally, fails to cooperate with an activated ras gene to transform primary fibroblasts. Thus Myc‐dependent transactivation is insufficient for Ras cooperation and the novel transcription repression function is implicated in Ras cooperation as well as the suppression of Inr‐dependent genes.
AMPA-receptor (AMPAR) transport to synapses plays a critical role in the modulation of synaptic strength. We show that the functionally critical GluR2 subunit stably resides in an intracellular pool in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). GluR2 in this pool is extensively complexed with GluR3 but not with GluR1, which is mainly confined to the cell surface. Mutagenesis revealed that elements in the C terminus including the PDZ motif are required for GluR2 forward-transport from the ER. Surprisingly, ER retention of GluR2 is controlled by Arg607 at the Q/R-editing site. Reversion to Gln (R607Q) resulted in rapid release from the pool and elevated surface expression of GluR2 in neurons. Therefore, Arg607 is a central regulator. In addition to channel gating, it also controls ER exit and may thereby ensure the availability of GluR2 for assembly into AMPARs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.