Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant reductions in transplantation, motivated in part by concerns of disproportionately more severe disease among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, clinical features, outcomes, and predictors of mortality in SOT recipients are not well-described. Methods We performed a multi-center cohort study of SOT recipients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Data were collected using standardized intake and 28-day follow-up electronic case report forms. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the primary endpoint, 28-day mortality, among hospitalized patients. Results Four hundred eighty-two SOT recipients from >50 transplant centers were included: 318 (66%) kidney or kidney/pancreas, 73 (15.1%) liver, 57 (11.8%) heart, and 30 (6.2%) lung. Median age was 58 (IQR 46-57), median time post-transplant was 5 years (IQR 2-10), 61% were male, and 92% had ≥1 underlying comorbidity. Among those hospitalized (376 [78%]), 117 (31%) required mechanical ventilation, and 77 (20.5%) died by 28 days after diagnosis. Specific underlying comorbidities (age >65 [aOR 3.0, 95%CI 1.7-5.5, p<0.001], congestive heart failure [aOR 3.2, 95%CI 1.4-7.0, p=0.004], chronic lung disease [aOR 2.5, 95%CI 1.2-5.2, p=0.018], obesity [aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.4, p=0.039]) and presenting findings (lymphopenia [aOR 1.9, 95%CI 1.1-3.5, p=0.033], abnormal chest imaging [aOR 2.9, 95%CI 1.1-7.5, p=0.027]) were independently associated with mortality. Multiple measures of immunosuppression intensity were not associated with mortality. Conclusions Mortality among SOT recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 was 20.5%. Age and underlying comorbidities rather than immunosuppression intensity-related measures were major drivers of mortality.

To discern whether the characteristics and outcome of invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients have evolved during the past decade, 26 patients who underwent transplantation during 1990-1995 (known as "the earlier cohort") were compared with 20 patients who underwent transplantation during 1998-2001 (known as "the later cohort"). Twenty-three percent of the Aspergillus infections in the earlier cohort occurred у90 days after transplantation, compared with 55% of such infections in the later cohort ( ). The earlier cohort P p .026 was significantly more likely to have disseminated infection ( ) and central nervous system (CNS) in-P p .034 volvement ( ) than was the later cohort. The mortality rate was significantly higher for the earlier cohort P p .0004 (92%) than for the later cohort (60%;). Only disseminated infection (not the year of transplantation) P p .012 approached statistical significance as an independent predictor of outcome. In the current era, invasive aspergillosis occurs later in the posttransplantation period, is less likely to be associated with CNS infection, and is associated with a lower mortality rate, compared with invasive aspergillosis in the early 1990s.Invasive aspergillosis has long been recognized as one of the most significant opportunistic fungal infections in liver transplant recipients [1][2][3][4]. The frequency of invasive aspergillosis among liver transplant recipients ranges from 1% to 6% [2]. However, the mortality rate for these patients exceeds 90% [1,5]; an estimated 16.9% of all deaths that have occurred among liver

To determine the spectrum and impact of mycelial fungal infections, particularly those due to non-Aspergillus molds, 53 liver and heart transplant recipients with invasive mycelial infections were prospectively identified in a multicenter study. Invasive mycelial infections were due to Aspergillus species in 69.8% of patients, to non-Aspergillus hyalohyphomycetes in 9.4%, to phaeohyphomycetes in 9.4%, to zygomycetes in 5.7%, and to other causes in 5.7%. Infections due to mycelial fungi other than Aspergillus species were significantly more likely to be associated with disseminated (P=.005) and central nervous system (P=.07) infection than were those due to Aspergillus species. Overall mortality at 90 days was 54.7%. The associated mortality rate was 100% for zygomycosis, 80% for non-Aspergillus hyalohyphomycosis, 54% for aspergillosis, and 20% for phaeohyphomycosis. Thus, non-Aspergillus molds have emerged as significant pathogens in organ transplant recipients. These molds are more likely to be associated with disseminated infections and to be associated with poorer outcomes than is aspergillosis.

Our study has identified predictors for Candida infections in the current era that have implications relevant for targeting the prophylaxis toward the high-risk patients. Routine use of antifungal prophylaxis warrants concern given the emergence of non-albicans Candida spp. as significant pathogens after liver transplantation and higher mortality in patients with these infections.

Invasive aspergillosis occurred in 26 liver transplant recipients since 1990 at five liver transplant centers. The median time to onset was 17 days after transplantation. Twenty-seven percent of the patients had undergone retransplantation. Invasive aspergillosis occurred significantly earlier after transplantation in smokers than in nonsmokers (P=0.017). Patients with late-onset aspergillosis (occurring after posttransplant day 90) were more likely to have had prior cytomegalovirus infection than those with early-onset aspergillosis (occurring within 90 days of transplantation) (67% vs. 10%, respectively, P=0.013). Only 8% of the patients had received additional corticosteroids or OKT3, which suggests that augmented immunosuppression may not be a relevant risk factor for invasive aspergillosis in the 1990s due to less frequent use of these agents. The median serum bilirubin level of the patients was 21.8 mg/dl, 85% of the patients had renal insufficiency, and 54% were on dialysis before the onset of invasive aspergillosis, which suggest that overall severity of illness, including poorly functioning hepatic allograft and renal failure may be the major determinants of disease occurrence. Overall mortality was 92% (24/26). No difference in mortality could be shown for the patients who received amphotericin B versus liposomal amphotericin B preparations (100% vs. 89%); however, the mean time to death after the initiation of therapy was 20 days in patients who received amphotericin B and 43 days in those who received liposomal amphotericin B preparations.