Background Primary CNS tumors constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that share a considerable morbidity and mortality rate. To help control tumor growth and clinical outcomes (overall survival, progression-free survival, quality of life) symptoms, patients often resort to alternative therapies, including the use of cannabis. Despite rapidly growing popularity, cannabis and its impact on patients with primary malignant CNS tumors is understudied. Methods To shed light on the lack of scientific evidence in this field, in November 2018 we conducted a search and examination of cannabis in neuro-oncology in major journal databases and bibliographies of selected articles, and through abstracts of annual meetings using prespecified criteria in line with the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Results We identified 45 publications, of which 9 were selected. Five studies were included. Publication dates ranged from 2004 to 2018 and included varying histologies of primary brain tumors. The average survival at 1 year was 56.09% (95% CI: 48.28-63.9). There was no difference in risk ratio (RR) for death at 1 year between groups (RR: 1.069 [95% CI: 0.139-8.25]). We found strong evidence of heterogeneity (Q = 74.0%; P = .021). We found no statistical evidence of publication bias (P = .117; SD = 1.91). Conclusions There was limited moderate-quality evidence that supports the use of cannabinoids as adjuvant to the standard of care in the treatment of brain and CNS tumors. There was very low-quality evidence suggesting that cannabinoids were associated with adult-onset gliomas. Further prospective clinical trials are necessary to adequately evaluate the impact of cannabinoids on CNS tumors, specifically on survival and quality of life.
BACKGROUND Gliomas are devastating primary tumors of the central nervous system that often present with difficult to manage symptoms in addition to the antineoplastic tumor itself. Due to recent increase in popularity and societal acceptance of cannabis products, their use by glioma patients has increased. METHODS We conducted a single center, prospective study: patients with glioma answered a locally validated survey to inquire about their cannabis use at baseline and every three months. Quality of Life was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30, its complementary module BN-20 and the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Eligible participants were classified as cannabis users or non-users. We performed linear regression clustered by subjects to see differences by user group and trends overtime. RESULTS To date, 89 patients agreed to participate, enrolled, and answered the baseline questionnaires, and 64 have answered the 3 month follow up survey. The mean age was 49.7(SD 13.74), 55 were male, 55 were cannabis users at baseline (61.8%) and 34 at 3 months (53.13%). Patients who were cannabis users scored 11.73 lower points at baseline when compared to non-users (79.65 [SD 18.93] vs 67.92 [SD 19.22]) in the QLQ-C30 instrument. Similarly, cannabis users recorded 9.624 lower points at 3 months compared to non-users (70.1 [SD 21.33] vs 79.72 [SD13.95]). The difference-in-difference estimator was 2.108 (p< 0.7). CONCLUSION Although we observed cannabis users scoring lower QoL measurements (p< 0.05) at baseline and 3 months, we observed a slight improvement in QoL of cannabis users while observing no change or decline (in some measures) among non-users. Our findings provide insight to the impact that cannabis has in QoL over time. While not conclusive, these preliminary results need to be studied on a longer-term basis with a larger sample size in order to detect trends on quality of life among patients with different tumor types.
BACKGROUND Nearly 80,000 new cases of primary brain tumors are expected to be diagnosed this year in the United States: 32% of CNS tumors are malignant. Anecdotally, patients who report use of cannabis, frequently describe higher quality of life scores (QOL) in standardized instruments. However, the lack of available tools that allow systematic documentation of cannabis use results in a barrier to accurately assess efficacy and potential benefits and risks. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a single center, observational study: patients with primary brain tumors answered a previously validated instrument to explore cannabis use. QOL was assessed using the instruments from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC): QLQ-C30 and its complementary module BN-20 as well as the EuroQol group’s instrument EQ-5D-5L. Eligible participants were identified as cannabis users or non-users, completing the instruments in a self-administered fashion. RESULTS To date, 45 patients who signed informed consent were enrolled and answered the questionnaires, mean age was 51 (SD 13.5) years, 31 were male, 25 were considered active cannabis users (624% males and 36% females). At baseline, the mean Global Health score in the QLQ-C30 instrument was 68.6 (SD: 20.6) among cannabis users and 82 (SD: 18.05) among non-users. The mean difference in Global Health QOL scores between users and non-users was 13.35 (95%CI: 1.34, 25.35; p=0.03). In contrast the difference between cannabis users and non-users in QOL index in the EQ-5D-5L instrument was 0.13 (0.77 vs 0.91; p=0.002). Among cannabis users, patients perceive their symptoms as moderate before using cannabis and mild after using cannabis (p>0.001). CONCLUSION In our analysis, patients who use cannabis have, on average, lower QOL scores signaling that sicker patients resort to cannabis to improve their symptoms and ultimately their quality of life. Patients’ perception is one of improvement in the overall quality of life when using cannabis. Our findings provide background support to perform prospective studies in the impact of cannabis in quality of life of patients with central nervous system tumors.
BACKGROUND Nearly 80,000 new cases of primary brain tumors are expected to be diagnosed this year, 32% of CNS tumors are malignant. Anecdotally, patients who report use of cannabis, frequently describe higher quality of life scores (QOL) in standardized instruments. However, the lack of available tools that allow systematic documentation of cannabis use results in a barrier to accurately assess efficacy, potential benefits and risks. METHODS We conducted a single center, observational study: patients with primary brain tumors answered a previously validated instrument to explore cannabis use. QOL was assessed using the instruments from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer: QLQ-C30 and its complementary module BN-20 as well as the EuroQol instrument EQ-5D-5L. Eligible participants were identified as cannabis users or non-users, completing the instruments in a self-administered fashion. RESULTS To date, 51 patients who signed informed consent were enrolled and answered the questionnaires, mean age was 51 (SD 12.95) years, 34 were male, 30 were considered active cannabis users (66.6% males and 33.3% females). The mean global health score in the QLQ-C30 instrument was 68.4 (SD: 20.7) among cannabis users and 82.2 (SD: 17.5) among non-users. The mean difference in QOL scores between users and non-users was 13.8 (95%CI: 2.8, 24.8; p=0.01). In contrast the difference between cannabis users and non-users in QOL index in the EQ-5D-5L instrument was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.2; p=0.001). Among cannabis users, patients perceive their symptoms as moderate before using cannabis and mild after using cannabis (p >0.001) CONCLUSIONS In our analysis, patients who use cannabis reported, on average, lower QOL scores. Potentially, sicker patients resort to cannabis to improve their symptoms and ultimately quality of life. The perception of patients is that cannabis usage improves overall quality of life. Findings provide support to perform prospective studies.
Functional activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is seen in ~50% of low-grade gliomas and correlates with worse survival. Everolimus is a selective inhibitor of mTOR that targets mTOR-raptor signaling, halting proliferation and indirectly inhibiting angiogenesis. This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy of everolimus in untreated grade II diffuse glioma. Patients were stratified by 1p19q status and PI3K pathway activation (via phosphorylation of PRAS-40) into three arms: 1) 1p19q intact, PRAS-40 phosphorylated received everolimus monotherapy; 2) 1p19q intact, PRAS-40 not phosphorylated received everolimus with temozolomide; and 3) 1p19q co-deleted received everolimus monotherapy. Primary outcome was landmark PFS-33 months for Arms 1 and 2; and PFS-38 months for Arm 3 (null hypothesis 50% for all arms individually). Key eligibility criteria included central pathology confirmation, no prior treatment, and initiation of everolimus within 120 days of most recent tissue sampling. From 05/2014 to 07/2018, 27 patients were enrolled – 16 into Arm 1; 2 into Arm 2; and 9 into Arm 3. Median age at enrollment was 38 years (range 21 – 65); median KPS 90 (range 70 – 100) and a majority were male (74%). Although follow-up is not complete, as of 05/2019 11 of 16 patients had progressed prior to 33 months in Arm 1, and 5 of 9 patients had progressed prior to 38 months in Arm 3. Toxicity was as expected with frequent grade 1/2 AEs of diarrhea, rash, and mucositis. Headache was the most common grade 3 AE and was seen in three cases. The study was closed prematurely secondary to slow accrual and loss of drug support. Updated survival data as well as results of secondary and exploratory analyses will be reported. In summary, everolimus was well tolerated in previously untreated low-grade gliomas. However, it failed to meet primary outcome of extending PFS in this population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.